RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports

Message

mind_messing -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/7/2021 4:41:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe I am officially baffled by the IJN moves...[&:][sm=crazy.gif] Makes two of us. I do take a certain pleasure out of seeing a fairly dispersed IJ campaign get methodically broken down by good Allied play. It's often just a case of Allied players getting rattled by IJ occupations at Colombo, Cooktown and Noumea rather than having a good sense of just how massively exposed the IJ are as a result.

RangerJoe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/7/2021 5:44:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mind_messing quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe I am officially baffled by the IJN moves...[&:][sm=crazy.gif] Makes two of us. I do take a certain pleasure out of seeing a fairly dispersed IJ campaign get methodically broken down by good Allied play. It's often just a case of Allied players getting rattled by IJ occupations at Colombo, Cooktown and Noumea rather than having a good sense of just how massively exposed the IJ are as a result. Not to mention the lack of coordination between the IO and the South Pacific / Coral Sea areas.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 2:43:43 AM)
Turn is away...not doing too much, sub patrols, coordinated air attack from only 2 airbases in India...no attack at Bundaberg, just a bombardment. Trying to hunt down cripples along the Australian coast with subs...willing to take KB air strikes over Marysborough or Brisbane. Hoping our troops get to the Ankang road fight in time...I see IJA troops retreating there, but I am sure it is only a few disrupted tank units. [image]local://upfiles/44178/C1FD1A2EF8DE4B598B9DEBC564236E65.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 11:44:55 AM)
May 7th, 1942 IJN finally bombards...our CD guns do good work...but hits on the R class not good. A little surprised by so many of them, port is size 4. I like what is happening here, as I think I will be able to get many air attacks in and play with how to coordinate the air attacks. Plenty of AA at Cochin to protect from bombers, so our air force will be able to hopefully catch hesitant shore bombardment task forces far from Colombo. If the KB shows up, those 800kg bombs might do some real damage...but the AA is very heavy. Tanjore reached level 8 AF today, Triv is 3, Madurai 2, Madras 6. Worried a bit about Triv being bombarded... Snapper got spotted in Cochin, but the IJN will also have run the guantlet of an increasing submarine presence too. [image]local://upfiles/44178/8B55D3025C134844ABB9DEC5C8A3A81D.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 11:49:52 AM)
Off the Australian coast we spot a big convoy headed to Rockhampton and hit this cruiser, but the torp won't explode. ASW attack near Rockhampton at 96,150 Japanese Ships AMC Kongo Maru AMC Kiyosumi Maru xAP Hakozaki Maru xAK Nichiryo Maru xAK Toyohasi Maru xAK Arabia Maru DD Sanae Allied Ships SS Sealion SS Sealion is sighted by escort [image]local://upfiles/44178/78C41B3D6F8042CA98C0EF1C544C7F6D.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 11:54:09 AM)
One hex from Colombo we get some decent coordinated attacks...and one hit. Morning Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,47 Weather in hex: Heavy cloud Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 4,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 3 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 14 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 6 Allied aircraft Fulmar II x 11 No Japanese losses Allied aircraft losses Fulmar II: 2 destroyed --------------- Morning Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,47 Weather in hex: Heavy cloud Raid spotted at 4 NM, estimated altitude 2,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 2 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 13 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 6 Allied aircraft Albacore I x 13 Hurricane IIa Trop x 10 No Japanese losses Allied aircraft losses Albacore I: 2 destroyed, 6 damaged Japanese Ships BB Haruna CL Kitakami Aircraft Attacking: 9 x Albacore I launching torpedoes at 200 feet Naval Attack: 1 x 18in Mk XII Torpedo ------------ Morning Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,47 Weather in hex: Heavy cloud Raid spotted at 14 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 9 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 12 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 5 Allied aircraft Hurricane I Trop x 10 Hurricane IIa Trop x 11 Vildebeest III x 9 No Japanese losses Allied aircraft losses Vildebeest III: 2 damaged Japanese Ships CA Takao CL Naka CA Chokai, Torpedo hits 1 Aircraft Attacking: 9 x Vildebeest III launching torpedoes at 200 feet Naval Attack: 1 x 18in Mk XII Torpedo ---------- Morning Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,47 Weather in hex: Heavy cloud Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 6 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 3 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 1 Allied aircraft Hurricane I Trop x 14 Hurricane IIb Trop x 7 A-24 Banshee x 9 Japanese aircraft losses Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 1 destroyed Allied aircraft losses A-24 Banshee: 3 damaged Japanese Ships CA Suzuya BB Kongo Aircraft Attacking: 8 x A-24 Banshee releasing from 4000' Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb 1 x A-24 Banshee releasing from 3000' Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb [image]local://upfiles/44178/359475B06910433B9BC657D1F5A0F01B.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 11:55:30 AM)
Our sweep went into Colombo prior to the naval attacks...and got roughly handled thanks. Morning Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48 Weather in hex: Overcast Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 39,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 2 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 29 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 1 Allied aircraft Hurricane IIb Trop x 15 Japanese aircraft losses A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed Allied aircraft losses Hurricane IIb Trop: 4 destroyed CAP engaged: Tainan Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 2 on standby, 0 scrambling) 2 plane(s) intercepting now. 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 10000 Time for all group planes to reach interception is 44 minutes 3rd Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 10 on standby, 0 scrambling) 5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 32000 Time for all group planes to reach interception is 18 minutes Tainan Ku S-1 Det A with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling) 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 21000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 21000. Time for all group planes to reach interception is 33 minutes Zuiho-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling) 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 6 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 21000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 21000. Time for all group planes to reach interception is 1 minutes 10th I.F.Chutai with Ki-43-Ic Oscar (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling) 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 3000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 3000. Time for all group planes to reach interception is 40 minutes 12th Ku S-1 Det A with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling) 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 32000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 32000. Time for all group planes to reach interception is 40 minutes

