|
ITAKLinus -> RE: ooking for an IJ opponent, scenario 001 (11/29/2019 2:48:45 PM)
|
Of course, Alfred.
Here is the general AAR link: http://www.netwargamingitalia.net/forum/threads/aar-tutti-i-vivi-allassalto-linus-j-vs-longstreet-a.30646/
This is his AAR: http://www.netwargamingitalia.net/forum/threads/dear-prudence-ii-linus-j-vs-long-a.30650/
In post #49 he even admits, minimising, that he has brought Chinese in Burma witout paying PPs.
I guess you do not know italian (google translate makes miracles though [:D][:D])
Just for the sake of clarification, here few things which happened:
- No HRs wanted over night bombing "because I've never done it and I don't do it". Every single night B17 even at 0% moonlight at 7k ft bombing my harbors.
- Chinese brought to Burma without paying PPs. When I realise that, I unilaterally say that then also Kwantung Army can move to China without paying PPs. I move 2k AV into China from Kwantung. We then agree not to use the units there without paying PPs. I start paying for my guys from Kwantung when I do realise that his Chinese were with "grey" HQ and he lied about being in the process of regularising their HQs (since it's impossible).
- He protested and wanted re-dos for things I discovered after weren't "bug" but his incompetency. For example, the whole mechanic of encircling land units wasn't clear 100% to me and I trusted him when he said he was victim of a bug and made his 90k chinese I para-encircled free. Same goes with air units in "ground attack" in hexes where there are no units and being readdressed against hexes where there are units. It's a game mechanic, not a bug.
I simply asked on the forum after a while and realised that there were no bugs at all in the situations above, just the willingness of the adversary to misinterpret the manual and exploit the fact I was at my first game.
- Continuous accusations of not paying PPs for units in China willing to share screens continuosly. For free intelligence I realised soon.
And I can continue for long.
Against me it can be said that it was at my first game in WITPAE (not even a scenario vs AI) and my first game in absolute in a wargame (if you do not consider Risiko a wargame... [:D] ) so I have been quite naive in giving trust to the adversary over several stuff since my first committment was to a pleasant and interesting experience. I should have taken for granted the fact that people are willing to lie and do whatever trick. Personally, I find this approach counterproductive and, honestly, it hurts a lot a community which is already quite small. Thanks god not every person I met in witpae matches corresponds to this description or I would have left long time ago.
Also played a game as Allied against a player called Pickett, who, in theory, should be his son. I personally think they're the same person.
Here the AAR of that (ended after 2 weeks becase "Dutch bombers on oilfields are gamey" and stuff like that): http://www.netwargamingitalia.net/forum/threads/aar-pacific-bunga-bunga.30917/
Please note that this second AAR contains several games merged together in a single AAR. The first part is the one I am talking about.
From Page #17 onwards, for example, it is about my current PBEM as Jap.
I know it's messy to put several AARs in the same thread but I thought at it as, in line of principle, my "secondary AAR" with whatver second match I am doing.
Then there is my "primary" AAR of the long-term game I am doing (currntly paused for personal reasons) in which it is clear, such as in the others, that I do no violate HRs and things like that: http://www.netwargamingitalia.net/forum/threads/aar-%C3%80-la-guerre-comme-%C3%A0-la-guerre-linus-j-vs-ste_peterpan-a.30732/
These 2 AARs are day-to-day. The first one against Longstrett hasn't been because, simply, it was my first AAR. I have been wrong in stating it was day-by-day: there are few days missing and, especially, the formatting is not like the others which are much easier to track. Still, it's almost day-by-day.
As mentioned in my last post, I can also provide references confirming and subscribing my statements.
EDIT: I forgot to mention the fact that, as evident above, I have kept playing with the community's members. He deleted his account one week after he surrendered. Here the link to that (see post #104): http://www.netwargamingitalia.net/forum/threads/richiesta-cancellazione-proprio-account.6981/page-6#post-471939
|
|
|
|
