Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 6:42:31 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
I repeated it all tomorrow, on 23rd:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10
Ki-27 Nate x 3
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 20
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 4

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 9
B-25C Mitchell x 39
IL-4c x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 4 damaged
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 damaged
Ki-21 Sally: 2 destroyed
Ki-48 Lily: 1 destroyed
Ki-46-II Dinah: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged
B-25C Mitchell: 3 destroyed, 10 damaged
IL-4c: 1 destroyed, 13 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
14 casualties reported

Runway hits 14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4
Ki-27 Nate x 2
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 10
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2

Allied aircraft
Catalina I x 3
Wellington III x 75
Hudson I x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
Ki-27 Nate: 2 destroyed
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 6 destroyed
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed
Ki-48 Lily: 3 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed
L3Y Tina: 3 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 5 destroyed
Ki-46-II Dinah: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 4 destroyed, 35 damaged
Hudson I: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
97 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 61

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4
Ki-27 Nate x 1
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 9
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 1

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 10
B-24D Liberator x 36

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed
Ki-27 Nate: 5 destroyed
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 6 destroyed
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 2 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 7 destroyed
L3Y Tina: 2 destroyed
Ki-48 Lily: 5 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed
Ki-46-II Dinah: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 9 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 4
Runway hits 89

121 to 22 in air losses today, so, I destroyed 320+ aircraft in two days.

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 121
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 6:52:17 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Then, I made my only mistake in my "Christmas Indian air campaign" - as it will be known in history books. It was costly, and stupid mistake, of the kind that makes your blood boil, realising you could have prevented it if only you used your brain...

By now, I feel I know BossGnome for quite a long time, so I know to recognise small psychological hints. When he accompanies his turn with: "merry christmas 42... " I guess the turn wasn't that good for me.

By basing all my fighters in Akyab, I was inviting disaster. I thought he may be sending his bomber strikes vs Akyab (most other bases are out of Sally reach, and I doubt he'd risk his valuable naval bombers for such a trivial task). I *completely* forgot about his CA based surface force from Rangoon. Personally I would most probably never have sent it to bomb Akyab, and so I forgot to even think about it.

Akyab had no defence vs surface bombardment, no CD guns, no surface force to react...






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 122
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 6:53:38 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Result:

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/24/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4
Ki-27 Nate x 9
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 11
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2

Allied aircraft
Catalina I x 4
Wellington III x 53
Hudson I x 13

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Ki-27 Nate: 4 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 6 destroyed
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 2 destroyed
Ki-48 Lily: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 1 destroyed, 25 damaged
Hudson I: 1 destroyed, 8 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase hits 1
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Akyab, at 30,29


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire Vb: 27 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 9 destroyed
Hurricane II: 17 destroyed
Beaufort V-IX: 6 destroyed
SB-2c: 7 destroyed
Fulmar: 2 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Kiji
DD Nokaze
DD Yakaze
DD Akikaze
DD Hakaze
DD Okikaze
DD Harukaze
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Usugumo
DD Shinonome
DD Akatsuki
DD Nenohi
DD Asashio
DD Kuroshio
DD Akizuki
CL Jintsu
CA Ashigara
CA Chikuma


Allied ground losses:
808 casualties reported
Guns lost 7
Vehicles lost 1

Airbase hits 29
Airbase supply hits 21
Runway hits 253

I lost 141 aircraft to his 32 that day

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 123
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:00:00 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Even worse than aircraft losses as such, was that the whole idea of my air offensive became questionable. Main goal was to reclaim skies over Akyab, but how can I do that if the airfield itself is wrecked and fighters destroyed???

By bombing offensive began losing momentum, with aircrews tired, and many aircraft requiring maintenance.

I reacted by forming huge transport force in Madras (Madras is my main base for anything that floats in the region), to go to Diamond Harbor and load some RN base forces (only units with CD guns in the region, as my predecessors managed to lose all dedicated CD units before I took over), and engineers.

I also sent my surface TF, based around two UK BBs, to Akyab. They will act under fighter umbrella during the day, and stop his bombardments during the night.



