AngularMan -> RE: 50mm Mortars way too strong? (5/26/2021 3:57:50 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961 Studies showed most ground battle casualties were due to arty, most of that being mortars. There is no doubt that mortars were very effective weapons in WWII, but there is a world of difference between the 5-cm-Gr.W. 36 and the 8-cm-Gr.W. 34. One of the most important difference is the range: in order to fire on the enemy with the 5cm mortar, one had to be well in the effective range of many direct-fire weapons, which means the 5cm mortar could be suppressed much more easily. Insert Numbers here! As you can see, shell production for the 5cm mortar dropped off sharply in 1941 never to recover, despite the weapon itself still being produced in large numbers until 1943, while the 8cm shell production exceeded it and soon increased to even higher numbers. If you then take into account that the weight of the shell of the 8cm mortar is roughly 4 times that of the 5cm mortar it becomes quite clear that the 8cm mortars had a much higher output than the 5cm mortars, even in 1941. So any studies proving the effectiveness of mortars are likely not referring to 5cm mortars. edit: for some reason I can't post the actual numbers or the link to the source until my 10th post, so you just have to trust me on that one ;)
|
|
|
|