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 11:56:53 AM)
Japan is just absolutely harsh when it comes to timing attacks...another on the Ankang road![X(] [image]local://upfiles/44178/E21C6F1394B846FEBB31E4131561CE23.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:02:58 PM)
Reported losses: [image]local://upfiles/44178/CD37E5CF25D64224A361B1385E9931D2.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:19:33 PM)
Japan has a dozen fighters and aux now at Bundaberg, flying out troops I guess from the damaged runways. Right now we lack enough destroyer escorts to challenge, plus I don't fancy fighting the IJN heavy cruisers with what I have. Minneapolis and 8 DDs are just off Sydney and heading north...they were spotted by an Iboat...so Japan knows more ships are coming. Bundaberg is patrolled by PT boats, so no fast transport out there and we will have another general attack today. Another batch of CD guns arrived today to add their weight in the assault. Took Winton by paradrop... Ground combat at Bundaberg (96,155) Allied Bombardment attack Attacking force 6958 troops, 211 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 850 Defending force 15817 troops, 173 guns, 37 vehicles, Assault Value = 276 Japanese ground losses: 35 casualties reported Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Allied ground losses: 12 casualties reported Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled Assaulting units: 34th Infantry Regiment 5th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment 5th Australian Division 6th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment 3rd Australian Division 4th Australian/A Division 46th Indian Brigade 2/8th Armoured Regiment 2/4th Armoured Regiment 7th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment 4th Australian/B Division 98th Coast AA Regiment 131st Field Artillery Battalion 148th Field Artillery Battalion 4th RAAF Base Force 147th Field Artillery Battalion 2nd RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment 198th Field Artillery Battalion 2nd Marine Defense Battalion 260th Field Artillery Battalion 223rd Field Artillery Battalion A/B Battery Heavy Coastal Artillery Regiment Defending units: 33rd Division Sasebo 8th SNLF Yokosuka 4th SNLF 1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment 5th Naval Construction Battalion 1st Raiding Rgt /2 4th JAAF AF Bn 21st Infantry Rgt /7 [image]local://upfiles/44178/95C9DADE14AA4FA8892E332BE0A0E032.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:27:16 PM)
I think my best return is to stay in port and inflict as much frictional damage as I can to the IJ...I do have the two British CVs at Mombasa...not sure I want to commit them to save these R classes. We have managed to inflict some decent damage, two cruisers torpedoed, minor damage from the CD guns, a couple of bomb hits, multiple hits on the mini KB...so we shall continue. [image]local://upfiles/44178/7D1F178EBE1C4702ADBF204898D2E7F7.jpg[/image]

BBfanboy -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:28:10 PM)
My understanding of actual CD Guns in the Coastal Artillery regiments is that they only fire on ships because they don't have the traverse to aim at land targets. Can you confirm that the animation shows the Coastal Arty Regiments fire during your land bombardments? Especially the "Heavy Coastal Artillery Regiment" Batteries, which may have a CD gun device rather than a more mobile arty gun.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:31:50 PM)
I am not sure how gung ho Japan is to get the R classes...is an invasion at Cochin possible in 2 months time for example? I think he would probably need the KB to do it, and if you sent the KB he has to be thinking those planes could sink them at less cost? But a major pull back here in eastern India...Japan has yet to take Singers...but my guess is the troops from Luzon will eventually head there...these guys in India are for offensive operations I bet. [image]local://upfiles/44178/3FAEFFCAC3A24A6782A79D76AB7ACF58.jpg[/image]

