Philo32b -> RE: Upgraded units requiring additional same material (8/23/2020 9:42:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Clux If I'm not mistaken, thats done on purpose, as it says on the manual than its more expensive in the long term to "upgrade" units instead of "replacing" them. Thank you for reminding me I should have gone to the manual--I should have done that first. But reviewing the manual raises a problem. The manual says that the cost of the upgrade should be the cost difference between the two model versions, plus 33%. The example given in the manual gives 10 metal for mk I and 20 metal for mk II. Upgrading a mk I to mk II of this model would be 10 metal plus 3 = 13 metal. But in my case with machine resources the cost difference between mk I (one machine) and mk II (one machine) is zero. (There are some additional costs in metal and IP, of course.) So by the manual, there should be no additional cost in machine resources. Have I missed something here?
|
|
|
|