Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> The War Room



Message


josant -> Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (1/11/2018 2:55:39 PM)

The vehicles of the database have marked poor geometry or fair geometry or none boxes, What is better, mark the fair geometry box or not to mark?, For example Panther with fair geometry is better than a Panther without this marked. I noted that modern equipment (equipment that is very sloped) dont have this boxes marked.



[image]local://upfiles/24398/AEA68D1A118640198B0E0D7089416D8C.jpg[/image]




Oberst_Klink -> RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (1/11/2018 2:59:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: josant

The vehicles of the database have marked poor geometry or fair geometry or none boxes, What is better, mark the fair geometry box or not to mark?, For example Panther with fair geometry is better than a Panther without this marked. I noted that modern equipment (equipment that is very sloped) dont have this boxes marked.


Companiero Jose!

Modern armour is reactive (in most cases) and not sloped (impossible yet to bent the ceramic/armour/laminate yet); that's reflected in one of the other settings.

See: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindaje_Chobham

Klink, Oberst




Zorch -> RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (1/11/2018 8:13:53 PM)

Is this Euclidean or Non-Euclidean?

[image]local://upfiles/34241/1590F28DF415428D830D17B994539730.gif[/image]




josant -> RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (1/12/2018 12:17:34 PM)

Yes I know this, but in game terms, what is better; mark the Fair Geometry box, or, not to mark?




Oberst_Klink -> RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry (1/12/2018 1:07:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: josant

Yes I know this, but in game terms, what is better; mark the Fair Geometry box, or, not to mark?


Have to do some research, but AFAIR, Bob did some documents for the back then called BioEd equipment editor.

Klink, Oberst




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.75