IJN CV airwings "re-shaping"

IJN CV airwings "re-shaping" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific

Message

Oleg Mastruko -> IJN CV airwings "re-shaping" (6/16/2003 10:28:11 PM)
In UV, IJN CVs change the configuration of their airwings sometime around 1st July 42, so that the number of Zeros and Vals is higher, and number of Kates is lower than before. AFAIK, it is done on all carriers, even on the ones that were sunk in Midway battle, and for which there is no historical information re July-42 composition of airwings, simply because they were sunk by that time. Why is it so? I assume that historically only the Shokaku and Zuikaku airwings changed their composition, because those carriers were the only surviving CVs in IJN. But why? Aren't Kates better ship killers than Vals? Looking in my reference materials I have found that as "another lesson from the battle of Midway the number of both fighters and dive bombers (on Shokaku) was increased to 27 operational and 5 reserve planes. To compensate for this the number of torpedo bombers was reduced to 18 operational and 2 reserve etc." This is written by Japanese author, but he does not say what exactly were those "lessons from Midway"? I can see the need for more Zeros after Midway, but why more Vals, and why lessen the number of Kates?? Weren't the Kates best ship killers, that, after all, did most damage to Yorktown at Midway? There is another semi-philosophical issue here. Since UV "avoids" Midway in most scenarios, then perhaps there should be no change to IJN CV airwings, that were the direct result of Midway (and are applied even to the CVs historically sunk at Midway). Comments? Personally, I'd rather have more Kates than Vals, although I think 50-50% is the best solution. O.

Apollo11 -> Re: IJN CV airwings "re-shaping" (6/16/2003 10:40:41 PM)
Hi all, [QUOTE]Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko [B]In UV, IJN CVs change the configuration of their airwings sometime around 1st July 42, so that the number of Zeros and Vals is higher, and number of Kates is lower than before. AFAIK, it is done on all carriers, even on the ones that were sunk in Midway battle, and for which there is no historical information re July-42 composition of airwings, simply because they were sunk by that time. Why is it so? I assume that historically only the Shokaku and Zuikaku airwings changed their composition, because those carriers were the only surviving CVs in IJN. But why? Aren't Kates better ship killers than Vals? Looking in my reference materials I have found that as "another lesson from the battle of Midway the number of both fighters and dive bombers (on Shokaku) was increased to 27 operational and 5 reserve planes. To compensate for this the number of torpedo bombers was reduced to 18 operational and 2 reserve etc." This is written by Japanese author, but he does not say what exactly were those "lessons from Midway"? I can see the need for more Zeros after Midway, but why more Vals, and why lessen the number of Kates?? Weren't the Kates best ship killers, that, after all, did most damage to Yorktown at Midway? There is another semi-philosophical issue here. Since UV "avoids" Midway in most scenarios, then perhaps there should be no change to IJN CV airwings, that were the direct result of Midway (and are applied even to the CVs historically sunk at Midway). Comments? Personally, I'd rather have more Kates than Vals, although I think 50-50% is the best solution. O. [/B][/QUOTE] As far as I know both sides considered dive bombers bigger threat than torpedo bombers. This is due to relatively very high precision possible with good dive bombing crews (and fact that at Midway the dive bombers sealed the fate of Japanese CVs)... Leo "Apollo11" P.S. US carriers had 2 wings of dive bombers and 1 of torpedo bombers so perhaps, japanese were "mimicking" that fact (lesson from Midway?)...

Admiral DadMan -> (6/16/2003 10:47:48 PM)
IIRC, it had more to do with the high attrition rate for Kate drivers, hence fewer were available to even get the darn thing off the deck without fouling.

Oleg Mastruko -> Re: Re: IJN CV airwings "re-shaping" (6/16/2003 10:51:14 PM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Apollo11 [B]Hi all, As far as I know both sides considered dive bombers bigger threat than torpedo bombers. P.S. US carriers had 2 wings of dive bombers and 1 of torpedo bombers so perhaps, japanese were "mimicking" that fact (lesson from Midway?)... [/B][/QUOTE] If that's the lesson learned from Midway I think it is the wrong lesson :) US pioneered dive bombing techniques (even the Germans learned from them) and had ****ty torpedo bomber to begin the war with (and unreliable torpedos too) so USN reliance on SBD is understandable. But on the IJN side Kates were much better in antiship role than Vals (or at least I see it that way), and it's easier to make a torpedo run than dive bombing attack (important if you lost your best pilots and have lots of green crews). O.

Admiral DadMan -> Re: Re: Re: IJN CV airwings "re-shaping" (6/16/2003 10:58:30 PM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko [B]If that's the lesson learned from Midway I think it is the wrong lesson :) US pioneered dive bombing techniques (even the Germans learned from them) and had ****ty torpedo bomber to begin the war with (and unreliable torpedos too) so USN reliance on SBD is understandable. But on the IJN side Kates were much better in antiship role than Vals (or at least I see it that way), and it's easier to make a torpedo run than dive bombing attack (important if you lost your best pilots and have lots of green crews). O. [/B][/QUOTE]Yes, it's much easier to repair holes in the deck than holes in the hull :D. I love my Kate drivers.

kentaggie -> (6/16/2003 11:07:17 PM)
While the Kates are better ship killers in UV, that is only true until they get in a big furball. They are deadly for the first CV battle, but flak and fighters will take a huge chunk out of them to where their experience levels for whole squadrons drop 20% when they get replacements. Joe Louis with a glass jaw. Little known fact I have read in 2 different books - Vals sank more allied ships than any other Japanese aircraft.

mogami -> Data Base (6/16/2003 11:15:59 PM)
Hi, You would need a database for each scenario with group changes and ship upgrades. I think UV only uses one main data base. In WITP you will be able to modify the database much more then in UV. (The IJN begins with 1/3 1/3 1/3 fighters dive-bombers torpedo planes and changes to 2/5 2/5 1/5) This change also allowed more ordnance to be carried on board the CV (fewer torpedoes meant more bombs) The Japanese intended on using larger bombs in future battles. What we really need is adding the Japanese 800kg bomb. (The Judy divebomber could carry one) It was the USN 1k and 2k bombs that made the Japanese prefer dive-bombers.

CapAndGown -> (6/17/2003 1:52:19 AM)
Just to repeat what Dadman stated, IIRC, it was in "Combined Fleet Decoded" that I read that the change over was due the the high attrition rate for torpedo bombers. Too many Kate pilots were lost for the training system to keep up.

Oleg Mastruko -> (6/17/2003 2:40:01 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by kentaggie [B]Little known fact I have read in 2 different books - Vals sank more allied ships than any other Japanese aircraft. [/B][/QUOTE] Yes I've read it too, the exact phrasing was that the Val is the most successful Axis anti-ship aircraft, overall (!!!). That means more shipping tonnage was sunk by Vals, than, say, by Condors or Stukas or Ju 88 or He111 or Kates or ... I find this very very hard to believe without being presented with hard facts, what do the others think? O.

Nikademus -> (6/17/2003 2:41:25 AM)
This is correct. It was actually Coral Sea, more than Midway that made the Japanese skittish with their torp bombers due to heavy losses. Midway added to the fear. Such was the extent of this skitishness that Nagumo held back all his torp bombers from his 1st wave strikes at Eastern Solomons so that they could be lauched in a 2nd wave after the enemy defenses had been softened up This was grave error of course and cost the Japanese the chance to score better than they did

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.609375