BBfanboy -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:34:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe I think my best return is to stay in port and inflict as much frictional damage as I can to the IJ...I do have the two British CVs at Mombasa...not sure I want to commit them to save these R classes. We have managed to inflict some decent damage, two cruisers torpedoed, minor damage from the CD guns, a couple of bomb hits, multiple hits on the mini KB...so we shall continue. I think the British carriers he spotted near Diego Garcia might be the reason he brought the mini-KB and muchos heavy ships to the area. I agree with your thinking to hold them in Mombasa for now. He will be thinking they might be up the west coast of India and try to suppress air bases enough to go up there with his bombardment ships. More chances for your torpedo bombers. Not sure when the Aussie Beaufighters with torp ability come. I think it is the Beaufighter VIII.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:39:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BBfanboy My understanding of actual CD Guns in the Coastal Artillery regiments is that they only fire on ships because they don't have the traverse to aim at land targets. Can you confirm that the animation shows the Coastal Arty Regiments fire during your land bombardments? Especially the "Heavy Coastal Artillery Regiment" Batteries, which may have a CD gun device rather than a more mobile arty gun. Will check into it...but NYGiants said a developer of dababes told him to use them in this manner. [;)] [:)]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 12:43:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BBfanboy quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe I think my best return is to stay in port and inflict as much frictional damage as I can to the IJ...I do have the two British CVs at Mombasa...not sure I want to commit them to save these R classes. We have managed to inflict some decent damage, two cruisers torpedoed, minor damage from the CD guns, a couple of bomb hits, multiple hits on the mini KB...so we shall continue. I think the British carriers he spotted near Diego Garcia might be the reason he brought the mini-KB and muchos heavy ships to the area. I agree with your thinking to hold them in Mombasa for now. He will be thinking they might be up the west coast of India and try to suppress air bases enough to go up there with his bombardment ships. More chances for your torpedo bombers. Not sure when the Aussie Beaufighters with torp ability come. I think it is the Beaufighter VIII. I have these guys, but no pool planes...so they will hang out and train. [image]local://upfiles/44178/5B059E7A384E41568640A1543B6147C6.jpg[/image]

RangerJoe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 1:15:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe quote: ORIGINAL: BBfanboy quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe I think my best return is to stay in port and inflict as much frictional damage as I can to the IJ...I do have the two British CVs at Mombasa...not sure I want to commit them to save these R classes. We have managed to inflict some decent damage, two cruisers torpedoed, minor damage from the CD guns, a couple of bomb hits, multiple hits on the mini KB...so we shall continue. I think the British carriers he spotted near Diego Garcia might be the reason he brought the mini-KB and muchos heavy ships to the area. I agree with your thinking to hold them in Mombasa for now. He will be thinking they might be up the west coast of India and try to suppress air bases enough to go up there with his bombardment ships. More chances for your torpedo bombers. Not sure when the Aussie Beaufighters with torp ability come. I think it is the Beaufighter VIII. I have these guys, but no pool planes...so they will hang out and train. [image]local://upfiles/44178/5B059E7A384E41568640A1543B6147C6.jpg[/image] If you train them at 1000 feet, that may improve their defensive skills faster.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 2:03:14 PM)
Having to watch the replay again, I see that we did belt armor penetration, critical damage, damage to engines to the cruiser off Colombo.[:)] Also had very good hits on the IJN on the first bombardment...20cm, 6" belt armor penetration on the CL...we inflicted some very decent damage across the board on all ships hit.[:)]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 2:07:12 PM)
CD artillery bombarding: [image]local://upfiles/44178/D9F3D57E884549B5949498BC9EF9FDCF.jpg[/image]

BBfanboy -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 2:26:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe CD artillery bombarding: [image]local://upfiles/44178/D9F3D57E884549B5949498BC9EF9FDCF.jpg[/image] Great! Thank you for checking that out. I have used Marine Defence Bns for land bombardment because their guns are not designated CD guns, but I always thought the Aussie ones were limited on ground bombardment. Another tool in the chest ...[:)]

JohnDillworth -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/8/2021 9:54:35 PM)
do these BB's have float planes? If so get rid of them. This way you opponent might think an actual sinking is FOW.

