Mike Scholl
Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003 From: Kansas City, MO Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nikademus well by WWII the Okie was more around 33,500 tons off the top of my head. Then again an Iowa loaded down would approach 50,000 tons. Back in their day (around 1915ish) the Nevada and her sister "Standards" were among the largest BB's of their day (if not the largest) The USN had the luxury of time and generous resources (governed by Congress of course) and poured money into the BB's. Course it wasn't all simply for fighting.....creature comforts and other minor details factored in as well. You need to remember another US invention..., "All or nothing armor". Most nation's were slaping various thicknesses of armor on BB's wherever thay could. About the time of the Nevada's design, some bright ship designer in the US figured out that if the armor didn't stop a shell, all it did was to give it something hard enough to trigger the rather unsensitive AP fuse and increase the damage. So US design shifted to either puting the heaviest possible armor in place, or none at all. The Iowa's were designed with extrordinary length to beam ratios to allow that 33 knot speed, but a lot of that length was without belt armor (and it's weight), relying on compartmentalization to limit any damage. The Oklahoma's belt covered a much higher percentage of her length, making the weight difference less than might be expected by just looking at the size. Okie's weight, like most of the BB's of that era, was increased during the 20's and 30's when extra deck armor, torpedo bulges, and other improvements were incorporated to correct deficiencies revealed during WW I
|