new wargame (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945



Message

andy11 -> new wargame (5/27/2005 5:59:33 PM)

Did you see this?

www.microgeo.pl

(in polish)
http://www.gry-online.pl/S013.asp?ID=19839
http://gry.o2.pl/zapowiedzi/?co=pokaz&id=368



Iridium -> RE: new wargame (5/27/2005 6:04:39 PM)

Yes, the only thing that bothers me about this game is that it reminds me of Empire Deluxe. Which is pretty bad when it comes to graphics. Not that I need great graphics but I thought we were beyond that day and age...[:D]



testarossa -> RE: new wargame (5/27/2005 7:58:46 PM)

So we have WitP, Polish guys are making War across Pacific (I hope it will be around $10 or shareware), and Russians are making Pacific Storm (english demo will be available in June). I'm in heaven.[:D]






Monter_Trismegistos -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 4:15:14 PM)

As far as i know.... it will cost 35$...



ETF -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 5:00:12 PM)

Has anyone tried it?
Would be interested in a comparison to Witp.........



wild_Willie2 -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 7:57:52 PM)

Hi, guys. We have been over this game in a tread last month


See This page


http://www.matrixgames.com/default.asp?URL=http%3A//www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp%3Fm%3D833449%26mpage%3D2%26key%3D%26%23833866



Rob Brennan UK -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 8:08:20 PM)

Hmmmm "Midway first carrier battle ever"

dosn't cover the coral sea then ? :)

I usually dont mind bad graphics but these look like it was programmed in the late 80's ! there is no excuse for that these days.

just my 2c



LittleJoe -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 9:03:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Hmmmm "Midway first carrier battle ever"

dosn't cover the coral sea then ? :)

I usually dont mind bad graphics but these look like it was programmed in the late 80's ! there is no excuse for that these days.

just my 2c



Im not fussy about graphics eiether, but that does look appalling, and quite frankly i wouldnt buy it jus because of the graphics, they look really appalling.

Im happy with witp thank you :)



Blackwatch_it -> RE: new wargame (5/28/2005 10:27:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleJoe

Im happy with witp thank you :)


I'm stunned.... [X(] not "I'm happy, but I want this and this changed"? You are one of a kind.[:-]

OK it's a hot day and I'm waiting for some turn in my mail[8D]



Wolftrap -> RE: new wargame (5/29/2005 1:14:46 AM)

My turns ready. Feel free to take your aggression out on me. :)



Blackwatch_it -> RE: new wargame (5/29/2005 2:21:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolftrap

My turns ready. Feel free to take your aggression out on me. :)

doing now[sm=00000106.gif]



testarossa -> RE: new wargame (5/29/2005 5:16:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK
I usually dont mind bad graphics but these look like it was programmed in the late 80's ! there is no excuse for that these days.
just my 2c


Exactly! Our modders made better maps and unit graphics (for free).



LargeSlowTarget -> RE: new wargame (6/6/2005 2:26:32 PM)

Okay, graphics suck - but so what, I still play Empire Deluxe occasionally [:'(]. And I noticed at least one feature in this game which WitP doesn't have - it allows putting at least two Admirals in the same TF. And in conrast to WitP, this game will run on my stoneage laptop I'm forced to use for providing me with the life-saving doses of computer games when I'm out of town [:)].



testarossa -> RE: new wargame (6/6/2005 8:01:08 PM)

Well, I'm still palying Carriers at War. I didn't pay for it 35 bucks though.