Encircled -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 10:41:59 AM)
Good damage on those ships Take it lots of night bombing on Colombo coming up?

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 11:59:03 AM)
May 8th, 1942 Another deliberate attack on the Ankang road... 1-2 odds. Our Stuarts enter into combat, and do horribly again getting disrupted and will retreat back to recover. Ground combat at 83,45 (near Nanyang) Japanese Deliberate attack Attacking force 27482 troops, 281 guns, 527 vehicles, Assault Value = 689 Defending force 36023 troops, 195 guns, 68 vehicles, Assault Value = 786 Japanese adjusted assault: 149 Allied adjusted defense: 361 Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 Combat modifiers Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-) Attacker: Japanese ground losses: 120 casualties reported Squads: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled Vehicles lost 56 (7 destroyed, 49 disabled) Allied ground losses: 359 casualties reported Squads: 5 destroyed, 37 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled Vehicles lost 45 (7 destroyed, 38 disabled) Assaulting units: 10th Tank Regiment 3rd Tank Regiment 15th Division 23rd Tank Regiment 9th Tank Regiment 116th Division 12th Tank Regiment 13th Tank Regiment 11th Tank Regiment 13th Army 51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion 11th Field Artillery Regiment Defending units: 43rd Cavalry Regiment 55th Chinese Corps 41st Chinese Corps 30th Chinese Corps 77th Chinese Corps [image]local://upfiles/44178/418B6D50BBDF409F941A1AF3DDD3A9AD.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 12:00:51 PM)
Another really bad roll on attack...our experience is still 50 or lower basically...so that might be playing a big role. Japan is amphibiously withdrawing troops from Rockhampton... [image]local://upfiles/44178/18E3C9297C2F4318AEE2C89C6065F536.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 12:02:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth do these BB's have float planes? If so get rid of them. This way you opponent might think an actual sinking is FOW. Not sure what you are suggesting. The Floats plane squadrons are off and working. I want Japan to expend effort to try and sink them.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 12:03:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Encircled Good damage on those ships Take it lots of night bombing on Colombo coming up? Nope. Big daytime raid on Colombo. Japan has 100 fighters. We are sweeping with 200+ F and hitting the port with all the B26s and the Shipyard and Industry with the B17s. Fulmars sweeping at 1000. Flying from four airbases....could be a disaster.[:)]

witpqs -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 12:26:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe quote: ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth do these BB's have float planes? If so get rid of them. This way you opponent might think an actual sinking is FOW. Not sure what you are suggesting. The Floats plane squadrons are off and working. I want Japan to expend effort to try and sink them. I think he meant to do what you have already done: get them off. If they remained aboard your opponent could look at ground losses for them to confirm a sinking, whereas with none aboard in the event of a sinking there might remain doubt about whether the sinking was genuine or FOW.

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 1:31:43 PM)
May 9th, 1942 Miss. Although his goal is to fish out downed pilots during the day. [image]local://upfiles/44178/FB2AE67A9EF14BE592FEEDEF59BD60F3.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 1:33:46 PM)
Japan starts off with 90 fighters on daytime CAP, the vast majority of them Zeroes. Sweeps during the morning totally eliminate them, but of course the bombers are going in during the afternoon, and 33 planes meet the first afternoon sweep, then the first coordinated bombing run goes in... Afternoon Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48 Weather in hex: Overcast Raid spotted at 26 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 7 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 27 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 2 Allied aircraft B-17D Fortress x 6 B-26 Marauder x 39 P-39D Airacobra x 24 No Japanese losses Allied aircraft losses B-26 Marauder: 1 damaged P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed Japanese Ships SS I-121, Bomb hits 3, and is sunk SC Ch 5, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage xAK Amagi Maru, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage xAK Hankow Maru, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage Japanese ground losses: 14 casualties reported Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Repair Shipyard hits 2 Port hits 24 Port fuel hits 3 Port supply hits 11 [image]local://upfiles/44178/57697749FCCA40E9897385CF82CC48E5.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) (7/9/2021 1:34:26 PM)
B26s...they are all rested and ready... Afternoon Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48 Weather in hex: Overcast Raid spotted at 34 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 9 minutes Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 26 Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 1 Allied aircraft B-26 Marauder x 12 No Japanese losses Allied aircraft losses B-26 Marauder: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged Japanese Ships xAK Amagi Maru, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage Port hits 3

Page: << < prev 84 85 [86] 87 88 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.7338867