mdsmall -> RE: Comments from recent play-through (6/19/2021 9:05:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FOARP - Russian morale rose as high as 178% by the end of the game. This kind of rise makes it impossible for the other side to ever recover and win - morale should be capped at 100%. Logically it makes no sense for people's happiness about the war to have no ceiling on it. I could see capping National Morale at 125% but not 100%. There should be a positive benefit to early campaign successes and the bonus in unit morale when national morale is above 110% provides that. It makes sense to me that if the war is going well, public support could rise to levels above where it was at the outbreak of the conflict. I agree though with your suggestion that the entry of minors should provide a small NM boost for their controlling major. In a similar vein, the surrender of major powers should reduce the mobilization of friendly aligned powers that have not yet entered the war. This is particularly true for the USA, which seems very sensitive to DOWs by either side but completely indifferent to surrenders. I have seen games against the AI where the USA finally entered the war on the Entente side on the same turn as France surrendered and the CP won the war. You would think that if the UK, France or Italy surrenders, it might give a U.S. Administration heading for war against Germany a reason to pause before moving to 100% mobilization.
|
|
|
|