_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 124
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:03:22 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Very bravely, he bombarded Akyab tomorrow too:

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/25/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Akyab, at 30,29


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire Vb: 8 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 3 destroyed
Swordfish: 2 destroyed
Beaufort V-IX: 4 destroyed
Hurricane II: 7 destroyed
Fulmar: 2 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Kiji
DD Nokaze
DD Yakaze
DD Akikaze
DD Hakaze
DD Okikaze
DD Harukaze
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Usugumo
DD Shinonome
DD Akatsuki
DD Nenohi
DD Asashio
DD Kuroshio
DD Akizuki
CL Jintsu
CA Ashigara
CA Chikuma


Allied ground losses:
221 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

Airbase hits 13
Airbase supply hits 6
Runway hits 138
Port supply hits 1

Destroyed one of my subs:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Andaman Island at 23,34

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 17

Allied Ships
SS KIX, hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

He started massing Tonies in Rangoon, as my strikes became weaker and weaker:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3
Ki-27 Nate x 7
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 7
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 32

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 6
B-24D Liberator x 29

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 damaged
Ki-27 Nate: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 13 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 4 destroyed
B-24D Liberator: 6 destroyed, 8 damaged

Runway hits 2

My airstrike vs his bombardment force:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 27,32


Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 33


Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 5 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Chikuma, Bomb hits 1
CL Jintsu
DD Akatsuki
DD Okikaze, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CA Ashigara
DD Kuroshio, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Nenohi, Bomb hits 1, on fire

Hey at least something...



_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 125
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:05:14 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Tomorrow, another sub lost, I pull back my Dutch subs around Andamans:

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/26/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Andaman Island at 23,34

Japanese Ships
DD Nokaze
DD Yakaze
DD Akikaze
DD Hakaze
DD Harukaze
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Usugumo
DD Shinonome
DD Akatsuki
DD Asashio
DD Akizuki

Allied Ships
SS KXIII, hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

Attacks on Rangoon getting weaker and weaker:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 2
Ki-27 Nate x 26
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 7
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 35

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 7
B-25C Mitchell x 33
IL-4c x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-27 Nate: 1 damaged
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 1 destroyed, 8 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
B-25C Mitchell: 2 destroyed, 6 damaged
IL-4c: 3 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x Blenheim IV bombing at 4000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 2
Ki-27 Nate x 26
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 4
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 25

Allied aircraft
Catalina I x 4
Wellington III x 43
Hudson I x 10

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Ki-27 Nate: 3 damaged
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 4 damaged
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 2 destroyed, 11 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Catalina I: 1 damaged
Wellington III: 13 destroyed, 17 damaged
Hudson I: 3 destroyed, 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
37 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Runway hits 7


_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 126
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:07:02 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Seeing Tony opposition becomes stronger during the day, I switch to, rather desperate, night attacks:

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/27/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34


Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 3


Allied aircraft losses
IL-4c: 1 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x IL-4c bombing at 3000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34


Allied aircraft
B-24D Liberator x 4


No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Kuroshio, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

This is hit on one of his damaged DDs. All in all, his DDs suffer greatly in all his operations and I guess he'll run out of good DDs by early 44 if he continues using them like he does now.

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 127
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:09:04 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
28th, more attacks vs Rangoon. These are now really weak attacks, but I must keep the pressure as I need to buy time to bring CD guns and engineers to Akyab, and rebuild the field there, fighter squadrons too (to protect my BBs). All this is slowly moving, and thankfully he never launched massive Betty strike vs my Akyab based BBs (now that would be nasty).

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/28/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 9
Ki-27 Nate x 17
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 15
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 3
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 22
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 17

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 12

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-25C Mitchell: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 9
Ki-27 Nate x 17
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 15
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 3
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 22
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 17

Allied aircraft
B-24D Liberator x 32

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 damaged
Ki-27 Nate: 2 damaged
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 8 damaged

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 128
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:15:42 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
His comment: "abandon your futile efforts to bomb Rangoon, they will only result in the demise of your pilots... (insert evil sith laugh here)"

Many thousands of miles to the east, Baker island airfield is finally level 4, I mass all CentPac and SoPac heavies on Baker and on 29th I launch a massive strike vs Tarawa:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Tarawa , at 85,91

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 18

Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 85
F-5A Lightning x 7
B-17E Fortress x 88
B-24D Liberator x 33

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 26 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 10 destroyed
B5N Kate: 6 destroyed
H8K Emily: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38G Lightning: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
105 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 18
Airbase supply hits 9
Runway hits 101


He lost 80 aircraft today, I lost 6.

His comment in the mail:

"could you telegraph your intentions a little better? The next big push will occur either in the marianas, either in the andaman island, or maybe both at the same time. That much seems pretty darn clear. By the way, I hope you're having fun bombing timor, you actually almost had me convinced you were going to attack there, but then I reconned and I saw no ships in all of northern australia... so if you were going to attack well..."

His comment regarding bombing Timor... yes I have been sending medium sized B25/B26 airstrikes vs Koepang and Lautem, that I mostly didn't even list here in this AAR. Since his airfields there are empty, there were no results to write about.

Since I take care to play fair, and change commands in this game when needed, I have solid medium bomber force assigned to Australia and SW Pac commands. Since I am well into negative PP region (remember) I can't change their command, so I use them to bomb Timor from North Australia. Good thing to see - if he's not trying to fool me - that these strikes priduced at least some psychological results.

