zgrssd -> RE: Hvy Walkers vs Hvy Armor (3/24/2021 2:47:57 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Uemon quote:
ORIGINAL: newageofpower Right now you can't efficiently use large numbers of Heavy Walkers because they currently don't have OOBs, while pure armor OOBs are some of the strongest offensive formations in game. Most Postures do not affect Heavy Walkers, or even only have a negative effect. Furthermore, Heavy Tanks can mount 300mm armor which significantly mitigates Heavy Guided RPGs, requiring large Vehicles or Nuke RPG to overmatch. Meanwhile, Heavy Walkers mount 200mm maximal armor, so are still very vulnerable to Heavy Guided RPGs. They have better (-massively- better with the optimizations) attack/defense stats and are great for Mountain/Jungle/City combat, but until we get a pure Walker OOB they're not going to outright replace armor. quote:
They have better (-massively- better with the optimizations) attack/defense stats and are great for Mountain/Jungle/City combat, but until we get a pure Walker OOB they're not going to outright replace armor. How does fuel use compare? (heavy walkers vs heavy armor) I am trying to get some data on how fuel consumption is calculated. Currently it appears that the primary factor is total weight. The engine itself has a surprisingly low impact on total fuel consumption. And in weight the Walker should have a advantage, with the lighter armor and weaponry.
|
|
|
|