Vathailos -> Vath: 0 Fence Post:0 (8/20/2003 11:09:53 AM)
|
I. First off, I never said I was "defending" Melon. Please, quote me on that. You can't even get that right. I said I was using the same sarcastic tone you had. I am not trying to convince anyone I was defending him, because I never was. Richard's 1st fabrication II. I wasn't hoping you'd put your tail anywhere except in your flapping, ignorant mouth. Risk teeth? You're really pulling for that board warrior Purple Heart, aren't you? My point about chests is not an obsession btw, it's an illustration that you personify. That of an ignorant blowhard, protected by something (friends, distance, rules, whatever), who ACTS tough to cover the fact that his arguments are baseless. He thinks his virtual chest thumping will intimidate the guy across the table. Gorillas do that to try and frighten others, which is why I think it's particularly sad to see a human apeing the ape, so to speak. When you can't substantiate your claims, you don't challenge someone to a fight over a computer BBS to cover your lack of a valid point. That ignorant, pathetic bravado may work against the little boys on the islands, but I see right through you. I see a weak little fella chest-thumping on the boards to distract attention from his lack of a coherent argument. Do you think that anyone here gives a crap about your "superior degree", height, or age? You can't argue successfully, so you try and list all these wonderful traits about yourself that you think give your BS assumptions credibility. I've got two Masters degrees, I'm 6'1", 210lbs, run my two mile in 10:26, and have completed military schools you can only read about. But does that give any credibility to my arguments? No, in fact it's no more than posturing. Fluff. You behave like a little barnyard rooster puffing up to show off for all the hens around. Right until the farmer comes up and rings your neck and replaces you, because you're impotent. Thinking your boasting is anything but pathetic posing = Richard's 2nd totally incorrect conclusion III. When did I say you were inexperienced with SPW@W? Not once. Quote me saying that, I dare you. Are you so slow, or having such translating difficulty that you can't understand what I'm saying? You're either an incredibly confused, or you don't know enough to shut your flapping lips. And THAT is what I was referring to. What REAL MINE CLEARING EXPERIENCE DO YOU HAVE? Not in a board game, not in a computer game. I'm talking about putting your hands on real mines. I asked you that, and you failed to answer the question. I suspected that you have ZERO experience, either as a soldier or more specifically with mines. Yet you insist on trying to sell yourself as an expert with your 1000 posts. Your game playing doesn't mean you know jack about reality kid, and you fail to realize the connection, or lack thereof. You sit there and play GAMES and think that gives you knowledge about proper mine clearing doctrine? I'll ask you once more: How can you say that the mine clearing is simulated "very close too" if you have no experience clearing mines, or knowing who's even trained to clear them? Answer that simple question. You've failed to so far, only puffing your (hairless or hairy) chest up to show just how tough you are. You thinking that number of posts or versions of SP played = real-world experience with mine-clearing tactics/techniques is pure ignorance personified, and Richard's 3rd asinine association. IV. Where did I address your nationality? I NEVER did, so don't try and play the "racist" angle. You're a dumbass, and I don't care which country you're from. Anyone who speaks out in volumes, holds their opinions to be facts, and attacks others for deflating their egos when they themselves have no CLUE what they're actually talking about is an ignorant ***. Plain and simple. Welcome to Richard's 4th failure to comprehend. V. quote:
jezzz what's that obsession with words? It's called knowing what the "f" you're talking about Richard, before you speak. Here's a definition for you: quote:
foot soldier n. A soldier who fights on foot; an infantry trooper. You don't even know what you're referring to when you speak. It's not an obsession with words, it's called being precise. And that’s Richard’s 5th failure to say what he means and flame someone else for pointing out his error VI. And while we’re on precision, you claim to know what you’re talking about. Dismissing a certain amount of knowledge as rudimentary, as not “Rocket Science”. If it’s so simple and straightforward, the why didn’t you know it’s not a “U2”, it’s a “V2”? That’s it Richard, keep talking like you’re an expert. Richard’s 6th screw-up, erroding his credibility In conclusion, if you're 41, you've got to wake up, and grow up. You carry on like a clueless child. You make up quotes, attribute them to me, and then attempt to rebut them, rather than do one simple thing. Tell me how, realistically, every crew in the game, either from weapon or vehicle, is suddenly knowledgeable in how to clear mines. Not just the Veterans, or your favorite the Elite, EVERY crew can clear mines. Is that realistic Richard? NO.
|
|
|
|