Error in MWIF explanation of role of ENG in battle? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames



Message


Joseignacio -> Error in MWIF explanation of role of ENG in battle? (2/22/2022 4:02:02 PM)

This is what MWIF says. Note that engineers are granted a +1 when attacking a city

[image]local://upfiles/31818/585D36F10F1D46DAB7DC7706114A7BA0.jpg[/image]




Joseignacio -> RE: Error in MWIF explanation of role of ENG in battle? (2/22/2022 4:04:50 PM)

Here is an extract of the same RAW rules that MWIF offers:

quote:

Combat Engineers
Face-up ENG are not halved or thirded when attacking or overrunning across a river, canal or fort hexside. They also provide this benefit to as many land units they are stacked with as the ENG unit’s combat value. ENG attacking across both a river and a fort hexside, ignore only the fort hexside. The defender still has all other combat benefits if behind a fort hexside.

Engineers provide +1 to the land combat die roll (see 11.16.5) when attacking a 2 or 3 factory stack city. Defending engineers subtract 1 from the die roll when defending a 2 or 3 factory stack city. These benefits are in addition to the other benefits and can be used simultaneously (e.g. gaining both benefits when attacking across a river into a 2 factory city).

If an ENG provides any benefits in an attack, it always suffers the first loss (even before white print units attacking in winter).




Orm -> RE: Error in MWIF explanation of role of ENG in battle? (2/23/2022 6:52:54 AM)

Both are correct. This because one is the regular rule, and the other is with the 2d10 option that when in play replaces the regular rule.

+1 per ENG factor when attacking (or -1 when defending) a city is only in play with the 2d10.

The +1 to the land combat die roll when attacking a 2 or 3 factory stack city is the rule for playing with the 1d10.




Joseignacio -> RE: Error in MWIF explanation of role of ENG in battle? (2/23/2022 8:14:39 AM)

Wow thanks, I had never played with 1d10 in many years of WIF, I wouldnt have imagined.

Edit: Although those modifiers are in the 2d10 table explanations, as can be seen above.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.96875