fjbn -> RE: Ceded provinces and inestability (11/15/2004 3:11:49 PM)
|
I dont think so. First. Ceded provinces had their corps. I mean, they had the corps belonging to their major power. Minor countries were all under the influence of some major power. For example, Napoles under Spanish control until late XVIII. You say that ceded provinces suffer the lack of direction to provoque a revolt. I desagree. They had a political direction, the only one that people really obbey, their natural sovereigns. So, if you take Tyrol as a ceded, people always remain loyal to Austria. If you remember history you will see that kings always made a difference between territories. Itīs not the same for France to lose Lille (considered a French city) that other territories, no matter if they were historically under French influence, because they were not considered French. Prussia always tried to recover Magdeburg more than other territories recently gained.
|
|
|
|