Eggstor -> RE: Do attacks from multiple directions make it harder on modern SAMs? (4/12/2018 10:37:56 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2 Both THAAD, Patriot and S400 use phased array track and illumination radars that can illuminate dozens of targets at the same time, so I doubt that using multiple attack vectors will help much. But the radars that are used by these systems do not rotate and can only scan an area up to an certain angle to the radar arrays orientation, so you can actually outflank these systems to the point that they can’t engage you anymore. These systems are different from older systems which use mechanically controlled target illumination radars which can be overwhelmed more easily by a multi vector attack as these systems are limited in their engagement capacity by the number of available illumination radars and the speed by which these radars can mechanically rotate and tilt in order to track and engage a target on a different vector. W. The orientation issue only affects the Patriot (and the THAAD, though that is strictly an anti-ballistic missile weapon). The S-300/S-400 systems use radars that are capable of 360-degree rotation/detection. As Dimitris pointed out, a multi-axis attack is still useful against the S-300/S-400 (or at least the versions of the S-400 with the 48N6/Growler A), primarily for the second reason. Those missiles still require illumination at launch and don't have unlimited datalink channels. Lots of luck getting to a S-400 (or S-350) batallion with active radar missiles on the rails because they don't require illumination at launch.
|
|
|
|