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 129
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:19:06 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
My reply to his last mail:

"Well you're partially right.

Tarawa thing is pretty much obvious, and I admit you're correct about it. I also said in my AAR, and will repeat here, that I hate when I am so obvious as that. I also hate when I win battles on attrition and/or brute force (as you see in this combat replay - mindless brute force in action). I am much more happy with what I did with Marcus, Wake and Akyab, ie a strategic surprise and conquest without even having to fight (Sun Tzu stuff LOL), quick and sudden shift of strategic weight before you even can react etc. I tried to surprise you with Eniwetok thing too, but it didn't work (it could have worked but I called it off, so we'll never know).

But sometimes it just can't be done and in case of Tarawa - I agree, it's so obvious I don't have much to say. I'll have to win that round by brute force and attrition.

Having said that, there is still possibility of operational surprise and operational level planning, even if the strategic surprise is lost. So, you know Tarawa is on the list of my objectives, but when and how exactly will I do that? WITP is in it's core an operational level game, and operations are either won or lost, which is the core of the game and will ultimately decide who wins the war. So, fine, you know where my next operation (one of them) will be, but not what exactly I will do.

Also, you're not entirely correct about my other plans (Andamans, Timor etc.) but I will not comment on that, for now :o) I will just say this: you don't expect me to really have 100 AKs in Darwin harbor in preparation for Timor invasion, so that you can bomb them all quite freely with Betties and BBs?? So, Timor invasion, if and when it arrives, will most probably not come from Darwin (unless I again have to do the "brute force, no secrets to hide, my daddy is bigger than yours" kind of thing). I always do my best to come from unexpected direction. Sometimes it works (Marcus, Eniwetok etc.), sometimes not (Tarawa).

I am quite angry at my predecessor and his AR craziness, I'd almost rather have 10 good 7000+ AKs then this "repair factory" I don't need at all."

BTW recon puts 15 units on Tarawa, 65k men, with lots of guns, no tanks.



_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 130
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:21:34 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
My comment regarding ARs was related to this (my previous mail):

"MY GOD, I received no less than 20 repair ships (AR) today!!!!
What would I need so many ARs for? (I already have 7-8 could use perhaps 2-3 more)."

Yes one of the previous Allied commanders converted 20+ ships to ARs and I got them now. I don't know what to do with them.

His comment:

"hehe, I think your predecessor wass simply overreacting to the Lexington in port with 98 system damage. (I believe that's what one of them once told me she had when she reached the East Coast)"

and my reply:

"Could be, when I took over it was at 88 or something. Now it's 38, no ARs, just sitting in the repair yard, alone. So expect to see it on the battlefield soon"





_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 131
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:24:55 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
30th Dec, I continue attacks vs Tarawa:

Day Air attack on Tarawa , at 85,91

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 11

Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 83
F-5A Lightning x 7
B-17E Fortress x 75
B-24D Liberator x 72

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 19 destroyed
H8K Emily: 1 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 19 destroyed
B5N Kate: 10 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38G Lightning: 2 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 7 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
SS I-6, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage

Japanese ground losses:
98 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase hits 14
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 96
Port hits 1
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 4

BTW it's 9 hexes Baker to Tarawa, so B25s, which I have in abundance, can't make it, I may use only 4E heavies. I noted he has some ship in port (damaged sub) so I redirected some bombers to port attack, and sunk his sub.

His comment:

"This is so frustrating... my untrained zero pilots can do NOTHING against P-38s...
experience is around high 40s for the entirety of the IJN fighter AF... "

My reply:

"Well it's your fault, at least partially. It is my opinion you used your Zeros quite wastefully (since I took over, and then i "extrapolated" this to previous situation as well, because if you were so wasteful vs me, then I assumed you were certainly as wasteful before). For example using Zeros and Bettys en masse in air atrikes vs PM. What is the purpose of those strikes, unless you plan to invade PM? No matter how many Kittyhawks and Marauders you manage to destroy in the air and on the ground, I'll always get more, and you lose IJN pilots - for nothing (because you don't plan to invade nothing).

We had one very huge battle over Gili Gili - you, apparently, sent CV Zero squadrons to defend the place, I sent the massive strike, and that day I lost like 130 aircraft (mostly P-40), you lost 80+ Zeros - 90% of them in AA combat (which means pilot is usually dead).

My reasoning may be wrong, but that day is marked as the day you wasted your CV fighter pilots for practically no long term use.

