Essro -> RE: Strategic Command WIE vs warplan (11/27/2019 6:31:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zovs You can't compare the two, they both serve completely different ideas and concepts. If you come from a board war game back (from the 60's, 70's and 80's) then you'll love WP. If you liked such board games as Avalon Hill's The Rise and Decline of the Third Reich (aka Third Reich) then you'll love WP. If you liked SPI's ETO Theater of Operations you'll love WP. I have several SC3 games and they are fine but I prefer WP due to my background in board war games from the 60's through the 90s. Agreed. I have played both. I prefer Warplan. As I see it, Warplan is more of a wargame whereas SC is more of a video game. SC is full of gimmicks and somewhat gamey to me. At present I would admit SC is more polished but the Warplan designer is very active in addressing questions and concerns. My tabletop wargaming background is roughly 35 years. I have an obsession with grand strategic WW2 games and have played most--with my favs being AWAW, WiF, and AETO/APTO (and I also like the quirky outcomes of Totaler Krieg). AWAW is probably the leader of the pack but I like aspects of each. For video games, I have nothing but dislike for most of the attempts to create a computer version of a decent version of what I'm interested in. Warplan is quickly showing itself to be a solid effort. MWiF was a valiant attempt...but the outcome was disappointing (to me anyway). I am still bitter about how much I spent on what I consider to still be an incomplete game. No fault to the designer and his incredible army of folks who have helped. It has been a considerable community effort at the very least. Others will--and should--disagree with me since it comes down to personal preference. I'm simply not a big fan of SC but I absolutely see why people like it. Anyhow, that's my two cents.
|
|
|
|