quote:

ORIGINAL: Clux

Currently the only thing "left" to get "right" its the oil/energy consumption

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuardsmanGary


I can help you with this. I'm pretty sure I just cracked the code on how fuel use is calculated. Refer to my post here for details:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4986717

To calculate fuel use with fuel efficiency you can take the number you get from that formula, multiply it by 10, and multiply that by the inverse of your fuel savings percentage. You can then either keep it as your final operational fuel cost or divide further by 10 to get the fuel cost per hex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueTemplar

Also, why did you limit the design roll fields to 50-151 ?

I have a Machinegun with 167% weapon design (123% structural, 157% base), and I don't think that tanks are any different ?

quote:

I didn't expect somebody to get a roll above 150%, but made corrections to the bugs than you reported so everything should work fine now

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuardsmanGary

Thanks for the credit.

There's an issue with designs heavier than 1949 weight returning incorrect fuel use values. I see that the highest weight band factor is 19 and any design that exceeds 1949 weight is shunted down to that factor. A heavy tank equipped with a beam gun, 300mm of liquid armour and a triple diesel engine, for example, is 1965 weight, so it should have a fuel use of 56 per hex, not 53.3 as reported by the sheet.

The heaviest design possible that does not use nuclear engines is a monitor tank with a combined beam gun, a triple heavy diesel engine and 400mm of either steel or liquid armour. This design is 2960 weight and falls into the 30th weight band. Before fuel efficiency it should use 101 fuel per hex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Clux

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuardsmanGary

Thanks for the credit.

There's an issue with designs heavier than 1949 weight returning incorrect fuel use values. I see that the highest weight band factor is 19 and any design that exceeds 1949 weight is shunted down to that factor. A heavy tank equipped with a beam gun, 300mm of liquid armour and a triple diesel engine, for example, is 1965 weight, so it should have a fuel use of 56 per hex, not 53.3 as reported by the sheet.

The heaviest design possible that does not use nuclear engines is a monitor tank with a combined beam gun, a triple heavy diesel engine and 400mm of either steel or liquid armour. This design is 2960 weight and falls into the 30th weight band. Before fuel efficiency it should use 101 fuel per hex.

Thanks! I extended the weight bands till 4000, hopefully thats beyond the hard limit

quote:

Thanks! I extended the weight bands till 4000, hopefully thats beyond the hard limit

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueTemplar

Until this [file size] issue is fixed, I recommend using software like Gimp or Paint.net, which allow you to not only resize a picture, but also set a custom compression for jpegs :
[image]https://incomepathfinder.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Compress-Image.jpg[/image]
P.S.: Outside image hosts tend to die at a different time than the forums, which can become very annoying when whole AARs or tutorials are suddenly rendered useless without their pictures.
P.P.S : Yes, I know how ironic it is that I'm using an outside picture myself.

quote:

Changelist for v1.08.06
[...]
-Assault Guns can now also use 200mm armour*