- (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message


castor troy -> - (8/15/2020 9:05:42 AM)

disregard pls




KenchiSulla -> RE: - (8/15/2020 9:56:32 AM)

Never




btd64 -> RE: - (8/15/2020 11:56:10 AM)

Oh no. Not another "DISREGARD" again....GP




geofflambert -> RE: - (8/15/2020 12:05:26 PM)

- I say. -!




Zorch -> RE: - (8/15/2020 12:36:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

- I say. -!

"-" is the secret code for Release the Kracken!
Either that or a leftover Morse code symbol.




geofflambert -> RE: - (8/15/2020 3:46:07 PM)

.

[image]local://upfiles/37002/0F2201BAC17C48CD973A923C0C2451C4.jpg[/image]




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/15/2020 3:46:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

disregard pls


Why? Oder, Warum?




Zorch -> RE: - (8/15/2020 4:15:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

.

[image]local://upfiles/37002/0F2201BAC17C48CD973A923C0C2451C4.jpg[/image]

Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/15/2020 4:28:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

.

[image]local://upfiles/37002/0F2201BAC17C48CD973A923C0C2451C4.jpg[/image]

Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]


I have been to London Bridge! [:D]




Orm -> RE: - (8/15/2020 4:38:22 PM)

Disregard what? I do not see anything to disregard. [&:]




durnedwolf -> RE: - (8/15/2020 5:16:42 PM)

Copy - will do.




Zorch -> RE: - (8/15/2020 6:55:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Disregard what? I do not see anything to disregard. [&:]

It's an implied disregard, like a rhetorical question.




Nomad -> RE: - (8/15/2020 7:11:02 PM)

we are disregarding again.




rustysi -> RE: - (8/15/2020 8:52:33 PM)

OK, disregarding.[:D]




Zorch -> RE: - (8/15/2020 9:23:31 PM)

You do not have to reply to <d-word> this thread. It is implicit by not replying.




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/15/2020 10:10:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

You do not have to reply to <d-word> this thread. It is implicit by not replying.


Okay, I will disregard this then.




stuman -> RE: - (8/16/2020 1:26:24 AM)

But why ?




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/16/2020 4:09:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

But why ?


Why not?




Ian R -> RE: - (8/16/2020 12:40:46 PM)

Veni, vidi illas vilipendi.




GetAssista -> RE: - (8/16/2020 3:42:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch
Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]

This is an ex-parrot (c)




Zorch -> RE: - (8/16/2020 4:10:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch
Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]

This is an ex-parrot (c)



[image]local://upfiles/34241/4E25BC9D58A44CB282AC9A185C73057C.gif[/image]




geofflambert -> RE: - (8/16/2020 5:57:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch




[image]local://upfiles/34241/4E25BC9D58A44CB282AC9A185C73057C.gif[/image]


Binzo Boni Björni




fcooke -> RE: - (8/17/2020 12:18:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

.

[image]local://upfiles/37002/0F2201BAC17C48CD973A923C0C2451C4.jpg[/image]

Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]


I have been to London Bridge! [:D]

Maybe you have....but that is Tower bridge [:D]





RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/17/2020 12:40:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fcooke


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

.

[image]local://upfiles/37002/0F2201BAC17C48CD973A923C0C2451C4.jpg[/image]

Parrot > Duck

[image]local://upfiles/34241/751E08ADBF3843ACB85F4FB4B528B51D.jpg[/image]


I have been to London Bridge! [:D]

Maybe you have....but that is Tower bridge [:D]




I did not state what bridge it was! I just stated that I have been to London Bridge!




fcooke -> RE: - (8/17/2020 1:21:12 AM)

I guess I took the comment out of context.....[8|]




fcooke -> RE: - (8/17/2020 1:22:19 AM)

And which London bridge? The existing or the original? [&:]




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/17/2020 3:43:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fcooke

I guess I took the comment out of context.....[8|]


It is fun to take things out of context! [sm=00000622.gif]




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/17/2020 3:44:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fcooke

And which London bridge? The existing or the original? [&:]


The London bridge! [;)] The original one burned down, as in "London bridge is falling down . . . "




fcooke -> RE: - (8/17/2020 1:12:11 PM)

The original one (if you don't take into account the various Roman ones), had many fires among all the houses and shops that had been built on it, but I don't think the bridge itself ever fell down. The one that replaced sort of fell down as it was slowly sinking into the Thames and was dismantled, and bought by an American, who shipped it to I think Arizona and then put it back together (talk about an ego project). And now we have the current one, which pretty much lacks any character at all.

So....I am guessing you are not so old to have viewed the ones that had the fires [8D] But is it the one in Arizona that you have seen or the current one in London? [:D]




RangerJoe -> RE: - (8/17/2020 1:46:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fcooke

The original one (if you don't take into account the various Roman ones), had many fires among all the houses and shops that had been built on it, but I don't think the bridge itself ever fell down. The one that replaced sort of fell down as it was slowly sinking into the Thames and was dismantled, and bought by an American, who shipped it to I think Arizona and then put it back together (talk about an ego project). And now we have the current one, which pretty much lacks any character at all.

So....I am guessing you are not so old to have viewed the ones that had the fires [8D] But is it the one in Arizona that you have seen or the current one in London? [:D]


It was not an ego project, it was a tourist project. Yes, I have been to Arionza.

I repeat, I have been to London bridge. [:D]

Unfortunately, I have also been to Chicago. [:(]




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.984375