m9 bazooka (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message

rjinwootton -> m9 bazooka (11/12/2003 1:11:56 AM)

pbem

anyone had a tiger taken out by us rangers (ubermenshen) at a range of 243 m?

this seems crazy to me

likewise a panzerfust can't hit a barn from 50m

any comments



Fallschirmjager -> (11/12/2003 1:18:10 AM)

Ive commented on this as well and been yelled down by certain members of this board
Apparently the Allies had ATGM tech in the mid 40's
The Pen is fairly accurate....but the accuracy is way too high

I do however wish that Panzerfausts be left alone
Ive talked to those that used them in combat....and they told me they were very inaccurate weapons and its why they let a squad member carry 5-7 in a sack strapped to their back and nothing else



Belisarius -> (11/12/2003 1:47:05 AM)

[QUOTE=rjinwootton]pbem

anyone had a tiger taken out by us rangers (ubermenshen) at a range of 243 m?[/QUOTE]

Yes... :rolleyes:

Panzerfausts should be inaccurate. They're just not very good at ballistics.



Gary Tatro -> To tell you the truth (11/12/2003 1:53:49 AM)

[QUOTE=rjinwootton]pbem

anyone had a tiger taken out by us rangers (ubermenshen) at a range of 243 m?

this seems crazy to me

likewise a panzerfust can't hit a barn from 50m

any comments[/QUOTE]
I have played with both, and yes the bazooka has better accuracy, I can not remember ever hitting anything beyond 100m.

As far as Panzerfusts I like them so much even when I play the Russians I take them over bazooka's any time. They have much higher penatration and I have noticed a difference in accuracy if you run or on a halftrack, but if you walk 50-100 meters to attack your enemy I have found I still hit pretty often.

Are you playing 7.1 or H2Hfr?

Also the M9 is better than the M1, in H2Hfr you can just barely pen on a tiger with an M1.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.71875