Range by hex (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV



Message

William the Silent -> Range by hex (5/13/2021 10:45:36 PM)

The range for ranged units is given in kilometers.
Since the 0.25 km/hex was added is it not better to give range in hexes?

Btw. If I put artillery in an infantry unit (non ranged), does the artillery have the same effect in combat as when I put them in a ranged unit?



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 8:51:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: William the Silent

The range for ranged units is given in kilometers.
Since the 0.25 km/hex was added is it not better to give range in hexes?


I'm not sure what you mean. The range of equipment is given in kilometres, but the range of the unit is displayed in hexes.

quote:

Btw. If I put artillery in an infantry unit (non ranged), does the artillery have the same effect in combat as when I put them in a ranged unit?


No. We did a fair bit of testing on this:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4956581

In effect, the game treats ranged equipment in a non-ranged unit as if it's firing directly; net, this means that ranged equipment is about twice as effective if it's in a unit with a ranged icon.



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 11:55:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: William the Silent

Btw. If I put artillery in an infantry unit (non ranged), does the artillery have the same effect in combat as when I put them in a ranged unit?


Somehow physics changes and artillery uses the Bizzaro World physics model. [:D]



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 12:23:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

Somehow physics changes and artillery uses the Bizzaro World physics model. [:D]


It's not really a problem provided the designer is aware of it.



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 1:27:27 PM)

The following is simply an opinion.

Depends on what you are shooting for. TOAW could be called The Operational Art of Workaround. [:D]



governato -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 5:05:00 PM)

can you have double icons assigned to a unit? 'd that help ?



governato -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 5:06:10 PM)

can you have double icons assigned to a unit? 'd that help ?



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 5:52:19 PM)

You mean an infantry as the main and artillery as a secondary? Sure. I tried it once and when attacking with a unit arranged that way it always went off as a bombardment. [&:]



William the Silent -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 7:15:46 PM)

quote:

I'm not sure what you mean. The range of equipment is given in kilometres, but the range of the unit is displayed in hexes.

At 0.25 km/hex setting your lowest range is 1km. That translates into 5 hexes range.
But there is no option at 3 hexes or 7 hexes for instance.



William the Silent -> RE: Range by hex (5/14/2021 8:09:12 PM)

quote:

In effect, the game treats ranged equipment in a non-ranged unit as if it's firing directly; net, this means that ranged equipment is about twice as effective if it's in a unit with a ranged icon.

So you would put infantry guns, AT guns in a non ranged icon unit? AT guns and a 75mm in a tank operate in direct fire.
Designer choice.

Btw. that "ranged unit/non ranged unit artillery effect" topic helped me to understand the inner workings of the game better. It's a complicated game to understand, but with mainipulation of the tools you get (and understand) you can create a pretty realistic game (if you want that).

Without help from this forum you would get lost in trying to understand all workings of the game.
So thanks for all the replies always.



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/15/2021 5:29:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: William the Silent

At 0.25 km/hex setting your lowest range is 1km. That translates into 5 hexes range.
But there is no option at 3 hexes or 7 hexes for instance.


Well if you're at that scale you're going to have bigger problems. For example, how come you can't see the other troops two hexes over? That's only 500 metres and it's open ground.



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/15/2021 6:17:54 PM)

Maybe some day there will be line of sight in TOAW. But then might as well just build a whole new game.



William the Silent -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 12:42:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

Well if you're at that scale you're going to have bigger problems. For example, how come you can't see the other troops two hexes over? That's only 500 metres and it's open ground.

Recon: Skirmishers and cavalry screen.
Effective artillery range napoleonic actually was about 700 m.
And after some fighting you couldn't see much anyway through the smoke [:)]

But it actually is not a big issue for me. It's fine like it is.



rhinobones -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 2:58:40 AM)

quote:

For example, how come you can't see the other troops two hexes over? That's only 500 metres and it's open ground.


An adjustment to the Theater Recon value should be able to take care of the problem.



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 3:55:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones


An adjustment to the Theater Recon value should be able to take care of the problem.


No it won't. Theatre recon causes hexes to randomise to "observed" or "spotted" irrespective of whether any friendly units are nearby. So you either have a God's eye view or assume that there's smoke over the whole map all the time.

Personally I also think a Napoleonic game needs Napoleonic command and control, too. The great generals of the era figured out how to win battles even though their subordinates would not be under their direct control during the battle itself. If you have full command and control, you might as well be playing Age of Empires.



William the Silent -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 4:23:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones


An adjustment to the Theater Recon value should be able to take care of the problem.


Personally I also think a Napoleonic game needs Napoleonic command and control, too. The great generals of the era figured out how to win battles even though their subordinates would not be under their direct control during the battle itself. If you have full command and control, you might as well be playing Age of Empires.

I think TOAW IV has plenty of tools to make a realistic tactical napoleonic game. Little manipulation does a lot.

You are right about the command. And there was seldom a clear view on the enemy during battle. Napoleon send his heavy cavalry up the hill at Waterloo, because he thought Wellington was retreating or disordered. But he couldn't see. Part of Wellingtons strategy and fog of war. Once the french found out there were just unbreakable squares they still kept attacking. No commander stopped the suicidle action.
Nappy even didn't know if the troops approuching from the east were prussian or french.
Wellington had to trust Blucher to come to his aide (or be able to make it in time) and hold his ground. Had Blucher not come in time the battle would have been lost.

