Ardennes Battle Questions (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message


Frank W. -> Ardennes Battle Questions (3/19/2004 3:34:36 PM)

1. As i read the americans had trouble with the weather in the ardennes. it was quite cold + snowing ( probably not as worse as like the eastern front ). how was the state of the soldiers winter equipment ?

2. how much was the impact of the british forces in the counter offensive of the allies ?




BruceAZ -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/19/2004 3:55:42 PM)

1. For those that had it, acceptable but few did especially in cut-off units.
2. Non-existent. Monty went on the defensive and I think Patton and others lead the rescue.

Recon
Semper Fi




Sturmpionier -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/19/2004 4:15:01 PM)

1) I did some work on this while in college. My basic conclusion was that the US Army logistics faced the same problem in the winter of 44-45 in Belgium that their German counterparts faced in the winter of 41-42 in the East. Both winters were noted for their harshness and both subject armies suffered from a lack of winter gear. In both cases, the subject army had really not been tested in winter warfare and the paucity of suitable equipment bore that fact out. The major difference was that the Americans had a greater quantity of goods and a much better road net to use for resupply. For example, Joes talked about layering their clothing to stay warm. Their German counterparts, on the other hand, talked about having to confiscate clothing. Also, more of them just froze to death. As testament to this, Patton commended the toughness of his men who had to attack in below zero temps and lacking a full compliment of winter gear.

2) The Americans bore the brunt of the German attack. The British still had many of their troops in Holland recovering or consolidating from the lowlands campaign in the fall of 44. The counterattack so both nationalities participate, with Americans pushing from the West and the Brits and Americans attacking the base of the salient from the North and South, respectively. The American 3rd Army (Patton) made the biggest gains, but the Brits helped cave in the bulge from the north as well.




Wild Bill -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/20/2004 6:57:01 PM)

Good answers here Frank. I would only add the following. The biggest problem for the Allies as to the weather is that many rushed in defenders such as the 101st at Bastogne arrived unequipped for cold weather. Have you heard the song about one of the troopers written by his Granddaughter as a tribute to him, "I'll never be Cold Again?" Its very moving, beautiful piece of work. You can find it in the music folder of the Mega Campaign Screaming Eagles.

For the Germans the bad weather was a hindrance. The snows did not really come down until about two days into the Battle of the Bulge, about the 18th. That meant bad roads for the Germans and little chance for moving forward except on the roads. No cross country racing here!

For the Allies, it was the lack of resupply and air support due to the inclement weather. Hitler and von Rundstedt were counting heavily on the weather to hold down Allied fighter bombers and cargo transports. With Bastogne and other places cut off, there was no hope of resupply.

It was not until December 23rd, a week into the Battle of the Bulge that the weather cleared. Then resupply and heavy air attacks sounded the death-knell for the abortive German counteroffensive.

AS to the British, very little was done offensively except in concert with the American 2nd Armored Division at the Meuse River on the northern edge of the Bulge on Christmas Day (See my Steel Shield scenario).

The 29th Armored Regiment covered the flanks of the 2nd and also protected the West Bank of the River against any incursions. Other than that, as has been stated, Monty was busy building a defensive perimeter in the north and did not concern himself with any major attacks at that point.

He did, however, later state publicly that the he and his British 2nd Army has largely saved the day. The Americans according to Monty were really unable to cope with the late German offensive and it was his timely intervention that saved American Ass.

Bradley, Hodges, and Patton were outraged and threatened to resign. Eisenhower at this point lost his cool and prepared to sack Monty once and for all. Becoming aware of this, Monty quickly sent off a profuse apology to Ike for his statements to the press. It barely did the job.

After that, Ike focused all major offensive efforts with the American 1st Army and let Monty stew in the north.

Politics and combat make strange bed fellows, and now I've talked much beyond the theme. Oh well! [>:]

Wild Bill




BruceAZ -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/21/2004 5:01:15 AM)

You are very right about Monty, Bill. Ike should have sacked him but instead of "being relieved", Monty would have ended up in Ike's HQ as some deputy as the "policticals" would have raised a ruckus. I think FDR would have stepped in and intervened for the usual reasons if Ike just canned him.

Anyway, history will give credit to Patton and the other US commanders for the German defeat but I vote for the weather - and airpower when the weather finally cleared - as the real victor.

Recon
Semper Fi




Frank W. -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/21/2004 1:50:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BruceAZ

You are very right about Monty, Bill. Ike should have sacked him but instead of "being relieved", Monty would have ended up in Ike's HQ as some deputy as the "policticals" would have raised a ruckus. I think FDR would have stepped in and intervened for the usual reasons if Ike just canned him.

Anyway, history will give credit to Patton and the other US commanders for the German defeat but I vote for the weather - and airpower when the weather finally cleared - as the real victor.

Recon
Semper Fi


yes, weather + air power.

also lacking supplies, to bad streets, to
unflexible command, not that good troops like the
years before...on the german side.

we must credit patton for reacting quite fast and
swinging his army for counterattack, also stubborn
american resistance helped to stall the offensive.

in the end it was only one more of hitlers weird
ideas in the 2nd half of the war.

also to the topic of monty: he was a good commander
for prepared battles, that did not need fast and
daring moves. seearnheim for attempt from him in
a daring operation. also i read in a book, that after the
el alamein battle monty could have sacked the AK if he
had moved faster and followed the retreating axis troops
more closly ( they were in a state of disorganisation
and monty gave them a pause to allow rommel to organize
proper movement to the west ).




