TPOO -> RE: Adventures in Russia (3/29/2018 3:25:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson quote:
ORIGINAL: 700851McCall I used mostly German divisions to do the heavy clearance work and all available artillery assets. I accompanied the bombardments with limited attacks on minimise losses. It was not too bad and I was able to get the troops involved rested and into the Crimea by October. Really? That sounds good. I was thinking of using the 11th Army formations for Sevastopol and the Rumanians for Z-town and east of there. Kharkov maybe. I don't like the Rumanians as they have funny stacking rules and they almost can't defend themselves in a toe-to-toe with the Soviets so I have to back up their frontage with some German units for insurance. I can use 'em for recon, to convert hexes, for garrison duties in important cities, maybe park them at the airfields for the AA services they might be able to provide. Something like that. The Slovaks and Hungarians and Italians may as well be disbanded for all the good they do. I'll keep 'em around just for their recon value. EDIT: Also, I thought there was a house rule that the Odessa project had to be a pure Rumanian operation. I could be wrong. There is no house rule to only use the Rumanians to attack Odessa, just that was what happened historically if one wanted to follow the historical reenactment. It is also a good way to increase the Rumanian proficiency and save some valuable German heavy rifle squads. It is not as easy to take The Crimea as in the earlier versions so not sending the 11th Army there as soon as possible might make it very hard to capture it before the end of 1941. Use the Hungarians, Italians and Slovaks on a lot of mop up duties to increase their proficiency as well. They will have to hold some part of the line somewhere sometime.
|
|
|
|