Raskolnikov -> Fight fire with (more) fire. (5/21/2003 7:55:11 AM)
|
M46 vs Centurion Mk III: Comparison Survive: 6-6= 0 RoF: 6 - 5 = + 1 FC: 9 - 12 = -3 RF: 7 - 9 = -2 Hull: 107/73/72 - 128/68/52 = -19/+5/+20 Turret: 128/73/51 - 167/114/84 = -39/-41/-33 Other: 12/70 - 25/51 = -13/+19 90mm L53 M3 vs 20lb OQF: Comparison Range: 208(200) - 213(200) = -5(0) Acc: 96 - 140 = -46 WH: 5 - 5 = 0 Kill: 7 - 7 = 0 AP: 185(252) - 251(255) = -66(-3) Cost: 225 - 255 = -30 (All H2H) Not sure how readable all that is :o , but the moral appears to be: [I]Fight him at range with a better gun, better targeting and [B]much, much better turret armour[/B].[/I] Also, not unrealistic to take US Units in UK Army to fill the gaps in the OoB; but it would be unrealistic to take UK Units in US Army. As no US-SO war was fought 1946-9, a UK-US war is, in some ways, no less realistic. [I]E.g.: Newly elected Labour party decide to drop transatlantic alliance, becoming 'Armed Neutrals' in US-SO Cold War. Pressure on US to withdraw from European continent; tensions rise between UK-US gvts and also troops on the ground... [B]conflict.[/B][/I] Not likely, but a good enough storyline to legitimise the breaking of M46s with those 20lbers. Also... M46 has unusually weak top armour: extra vulnerable to air attack.;) Rask. Remember: an [U]M4[/U]6 is still an [U]M4[/U], and they are made for burning.:D
|
|
|
|