RE: Command v1.13 Update

RE: Command v1.13 Update (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series

Message

Filitch -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/10/2017 7:18:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mikmyk Just to be fair I just took a quick and look and no less than 8 or 10 requests that contained Filitch's username have been completed over the past year. Rag just completed a couple more I see. Thanks Mike This is not truth. Fulfilling the request of Dimitris, I postpone our discussion in http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4357915&mpage=1&key=� I really looking forward to the answer mikmyk

Grazyn -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/10/2017 8:24:57 AM)
The updated version of Pole Position still fails to trigger the "scenario start" event. To reproduce, start the scenario, let a few seconds pass, save it, reload in the editor and switch sides. You'll notice that units on the other side didn't get assigned to their missions.

lowchi -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/10/2017 9:03:17 AM)
Looks awesome! Thanks guys!

Drivingguy -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/10/2017 1:58:12 PM)
Great work, can't wait for Shifting Sands.

mikkey -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/10/2017 6:59:47 PM)
Amazing work, thanks!

Primarchx -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/11/2017 9:40:33 PM)
This is so cool! This is a quote from an earlier post I made about doing old Middle East and Vietnam scenarios... quote: I've been slowly gathering OOB info on 1973 October War for a while. The problem I see with doing Linebacker is replicating the high altitude chaff deployments in a meaningful way in Command. And now it works. Wow...!

Splinter00S -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/12/2017 2:03:56 PM)
Update looks great! I couldn't help but notice though that there were no entries for the Advanced Super Hornet being added, and as far as I know it's not in the database already. Are entries for that in the works, or should I head on over to the DB3000 request thread and add a request for that?

DWReese -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/12/2017 6:02:05 PM)
2/22/2014 3:59:13 AM: Weapon: AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3 #120 is attacking MiG-29 Fulcrum A with a base PH of 95%. PH adjusted for actual target speed (740 kts): 100%. MiG-29 Fulcrum A has nominal agility: 4.5, adjusted for altitude: 3.7. Agility adjusted for proficiency (Regular): 2.96. Aircraft has a weight fraction of 0.28 - Agility adjusted to 2.46. High-deflection impact (no effect on agility). Final agility modifier: -25%. Final PH: 75%. Result: 36 - HIT I have a question about the A2A engagements. Listed above is a typical engagement that I have seen. Notice the original PH is 95%. The target is traveling pretty fast, at 740 kts, yet the NEW PH % is now 100%. It went up, despite going faster. In all previous versions of this game, traveling at higher than normal cruise speeds usually lowered the PH%, not raised it. Is this an intentional revision to account for some new formula, or is this an oversight?

RoryAndersonCDT -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/12/2017 6:07:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DWReese 2/22/2014 3:59:13 AM: Weapon: AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3 #120 is attacking MiG-29 Fulcrum A with a base PH of 95%. PH adjusted for actual target speed (740 kts): 100%. MiG-29 Fulcrum A has nominal agility: 4.5, adjusted for altitude: 3.7. Agility adjusted for proficiency (Regular): 2.96. Aircraft has a weight fraction of 0.28 - Agility adjusted to 2.46. High-deflection impact (no effect on agility). Final agility modifier: -25%. Final PH: 75%. Result: 36 - HIT I have a question about the A2A engagements. Listed above is a typical engagement that I have seen. Notice the original PH is 95%. The target is traveling pretty fast, at 740 kts, yet the NEW PH % is now 100%. It went up, despite going faster. In all previous versions of this game, traveling at higher than normal cruise speeds usually lowered the PH%, not raised it. Is this an intentional revision to account for some new formula, or is this an oversight? Thanks, logged.

schweggy -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/12/2017 9:36:15 PM)
As usual, awesome work guys.

AceOfSpadeszzzzzz -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/13/2017 1:39:18 PM)
I have noticed that in v1.13 missiles like AMRAAMs are much more likely to overshoot its target, is it intended to be so?