Muzrub -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/22/2004 5:52:24 AM)

quote:

also i read in a book, that after the
el alamein battle monty could have sacked the AK if he
had moved faster and followed the retreating axis troops
more closly ( they were in a state of disorganisation
and monty gave them a pause to allow rommel to organize
proper movement to the west ).



I'm ready Hans Von Lucks book Panzer Commander now and he makes the same assertion. He also comments on Montys lack of daring during operation "Goodwood". According to Luck if Monty pushed faster the German lines would have collapsed becuase of a lack of infantry. He also makes comment that if Monty forced the issue during the race across France in 44 Germany would have been finished- they just didnt have ammunition or fuel to fight the allies.
But to be fair he also points the finger at the US too for not trying to engage German troops enough during the retreat.




John David -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/22/2004 7:04:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wild Bill

Good answers here Frank. I would only add the following. The biggest problem for the Allies as to the weather is that many rushed in defenders such as the 101st at Bastogne arrived unequipped for cold weather. Have you heard the song about one of the troopers written by his Granddaughter as a tribute to him, "I'll never be Cold Again?" Its very moving, beautiful piece of work. You can find it in the music folder of the Mega Campaign Screaming Eagles.

For the Germans the bad weather was a hindrance. The snows did not really come down until about two days into the Battle of the Bulge, about the 18th. That meant bad roads for the Germans and little chance for moving forward except on the roads. No cross country racing here!

For the Allies, it was the lack of resupply and air support due to the inclement weather. Hitler and von Rundstedt were counting heavily on the weather to hold down Allied fighter bombers and cargo transports. With Bastogne and other places cut off, there was no hope of resupply.

It was not until December 23rd, a week into the Battle of the Bulge that the weather cleared. Then resupply and heavy air attacks sounded the death-knell for the abortive German counteroffensive.

AS to the British, very little was done offensively except in concert with the American 2nd Armored Division at the Meuse River on the northern edge of the Bulge on Christmas Day (See my Steel Shield scenario).

The 29th Armored Regiment covered the flanks of the 2nd and also protected the West Bank of the River against any incursions. Other than that, as has been stated, Monty was busy building a defensive perimeter in the north and did not concern himself with any major attacks at that point.

He did, however, later state publicly that the he and his British 2nd Army has largely saved the day. The Americans according to Monty were really unable to cope with the late German offensive and it was his timely intervention that saved American Ass.

Bradley, Hodges, and Patton were outraged and threatened to resign. Eisenhower at this point lost his cool and prepared to sack Monty once and for all. Becoming aware of this, Monty quickly sent off a profuse apology to Ike for his statements to the press. It barely did the job.

After that, Ike focused all major offensive efforts with the American 1st Army and let Monty stew in the north.

Politics and combat make strange bed fellows, and now I've talked much beyond the theme. Oh well! [>:]

Wild Bill


Monty! This is the same guy who thought Operation My Freaking Big Ego...er I mean Market Garden was 90% successful .

IMO, most overated military man of the war.

Jackass!

JD




Major Destruction -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/23/2004 3:21:30 AM)

According to Eisenhower, the role given to 21st Army Group was defensive. The Ardennes battle was defensive. The German thrust had no hope of victory except in the remote chance that one of the large supply dumps was overrun.

The main supply dump was located at Liege, therefore all Montgomery had to do to win the battle was prevent its capture. This he did. But it seems that glorious accolades need to be bestowed on the daring and the brash.

In this ever selfperpetuating ego match between Monty and Patton, it could be argued that arrival of the armour at Bastogne was a non event. Even the commander of the garrison there, remarked that the Airborne Division defending the position didn't need to be relieved. Didn't he say something to the effect that airborne forces are supposed to be surreounded?[;)]

The German plan was to by-pass Bastogne in any event. This they did, channeling their precarious supply line along the only single east-west road worthy of the name. It was only when the 7th Armoured Division arrived in the town that it attracted more attention.

The battle of the Bulge was won in my opinion by the heroic delaying action of the US 110th Infantry Division. But since no big name General commanded that force, the glory is misplaced.




Wild Bill -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/24/2004 12:38:26 AM)

Yes, the 110th Regiment and units of the 9th Armored Division were sacrificed but did effectuate a delay to allow the 101st to get into place...just barely. The Germans were within a few miles of Bastogne and moving fast. Stuart is right. They intended to pass it, but with the 101st there, they had no choice but to fight for it.

The 101st did not stay inside Bastogne, per se, but in the towns surrounding, effectively creating roadblocks and eliminating the use of the area as a road hub. That really annoyed Hitler, Deitrich, and others and they wanted Bastogne badly. In fact for days after Patton had effected the breakthrough, the Germans STILL attempted to take the city. Talk about dogged determination!

WB




BruceAZ -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/24/2004 2:29:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Major Destruction

The battle of the Bulge was won in my opinion by the heroic delaying action of the US 110th Infantry Division. But since no big name General commanded that force, the glory is misplaced.


You are correct but Ms. History is always a fickle bride. It is up to historians to make sure they are not forgotten.

Recon
Semper Fi




Wild Bill -> RE: Ardennes Battle Questions (3/31/2004 5:19:55 PM)

Indeed, Recon! There are so many heroes, units that served with distinction that are overshadowed by the more popular units and battles.

The pages of history are so replete with examples of courage to the death by men whose names really never take the headlines.

Still, it behooves us who love history to find, learn and share info about them.

WB




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.421875