Blucher's action won the battle of Waterloo. So did Blucher's action at Leipzig. Very underrated general.

Austerlitz also was not a clear vision battle. Many pre battle orders and choices from sub commanders decided the battle.



Curtis Lemay -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 4:31:49 PM)

I'm still stumped as to what game (board or PC) Ben is thinking of that has aide-de-camp rules. For sure there are tons of pre-radio tactical games right here at Matrix that don't use any such factor. And board games generally don't even have fog-of-war.

If TOAW can do as well as the old board games I base them on, I'm happy.



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 4:52:48 PM)

I remember some of the games where they had us use screens to simulate fog of war. Don't cough or the fog dissipates. [:D]



Curtis Lemay -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 4:59:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

Don't cough or the fog dissipates. [:D]


And then there was the "map trampoline": A part of the map gets a bow in it, and, after being depressed for a while, suddenly pops concave - with a volcano spray of counters everywhere!



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 5:05:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

I'm still stumped as to what game (board or PC) Ben is thinking of that has aide-de-camp rules.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_in_Russia:_Borodino_1812

From 1987.



Curtis Lemay -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 5:09:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

I'm still stumped as to what game (board or PC) Ben is thinking of that has aide-de-camp rules.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_in_Russia:_Borodino_1812

From 1987.

Never heard of it. Can such games be devised? Sure. Have most Napoleonic games foregone such factors? Yep.



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 5:11:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


Never heard of it. Can such games be devised? Sure. Have most Napoleonic games foregone such factors? Yep.


I'm sure they have- because they're not interested in being accurate simulations.



Curtis Lemay -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 5:19:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


Never heard of it. Can such games be devised? Sure. Have most Napoleonic games foregone such factors? Yep.


I'm sure they have- because they're not interested in being accurate simulations.

Couriers are fast. Orders on a battlefield can be distributed fast enough to not really need simulation. Now, at the operational or strategic level...



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/16/2021 5:19:34 PM)

I remember the few times board game makers tried to simulate fog of war with a screen. Don't cough or the fog of war dissipates. [:D]



rhinobones -> RE: Range by hex (5/18/2021 10:49:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones

An adjustment to the Theater Recon value should be able to take care of the problem.


No it won't. Theatre recon causes hexes to randomise to "observed" or "spotted" irrespective of whether any friendly units are nearby.


A simple test shows that adjusting Theater Recon has the desired effect of revealing enemy troops across the front with declining observation at depth. Think this demonstrates that for any Theater Recon value the closer a unit is to the observer the more likely it is that it will be uncovered. Theater Recon does not appear to be a probability that operates equally across the battlefield.

If Theater Recon is not used, try loading units with a recon squad and test.


[image]local://upfiles/5722/DBB29A087CBD4D95890009FA82820A2C.jpg[/image]



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/19/2021 2:36:28 AM)

Do a test moving units too. [;)]



gliz2 -> RE: Range by hex (5/19/2021 4:01:15 PM)

Too much board gaming will kill (your common sense).

In reality most of the recon was done by probing and POWs interrogations.

My favourite story is of a IIWW general ordering his motor scout to get to the village to scold "own troops for shooting friendlies".
When they saw the scout being shot dead the general commented: "Well, seems they were actually shooting correctly".

Another good one is of US scouts getting through an enemy town and back reporting no enemy as the German CO ordered his troops to hide and let them through.
Trick paid out and many good men and some tanks were lost.



golden delicious -> RE: Range by hex (5/19/2021 5:21:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones


A simple test shows that adjusting Theater Recon has the desired effect of revealing enemy troops across the front with declining observation at depth. Think this demonstrates that for any Theater Recon value the closer a unit is to the observer the more likely it is that it will be uncovered. Theater Recon does not appear to be a probability that operates equally across the battlefield.


Your "simple test" has an extremely small sample size.

I tested a map with twelve units at 2 hexes, 18 units at 3 hexes and 24 units at 4 hexes distant. I set recon to 5% and observed the results for ten turns.

Total units visible:
Two hexes: 14 out of 120 = 11.7%
Three hexes: 30 out of 180 = 16.7%
Four hexes: 43 out of 240 = 17.9%

So a larger sample actually gives us an inverse relationship between the proximity to a friendly unit and the chance of spotting. I expect if we increased the sample size, though, that these differences would largely disappear and we'd find a more or less consistent chance of spotting any given hex on the map.



Lobster -> RE: Range by hex (5/19/2021 6:18:48 PM)

That make sense. The more units there are the higher probability you will observe something.



rhinobones -> RE: Range by hex (5/19/2021 7:54:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

Your "simple test" has an extremely small sample size.


Well, duh . . . that’s why it was called ‘simple”.

A couple of critical things you didn’t mention 1) scale and 2) whether the observed units clustered near the observer or were randomly dispersed. A picture of the test set up, and results, would be nice.

Regards



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.59375