RE: 2.42B revisited

RE: 2.42B revisited (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific

Message

Forwarn45 -> RE: 2.42B revisited (4/19/2006 10:23:43 PM)
quote: Hello... Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit. Bye... Michael Wood That's great news. I look forward to trying a PBEM at that point if I don't give in and try before then. [;)]

DEB -> RE: 2.42B revisited (4/23/2006 12:45:23 AM)
quote: I'm having an interesting bug attack... A Japanese unit trying to disengage from battle on the beach near Lunga boarded one of my Allied submarines. I had 1300 Japs on a sub that can only carry 24 passengers. At first I didn't even notice that they were enemy troops and almost took them back to Nomea. Now I've spent about two weeks trying to get the drunken renegade Japs to get off my boat! I'm contemplating just sending the stupid thing back to pearl (Japs & all) & just intern them as POWs for remainder of scenario. Mr Wood - Something else to work on! ( Copy forwarded in case you have not seen it. )

Skyfire7631 -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/27/2006 9:50:21 PM)
Ok, I wouldn't want to bump this but .... erhh ... ok ... I DO want to bump this : BUMP ! [;)] Regards.

DEB -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/29/2006 2:44:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DEB quote: ORIGINAL: Mike Wood Hello... Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit. Bye... Michael Wood Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o] Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea". Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also? < Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM > Ummm ! Is it really over 14 months since the above was posted. it appears so ! Any update/news Mr Wood ?

Mike Wood -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/29/2006 7:49:42 PM)
Hello... No news. Working on secret game, right now... Michael Wood quote: ORIGINAL: DEB quote: ORIGINAL: DEB quote: ORIGINAL: Mike Wood Hello... Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit. Bye... Michael Wood Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o] Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea". Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also? < Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM > Ummm ! Is it really over 14 months since the above was posted. it appears so ! Any update/news Mr Wood ?

Mike Wethington -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/29/2006 8:18:39 PM)
Secret game? Something about Bletchley Park (you too can be Alan Turing!) or Purple? The long awaited PC port of TSRs Spies!? [sm=00000116.gif] How about a good strategic level sim of WWI or the American Civil War ala WitP? We all await news.

Skyfire7631 -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/29/2006 11:01:12 PM)
Secret game ? Hmmm, yummy [:)] But what about a little last patch for UV before being commited too much with that secret game, hey ? [;)] Regards.

DEB -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/30/2006 3:18:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Skyfire76 But what about a little last patch for UV before being commited too much with that secret game, hey ? [;)] Regards. Well said that man ! [sm=00000436.gif] ( Of course the secret game could be UV mind !! ) [X(]

TAIL GUNNER -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/30/2006 9:37:23 AM)
quote: Hello... No news. Working on secret game, right now... Michael Wood Any chance of giving Joe and Don a shot at it? (the UV patch that is)

Skyfire7631 -> RE: 2.42B revisited (6/30/2006 10:36:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DEB Well said that man ! [sm=00000436.gif] ( Of course the secret game could be UV mind !! ) [X(] Hmmm, good point ... If that's the case, I take back what I said [:D] Errh, come to think of it, no, actually : I'd still like a last patch for UV [;)] Regards.

DEB -> RE: 2.42B revisited (7/2/2006 3:34:46 AM)
Me too - it's been a long, long, long wait [>:] [>:] [>:]; and with little news / comment to sustain it .[:@] As with the English Banking system; everything is aimed at the new account ( game ) , and the existing customer is only an afterthought. [sm=00000018.gif] Still, better late than never if it does get done, just hope I'm still alive .[sm=00000280.gif]

DEB -> RE: 2.42B revisited (7/21/2006 1:02:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mike Wood Hello... No news. Working on secret game, right now... Michael Wood quote: ORIGINAL: DEB quote: ORIGINAL: Mike Wood Hello... Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit. Bye... Michael Wood Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o] Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea". Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also? < Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM > Ummm ! Is it really over 14 months since the above was posted. it appears so ! Any update/news Mr Wood ? Re the recently announced UV "Delux"etc. ; is a UV patch ( 2.43 ? ) scheduled anywhere in the planning for this ? ( I presume the known bugs will need to be fixed for any "new" game. )

Mike Wood -> RE: 2.42B revisited (7/21/2006 6:25:04 AM)
Hello... No news on patch. Working on [not so] secret game, right now UV "Deluxe" working title is Carrier Force. No details or release estimates. Was not going to mention game, until Joel mentioned it at the 2By3 site. Bye... Michael Wood quote: ORIGINAL: DEB Re the recently announced UV "Delux"etc. ; is a UV patch ( 2.43 ? ) scheduled anywhere in the planning for this ? ( I presume the known bugs will need to be fixed for any "new" game. )

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.953125