US Losses in WW2 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


Nemesis -> US Losses in WW2 (3/21/2005 1:27:17 PM)

I have been trying to find some information about US losses during WW2, divided in to different theater of operations. Did US lose more men fighting the Japanese or the Germans? try as I might, I can't find that piece of information anywhere.




itsjustme -> RE: US Losses in WW2 (3/21/2005 7:42:02 PM)

No where close.

US dead were @ 300,000. Not sure what the total casualties were.

The figures for Japan and Germany vary wildly and depend on whether you include the civilian population in the casualties (particularly, late in the war it is difficult to know, e.g. the Red Army's venture into Prussia was a massacre). Suffice it to say it was in the millions.

Then there are the Russian's which bore far and away the greatest number of casualties.




Reiryc -> RE: US Losses in WW2 (3/21/2005 8:03:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: itsjustme

No where close.

US dead were @ 300,000. Not sure what the total casualties were.

The figures for Japan and Germany vary wildly and depend on whether you include the civilian population in the casualties (particularly, late in the war it is difficult to know, e.g. the Red Army's venture into Prussia was a massacre). Suffice it to say it was in the millions.

Then there are the Russian's which bore far and away the greatest number of casualties.


Uh, I believe he is asking the number of US losses against the japanese and the numbers of US losses against the germans to determine which theater the US suffered the most losses in.

He isn't comparing total losses of the US vs the axis forces.




timtom -> RE: US Losses in WW2 (3/21/2005 8:35:45 PM)

Two separate official casualty figures exist for the US Army, as both the Adjutant General and the Medical Department were responsible for tallying casualties. However, they both land in the 825,000 area casualty-wise. This figure includes the USAAF, which of course was administratively part of the Army.

Using the Medical Department's figures, the precise number is 829,556 casualties, including 229,832 battle deaths. This latter figure, however, also includes 14,298 deaths among POW's. Some additional 76,000 died from disease or accidents.

About 80% of Army casualties were sustained in Europe. Of the four main theatres, the ETO alone accounted for 516,508. The MTO tally came to 143,379, the SWPA 82,791, and the POA 46,116. Thus, Army battle casualties in the Mediterrenian exeeded those of the entire Pacific.

The USMC suffered 87,788 casualties, almost exclusively in the Pacific, and including approximately 19,000 dead. I don't have any figures for the Navy, only I know the death toll was about 40,000.

Almost 70,000 WWII US servicemen remain listed as MIA, most of whom, presumably, are dead. As far as I can tell, the MIA don't figure in any of the above numbers.










Nemesis -> RE: US Losses in WW2 (3/22/2005 12:17:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: timtom

Two separate official casualty figures exist for the US Army, as both the Adjutant General and the Medical Department were responsible for tallying casualties. However, they both land in the 825,000 area casualty-wise. This figure includes the USAAF, which of course was administratively part of the Army.

Using the Medical Department's figures, the precise number is 829,556 casualties, including 229,832 battle deaths. This latter figure, however, also includes 14,298 deaths among POW's. Some additional 76,000 died from disease or accidents.

About 80% of Army casualties were sustained in Europe. Of the four main theatres, the ETO alone accounted for 516,508. The MTO tally came to 143,379, the SWPA 82,791, and the POA 46,116. Thus, Army battle casualties in the Mediterrenian exeeded those of the entire Pacific.

The USMC suffered 87,788 casualties, almost exclusively in the Pacific, and including approximately 19,000 dead. I don't have any figures for the Navy, only I know the death toll was about 40,000.

Almost 70,000 WWII US servicemen remain listed as MIA, most of whom, presumably, are dead. As far as I can tell, the MIA don't figure in any of the above numbers.


That's the kind of information I was looking for. thank you for your help [:)]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.5