|
BCtheQB -> RE: Defense logic (3/21/2005 1:21:10 AM)
|
in certain formations yes, but in these formations, and these are just the first 4
I came up with off the top of my head, Id label them but Ive been in
over 14 programs that called them all something different
X............T..G..C..G..T..TE
........H............Q.....................Z
...................... F
X.................T..G..C..G..T..TE
.....Z...H...............Q............
.......................... F
X............T..G..C..G..T............Z
............H........Q.........Y
..................... F
X.................T..G..C..G..T................TE
.....Z...H...............Q............
.......................... F
which side is a strength is debatable depending on run or pass ,
this is why I mentioned the greatest threat,
because in the 1st two formations,
the run strength is one side,
and the pass strength is on the other,
and the 3rd formation there is no conventional
TE, and if you align solely on the TE
regardless of other factors, the 4th formation
Trips open, with TE flexed will kill you
because the TE is neither the run or pass strength
and if you wind up playing say a Cover 3 strong zone,
a covrage designed to avoid formational overload mismatches
you tell your corners outside 3rd, great
you tell your free safety deep mid, great
but if you tell your SS to line up on the TE,
you LOSE against the bottom 3 formations
im not saying its something a coach cant figure out, AND HAD BETTER GO OVER with his players, but you can easily see how something so simple, and integral to the game
can be malsupported or unsupported altogether in a sim
if the cpu is picking the strength,
I need to know what its based on
but too simple a rule,
with obvious exceptions everywhere
fertilizes the field
that AI busters grow in
|
|
|
|