Dimitris -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/13/2017 1:42:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AceOfSpadeszzzzzz I have noticed that in v1.13 missiles like AMRAAMs are much more likely to overshoot its target, is it intended to be so? Please, 1. New thread in Tech Support forum. 2. Save file. Thanks!

AceOfSpadeszzzzzz -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/13/2017 2:24:09 PM)
OK, thx!

Primarchx -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/16/2017 10:41:00 PM)
I'm not seeing the R 01 Queen Elizabeth and Predator-C from DB 469.

mikmykWS -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/16/2017 10:48:00 PM)
Seeing Queen E here. Pretty sure we didn't add Predator C because the program was squashed. Mike

Primarchx -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/16/2017 11:04:38 PM)
Maybe I'm misreading the notice? quote: .... #2619 - DB3000: Avenger (Predator-C) UCAV ... * Includes the v469 versions of the DB3000 & CWDB databases. DB3000 additions: ... R 01 Queen Elizabeth -- United Kingdom (Royal Navy), 1979, CVA-01, Cancelled ...

mikmykWS -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/17/2017 1:31:06 AM)
Just looked I didn't see the Predator C. Maybe the ticket was closed and captured in the change log? Anyways to recap. For some reason the USAF hated and cancelled the Avenger C. Details here: https://medium.com/war-is-boring/the-u-s-air-force-was-not-fond-of-the-next-gen-predator-drone-77cb9a3d10b8 Perhaps you can convince Rag to add it as a hypothetical unit. Mike

ColonelMolerat -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/19/2017 6:16:49 PM)
Are all of the new features (besides scenarios!) added to CMANO without Shifting Sands? I'm going to get it eventually (I'm currently battling through CoW), but was wondering if I'd be missing anything in the meantime.

HalfLifeExpert -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/19/2017 6:29:16 PM)
Yes, other than the Shifting Sands Scenarios/Campaign, everything in the update is free for all users.

HellcatOne -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/19/2017 7:57:52 PM)
Steam download a little patch ( above 50mb) is the v1.13? ( sorry for stupid question)

ZoroastroBR -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/19/2017 8:19:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HellcatOne Steam download a little patch ( above 50mb) is the v1.13? ( sorry for stupid question) Yes! However, the DLC has been delayed a little while.

Eggstor -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/20/2017 2:54:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ZoroastroBR quote: ORIGINAL: HellcatOne Steam download a little patch ( above 50mb) is the v1.13? ( sorry for stupid question) Yes! However, the DLC has been delayed a little while. Specifically build 972.4 (or at least it was this morning). There is a 972.5 hotfix on the forum.

ColonelMolerat -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (10/20/2017 7:19:15 PM)
quote: Yes, other than the Shifting Sands Scenarios/Campaign, everything in the update is free for all users. Cool. I might wait until I finish the scenarios I'm on then. Or not, depending on how I feel! Deffo going to get it at some point though.

Strike Eagle -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (12/7/2017 1:37:21 PM)
I tried to download the update, but everytime I click on the link it says the file doesn't exist, I'm not sure what the issue is.

Randomizer -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (12/7/2017 2:10:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Strike Eagle I tried to download the update, but everytime I click on the link it says the file doesn't exist, I'm not sure what the issue is. You can get the v13 update from the Member's Area for your registered games. -C

Strike Eagle -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (12/7/2017 2:46:29 PM)
I got the update downloaded now, thank you for the heads up.

themeiza88cm -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (7/14/2018 9:53:50 PM)
I had a question This update supposedly brought the below ship to DB:3000 R 01 Queen Elizabeth -- United Kingdom (Royal Navy), 1979, CVA-01, Cancelled However, I do not see it in the Database viewer. Also are the Royal Navy Phantoms as well as Buccaneers being added as well? V/R J

rmunie0613 -> RE: Command v1.13 Update (7/14/2018 11:47:23 PM)
The R01 is part of the CWDB...probably was a typo... for the record, anything ou of the 1970s is CWDB rather than DB3000. I **Think there are RN Phantoms in there also, but at office so cannot check, but I know for certain the carrier is there.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.8125