archmache -> RE: Is Russia too advantaged? (12/28/2021 6:10:07 PM)
|
According to the forums and my limited PBEM games, playing against a good Axis player is extremely difficult. USSR will lose upwards of 100 units before the tide swings. The eastern front will only start caving when OKH has to operate units out to deal with North Africa, Italy, and Normandy invasions. In regards to unit size I've found that the Army Group North, South, and Central are basically German spearheads that go to Minsk/Moscow, Leningrad, and Stalingrad (much like history). Since supply is so atrocious German units rarely are more than 1 or 2 hexes away from a city (unless they are attacking another city). What I'm getting at is that the fighting is laterally concentrated not vertically (in WW1 games you have a line from north to south) but in this game its basically forward or backwards and what happens on the edges is irrelevant because supply is so bad. In view of this it makes sense to have Armies as a unit since so many troops would be concentrated near the supply centers. I would not be opposed though to introducing a division level unit between a garrison and a corps, but they would be so weak they would have to operate in low supply or something to make them worthwhile. All in all though I think the Russians are balanced though.
|
|
|
|