RE: Soviet T1 moves (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> After Action Reports



Message

golden delicious -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (9/30/2021 8:00:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones

Larry

Looks like you’re a victim of the old “killer” first move. Wonder what Barbarossa would have been like if the Wehrmacht had a bunch of practice tries before the real assault. This is what’s expected when playing the same scenario multiple times. Everyone knows what’s coming and that is just the way the game is played. Maybe some random Soviet deployments would make the opening move more challenging.

What does bother me a little bit is the use of units in roles for which they were not designed or intended. In this game, and others before, MP, engineer, bridging and AA units are commonly deployed as deep reconnaissance maneuver units. I realize that this is all within the TOAW rules, but I find it unrealistic when an air defense or engineer unit makes a deep, unsupported, penetration behind enemy lines. Wish there was a way to make these units more valuable in their intended function so they wouldn’t be recklessly used in the deep reconnaissance or encirclement mode. Guess it’s a TOAW/scenario design issue.

Good shooting & best regards


Agreed. Generally I find the solution with the support units is to bundle them, so the MPs and AA go with the HQ. The HQ is going to want to be where most of the troops are anyway so this is more realistic.

In terms of the opening, I've said it before and I'll say it again: what's needed is a scenario that starts after the Wehrmacht was done chewing through the frontier armies. Then we won't be agonising over whether a panzer unit can reach Daugavpils on schedule, or over the perfect first turn, or whether the Soviets running away is realistic. Yes, researching such a scenario would be a lot more work- but it would save a lot of time of players going through the motions.



rhinobones -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (9/30/2021 8:08:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

. . . what's needed is a scenario that starts after the Wehrmacht was done chewing through the frontier armies.


My observation is that the greatest appeal of scenarios such as Barbarossa is playing the initial onslaught against an inferior force. Second would be playing the inferior force and denying the aggressor his pleasure. After the opening phase the game usually boils down to limited maneuver and brute force. This is true not only with Barbarossa, but others such as Italian Front - Caporetto 1917, Ardennes 1944 and Fulda 55 2.0. Starting the scenario after the initial phase has merit, but I think the designer would need to build in elements of maneuver and unpredictability in order for the scenario to escape the WW I brute force syndrome.

Maybe an alternate solution would be to add a Force 1 Theater Option on turn one to select either a historical scenario (as it is today) or a non-historical randomized scenario. Non-historical might add a few additional formations selected from a large pool, change supply levels, replacement levels, objective track, automatic R/R repair value or shock allocations. I think this would make the killer first turn more difficult and inject a bit of realistic “what-if”. Keep the scenario’s historical fidelity and add a bit of replay value. Just some thoughts.

Regards




larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (9/30/2021 11:07:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhinobones
quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious
. . . what's needed is a scenario that starts after the Wehrmacht was done chewing through the frontier armies.

My observation is that the greatest appeal of scenarios such as Barbarossa is playing the initial onslaught against an inferior force. Second would be playing the inferior force and denying the aggressor his pleasure. After the opening phase the game usually boils down to limited maneuver and brute force. This is true not only with Barbarossa, but others such as Italian Front - Caporetto 1917, Ardennes 1944 and Fulda 55 2.0. Starting the scenario after the initial phase has merit, but I think the designer would need to build in elements of maneuver and unpredictability in order for the scenario to escape the WW I brute force syndrome.

Maybe an alternate solution would be to add a Force 1 Theater Option on turn one to select either a historical scenario (as it is today) or a non-historical randomized scenario. Non-historical might add a few additional formations selected from a large pool, change supply levels, replacement levels, objective track, automatic R/R repair value or shock allocations. I think this would make the killer first turn more difficult and inject a bit of realistic “what-if”. Keep the scenario’s historical fidelity and add a bit of replay value. Just some thoughts.

Regards

What a wonderful sparkling conversation. Good ideas from everybody involved. You guys are hitting on all cylinders and everything you say is spot on. May I make a suggestion?
Elmer has 5 tracks for the PO....may I suggest we use all 5 for differing goals? Is there a way to chose which track is used at random? By an event or something?


[image]local://upfiles/16287/7CB8DB13FB57416CB006413CF05D2EE2.gif[/image]



rhinobones -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (10/1/2021 4:53:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

What a wonderful sparkling conversation. Good ideas from everybody involved. You guys are hitting on all cylinders and everything you say is spot on. May I make a suggestion?



Sometimes it’s difficult to determine whether a person is sucking up or genuinely being a good guy. With you Mr. Spooky, I have no doubt that you are one of the good guys.

In the editor I took a look at FITE2. All 5 tracks are used for the Axis side. However, the Allied side is only programed for track #1. This indicates that when the scenario is played in the solitaire mode, the design is for a Soviet (Cheyenne) opponent against the Axis PO. Hence multiple Axis tracks and only one Allied track. The singular Allied track appears to be a diagnostic troubleshooting track.

To answer your question, yes. Objective tracks can be selected using Theater Options or events. They can be triggered by turn, event or Theater Option. The trick for the scenario designer is to ensure that switching objective tracks does not violate the orders of the original objective track. As an example, track #1 directs a formation to go right, track #2 changes the direction to the left. The designer needs to make sure that these orders are congruent and do not cause the formation to make chaotic moves.

Regards




jmlima -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (10/1/2021 10:30:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious
...

Agreed. Generally I find the solution with the support units is to bundle them, so the MPs and AA go with the HQ. The HQ is going to want to be where most of the troops are anyway so this is more realistic.
...


