Gunnulf -> RE: Nach Moskau und zurück - Gunnulf (A) AtAtack (S) GC-No early end (12/3/2021 12:50:39 AM)
|
T50 Ostfront Well, apart from the Crimea and Leningrad bits, didn't have time to stitch them together but here is an overview after 50 weeks of fighting. We've hit 758 VPs to set a decent HWM for year one I think, anything from here on is gravy. 116vp's as bonus's for early capture, although we lost the 6vp bonus for Ryazan getting taken back (working as intended or should the Soviets get essentially free bonus Vps back with no time target for cities never taken historically?). As seen from the last 2 posts the enemy from here on in is starting to fight harder and its going to be a delicate balance to push further without wrecking our army. The rational thing might be to dig in and try to make it a difficult HWM to match, but where is the fun and glory in that? There is still a reasonable chance to take Stalingrad but I won't be surprised if its a hornets nest of forts all around by now. Maybe Grozny/Makhachkala is possible but further risks overexposure unless I commit at least another army to the south to clear south of Krasnodar. Tambov is probably doable as is Ryazan again, and in fact we could do a rope-a-dope in the south and focus some serious pressure on Moscow if he has committed hard to the south... But we can't do everything at once for sure, but nor can he. Probably... The whole Red army is 7m strong, despite 4.8m casualties in the first year of the war versus axis 0.8m, so approximately 6-1 losses overall. AFVs closer to 7-1 and our on map troops and vehicles seem relatively healthy for now... Most of the VVS is still training in the Urals but is a force to be feared in the near future I'm sure. [image]local://upfiles/43317/B9154C59AA55476F8A21EE922521D8D1.jpg[/image]
|
|
|
|