Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series



Message

alphali -> Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 2:07:33 PM)

Regarding the Tomahawk launch at the Syrian airfield, i read in 'The aviationist' that the destroyers were Alreigh Burke-class destroyers USS Porter (DDG-78) and USS Ross (DDG-71). But i had no luck finding them in the database. So I was wondering if they are under a different name or if there is a reason they are not in the database.

Regards



mikmykWS -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 2:39:41 PM)

Hi Alpha

We don't have every hull of a class in the db as a discrete unit but try and divide by subclass and year. To find what you're looking for just look for a similar Hull number. DDG 75 etc. and then rename to USS ROSS etc. (select unit, press r).

Thanks

Mike



alphali -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 2:47:46 PM)

Noted, thanks for the reply



Raptorx7_slith -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 2:50:31 PM)

Yeah I simulated this in command by doing exactly what Mike said, the Hull numbers are included so you can find the ships.

Just a heads up though, apparently the latest model of Tomahawk was used and they are not carrying them by default iirc.



Gunner98 -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 3:52:00 PM)

As a general rule of thumb when dealing with USN ships in the post -90's era (DDG-51 & most CG-47 class), you should task tailor the VLS loadout. It is a major flexibility facto that the USN employs.

This is just one of the threads devoted to the topic and there are some good resources linked.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4177070&mpage=1&key=USN%2Cloadout�


B



Filitch -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/8/2017 8:57:44 PM)

I will add mikmyk words. You would look for the nearest smaller number of the hull. This way you find the ship of the same modification.



ExNusquam -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/9/2017 2:32:58 PM)

The subclass modeling is consistent across pretty much all platforms, for example you won't find Buyan-M Class Corvette 603 Serpukhov in the database either, but you will find the class in the database.

The only class that seems to have every hull modeled is the FFG-1052 class. I think every hull had a different equipment fit, and command seems to have modeled all of them (I'm only being slightly sarcastic here...).



mikmykWS -> RE: Tomahawk attack on Syria-Destroyers not in database ? (4/9/2017 9:45:43 PM)

Yeah we make different versions of there is change not one is painted pink and the other light red[:)]

Mike



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.65625