That just turns HQs into really powerful front-line units.



golden delicious -> RE: Soviet T1 moves (10/1/2021 10:43:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jmlima


That just turns HQs into really powerful front-line units.


Really? With 12 MP squads and 36 AA guns you're going to put the HQ in the frontline going toe-to-toe with infantry regiments?

Add that one normally sticks the artillery in the HQ as well. You're going to want the HQ behind the line doing HQ stuff.



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T2 moves (10/6/2021 9:57:10 PM)

It's now T2 and Ken is arriving at Minsk already. I'm astonished that he got there so fast.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/CFCF1AB49C8E4C97A3A78D66747F29F4.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T2 moves (10/12/2021 4:18:29 AM)

Here's the T3 view of Minsk right now. Ken's units arrived last turn and now have managed to surround my valient defenders. I don't expect them to last very long.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/209FE3888478414F8075C47B0E63E7F8.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T3 moves (10/12/2021 4:32:02 AM)

I've started to park my AAA units on those river crossings that are vulnerable to air attack in an effort to encourage Ken to go bomb something else. Ken has dropped over a dozen of my bridges already. This is something I should have been doing since the beginning of the game.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/862AEEAE00214BEE9D67D88C7B5549FD.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T3 moves (10/17/2021 1:02:21 AM)

It's now T4 and Ken's units are now arriving at Pskov already. My roadblocks won't last long.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/A91BC3F6C27243B98F7DA77881E2B9BE.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T4 moves (10/17/2021 1:15:23 AM)

This is the Murmansk situation. The Axis units are slowly pushing my defenders backward and will be at the city in a few turns. I need to rail some more troops into this AO.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/E2083F72FA3F4B8A9502D1D04799F31B.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T4 moves (10/17/2021 3:21:43 AM)

I had occasion to rail 37 units of various kinds from the deep south areas near Turkey to near Rostov and I would have railed them to the extent of their MP's but I ran into a couple of busted bridges that Ken dropped either this turn or in one of the past four turns. Ken has been attacking my bridges like it's going out of style and my bridges are disappearing faster than a Russian journalist. I'm thinking of maybe building a huge tall thick wall around Moscow and making the Mexicans pay for it. I alone can fix it. And I'll make everyone wear a mask just because I can.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/9D1C8B9405B34458B39052E329F5D89A.jpg[/image]



rhinobones -> RE: Soviet T4 moves (10/17/2021 3:26:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

I would have railed them to the extent of their MP's but I ran into a couple of busted bridges . . .


Better hope the next round of air attacks aren't against your embarked units!

Regards



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T4 moves (10/17/2021 3:28:54 AM)

Holy $hit. I hadn't thought of that and now none of my aa units can move. D'oh.

[image]local://upfiles/16287/AAFB18E842E243BE971A793B04A86F4C.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T4 moves (10/26/2021 9:44:28 PM)

Ken has surrounded my valient defenders at Minsk and has moved on with the rest of his forces. I'm not going to be able to hold out for very long. He will soon own the city.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/D0B17B4F99F94B77B2251DC238621F11.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T5 moves (10/26/2021 9:49:46 PM)

Ken is getting closer and closer to Kiev. I'm putting garrisons at the crossings in an effort to delay them getting on the east side of the river. But he's got engineers and getting across the river should be no big problem for his forces.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/28E60524F8F1421D8E038EFE0834ACC0.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T5 moves (11/2/2021 10:03:33 PM)

Ken has gotten some of his Axis units across the river somehow and now Kiev is under threat. I'm thinking of railing some more folks into that area to deal with them.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/68BCEBA745614BA8B6A43A6895813F2E.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T6 moves (11/2/2021 10:14:47 PM)

Ken has defeated my defenders at Pskov and now the way to Leningrad is completely open.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/62BFA863E02347A7839A56ACB6962193.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T6 moves (11/3/2021 12:55:47 PM)

This is the front lines in T6
[image]local://upfiles/16287/E57E179774E6414B903C4B667FF10FE5.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T17 moves (11/12/2021 7:09:34 PM)

I have received Ken's T17 moves and watched the entire playback and he had over 34K events.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/C1297E2024C24A81818635FF24783B68.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T17 moves (11/17/2021 6:37:02 AM)

Here's the end of the playback of Ken's latest set of moves. I received it about noon and watched the whole thing. He's crushing me again.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/0CF38EDCDD574DB79DD124C56BE1B2BF.jpg[/image]



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T17 moves (12/5/2021 4:34:30 AM)

There seems to be something wrong with our equipment file. One of the items is labeled "EMPTY" and it seems to be some kind of RR arty or something. I could fix that easily but I need to know what to name it. Anybody have a preference?
[image]local://upfiles/16287/EA25F6A719204008AAE07E25558FB683.jpg[/image]



golden delicious -> RE: Soviet T17 moves (12/5/2021 2:56:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

There seems to be something wrong with our equipment file. One of the items is labeled "EMPTY" and it seems to be some kind of RR arty or something. I could fix that easily but I need to know what to name it. Anybody have a preference?


Gunny McGunface?

Judging by the HEAT rating and the defence value there's more going on here than an incorrect label, but since there are none in your OOB and none in replacements it doesn't seem critical to me.



larryfulkerson -> RE: Soviet T17 moves (12/23/2021 12:46:05 AM)

I have good news and bad news. The good news is that the development team has produced a new version and it needs to be tested before being released into the wild. I'm the one to test that bad boy so this AAR will come to an abrupt end. I'm posting about my test on the development board with the hope that they will eventually move it to the public board.
[image]local://upfiles/16287/242FACACAF154AF88AAC867C4B58FC14.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.142578