TulliusDetritus -> RE: new wargame (6/6/2005 8:11:27 PM)

Name: War across the Pacific 1941-1945
System requirements: Windows 95 / 98 SE / ME / 2000 / XP
Processor: 200 MHz
Ram Memory: 32 MB
Video Card: 2D
DirectX: any
DVD/CD-ROM: any
Sound Card: any
Free Hard Drive Space: 15 MB
Internet: 1 kbit
Display: 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768

15 miserable megas?? Is this true or just an errata? [>:]



Iridium -> RE: new wargame (6/6/2005 9:36:27 PM)

15 megs sounds about right...most programs these days are all graphics (the main reason games are reaching 2 gigs now). Must be a conspiracy to make ppl buy bigger HD's...[:D]



andy11 -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 12:29:49 AM)

http://grypc.com/content/view/638/75/



sfbaytf -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 12:49:33 AM)

I loved Empire Delux. There was another game sorta like ED with the same sort of cheesy graphics that I can't recall. It covered Guadacanal and the South Pacific. The one thing I remember was when you bombarded an island you you would see the island with building and you could see the shells from bombarding ships hitting stuff. This game came out around the mid 90's...



Gem35 -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 1:04:53 AM)

sorry, but that game looks retarded. Those graphics are atrocious and the script is in bad english. what a joke.



MkXIV -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 1:06:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sfbaytf

I loved Empire Delux. There was another game sorta like ED with the same sort of cheesy graphics that I can't recall. It covered Guadacanal and the South Pacific. The one thing I remember was when you bombarded an island you you would see the island with building and you could see the shells from bombarding ships hitting stuff. This game came out around the mid 90's...


PTO II?



sfbaytf -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 1:16:15 AM)

nope that's not the game I was thinking of.



Bombur -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 1:37:28 AM)

It was QQP Battles of South Pacific (or something like that). Interesting game, very similar to Gray Grigsby´s War in South Pacific (in design, not in graphics)



sfbaytf -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 1:49:11 AM)

YES!! That's it!! You can actually still download it for free. SSI also put out a pretty decent carrier battle sim in the Mid -90's. Don't know how Battle in the SOuth Pacific and the SSI game will run on newer OS's.



Tankerace -> RE: new wargame (7/1/2005 2:47:04 AM)

The game looks promising (graphically appaling however). I think had it come before WitP, or maybe before UV I would pick it up, but in 9/10 ways WitP seems to be superior, and if I already have it, that wakes WAP a bit superflouous.

That said, WAP is a good low cost alternative to WitP. I think had it been released 10 years ago, where it would be competing with say PTO 2, it would be great. But in 2005, I think its a wee bit outdated.



andy11 -> RE: new wargame (7/24/2005 9:12:14 AM)

http://gry.gery.pl/main.php?ID=newsy&N=2586



testarossa -> RE: new wargame (7/24/2005 10:15:12 PM)

This was handy, man. We all know Polish here.

[image]local://upfiles/14153/88F3BCB9AF284610AF4555F6B186386B.gif[/image]



Monter_Trismegistos -> RE: new wargame (7/24/2005 10:34:40 PM)

Actually I know Polish...

:]



Nomad -> RE: new wargame (7/24/2005 10:44:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Monter_Trismegistos

Actually I know Polish...

:]


I would hope that someone from Gdansk would know some Polish. [:D]

Wasn't there an English version of the web site? [&:]



Bodhi -> RE: new wargame (7/25/2005 12:10:23 AM)

"andy11"'s posts, both here and on wargamer.com, usually read either "Did you see this" and then a link to the site, or just a link to the site. He never seems to posts in any other thread, or any other type of message. I guess he must be in charge of marketing for the game. [;)] Pity he doesn't spend more of his time getting the info translated so that it's accessible to a few more people.



andy11 -> RE: new wargame (8/15/2005 12:55:41 PM)

http://gry.wp.pl/core.html?filtr=1,0&x=nowinki,10,21421&ticket=1055360771270054%2FKU6yxnnfcc31jSqdcaoi%2BdNLs8LUX0Yig0Y84KYXRYbeOsw4nq27kzkbxkpxT3u%2FmQKW63rVh1TlWuD7vzX5lgAbveQDJ%2FJ%2B6npDqvOrdrZQfNugi9l8Ku9gY%2FVvrZ%2F



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.703125