ravinhood -> RE: Grand Strategy game? (7/30/2004 2:08:49 AM)
|
Well, I liked SC, you really think WaW will be easier than that? Oh well matters not, in all fairness after patch 1.06 HOI wasn't that bad, but, after waiting a year and a half for that patch, it left me with sour apples for Paradox games. I like my games to work out of the box or at least within a few weeks to a month, no more. Now it would have been different if they had fixed all the bugs and flaws in patch 1.01 or 1.02, but, they didn't, and adding "new features" to later patches wouldn't have been a problem. But, many things in patch 1.05 and 1.06 should have been in the origional game and not a patch. Sooooooooooooo, I will stick with Matrix, Hps, and Shrapnel and Creative Assembly games from now on and may take a stab at one outside game called "Take Command 1861", looks like Civil War:TW to me and very detailed graphics of the battles. Now, if Matrix would just release something I have been waiting to play for way too long now, Cross of Iron, Battles in Normandy, that Napolean Empires game, and some Africa Korps game, I think that would tide me over until next year about this time. When I'll be looking for World at War and World in Flames. World in Flames is really the one I think will surpass HOI in replay value, MP value and accuracy value. I was looking at the new Axis and Allies remake game, but, it's patterned after Rise of Nations, and I was hoping it would be patterned after the Total War engine. I really hate real time micromanagment games.
|
|
|
|