To tell the truth, my P-40 production is not that big, and after some PM battles my 72-aircraft groups were down to 15 aircraft, with replacement pool down to 0. You almost wiped out my complete Australian-based P40 force, at what must be huge cost in Zeros and Betties, but unless you plan to capitalize on that and invade, there's no purpose.

As IJN I never send strikes unless I plan to invade very soon. (Or as maskirovka feint to make my opponent believe I will invade, but I'd take care not to lose 50 Zeros + pilots just to trick him into believing :o)

For quite a some time I explain in my AAR that I believe your Zero force (landbased and on CVs) must be paper tiger, with low EXP pilots, that will be crushed as soon as I manage to scrape together some CV force (and find guts to actually use it :o)

But, even after EXP gets low, Japanese can fight if they use mass of fighters, even if they are low EXP. This is what you do over Rangoon and I do in my other games as IJN. This works OK, but you can't mass fighters all over the map, just couple bases max. Also, it would take many days for your to transfer IJA aircraft to some remote Pacific island (leaving Indochina undefended, risking a lot).

Lets see what will London ask for this time..... I gave them an old cruiser back this month, but refused to give away DDs."



_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 132
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:28:20 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
He explained his reasoning for IJN fighter use:

"well, my view on using the zeros was this: It is better to have them die now, taking 2-3 allied pilots with them, than have them die later, when they may fail to take even 1 allied pilot with them. Of course, it puts my current pilots in a horrible situation, but hey, life is life...

ps: churchill still hates you man. A CLAA this time... but hey, for like 3 months now it said stuff like "previous british penalty paid: 2500, or 2600, and this turn it said 600... I don't know but musn't you be pretty darn low on PPs? Aren't gonna be using a lot of New Zealand and Australian base units are you..."

On 31st, another strike vs Tarawa (airfield is 90% damage I must keep the pressure)

Day Air attack on Tarawa , at 85,91

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 58
F-5A Lightning x 5
B-17E Fortress x 51
B-24D Liberator x 54

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 6 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 18 destroyed
B5N Kate: 9 destroyed
H8K Emily: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 10 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 7 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
37 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 7
Airbase supply hits 8
Runway hits 84

USN minelayer, transferred to India, laid mines couple hexes away from Rangoon, but also hit mine itself. Then Rangoon airforce pounced the damaged minelayer in the morning, but scored no hits. Obviously no Betties on naval attack in the region....

Day Air attack on TF at 27,32

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 17
Ki-27 Nate x 22
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 18
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 4
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 21
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 32
Ki-21 Sally x 6
Ki-48 Lily x 4

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
DM Tracy, on fire

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 133
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:37:10 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
With this, we entered the new year. I was glad that situation over Akyab stabilised, with no new bombardments nor air strikes. My fighter force regained strength, I unloaded new engineers and RN base forces with their 6in CD guns, in relative peace. Fighter umbrella over BBs in Akyab is relatively strong, and I don't think he'll run another bombardment any time soon. I think I can say that, after all, I managed to take control over skies over Akyab, as I planned initially.

Now I have to build the place to level 4 air first, then to level 6 (and level 5 in between 4 and 6 )....

We both focused on Gilberts, and exchanged some funny mails too. Me:

"ARG!!! MAN make it stop, 12 more ARs today!!! Wanna buy some? :o)

I think it is airfield damage that prevented you from having Tarawa CAP. If it was typhoon my strike would have been cancelled too.

I am around 1000 negative PPs. Which does matter, because I want to play this game as Allies by relatively strict PP rules, no funny stuff (at east not until PPs are paid) No using of Canadian units in Solomons, or North Pacific units in Noumea, or SE Asia units outside SE Asia etc."

That's it for now. So, grand total results for December:

- Around 500 Japanese aircraft lost (just my rough estimate, I didn't go thru numbers exactly)
- Around 200-250 Allied aircraft lost (mostly Akyab fighters bombarded from the sea)
- Allies win skies over Akyab after all
- Allies put Tarawa airfield out of action, in prepapration for their Gilbert islands offensive

BTW did you know that current name of the state of Kiribati is just a magled pronunciation of the original English Gilberts (Gilbert islands)?

Oleg



_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 134
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:47:01 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
A look on two most active theatres of war, on 3rd Jan 43.

Akyab reclaimed, level 3, going on level 4




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 135
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/20/2006 7:51:38 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
Gilberts etc. Huge bomber offensive started in closing days of 42 after I built Baker to level 4 (required for level bombers to fly)




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 136
RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg - 3/21/2006 3:31:20 PM   
sprior


Posts: 8596
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Portsmouth, UK
Status: offline
Well done pulling that one back from the brink! I shall follow this with interest but refrain from offering advice as I suck at this game.

_____________________________

"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.



(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 137
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Bloody Shambles: BossGnome vs. Oleg Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.391