marty01 -> RE: Soviet Surrender...Control to UK? (12/2/2021 11:46:09 PM)
|
My question is "what is Russian Surrender" supposed to mean in terms of a reasonable historical context and the games environment. Obviously the USSR didn't surrender to Japan. But surrender presumably means something like a peace treaty with Japan following the capture of Omsk and some form of cease-fire line. So why would those big resource hexes on the western map edge switch to United Kingdom possession? And if surrender means a peace treaty of some sort, why should the Japanese be allowed to continue their advance west of Omsk -- i.e. keep moving the Japanese Army west after the Soviet surrender in order to capture these three big resource hexes? I did actually do just that against the AI. While it took me upwards of about 7 or 8-months to get the trans-Siberian RR repaired all the way to west map edge, it is possible to get these resources/production pts incorporated into the Japanese production cycle (albeit they are hit with the 1/3 rule multiplied by the Japanese production factor). But it begs the question -- at least in my mind -- do these resources/production pts get incorporated in the United Kingdoms production cycle when these hexes switch from Soviet to UK possession? If so why? The material and resources these three hexes represents would presumably be utilized by Soviets in their war against Germany rather than become a form of donation to the United Kingdom.
|
|
|
|