Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

House rules for LRB bombing

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> House rules for LRB bombing Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 9:19:38 AM   
Knaust

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 3/5/2001
From: Rivoli ITALY
Status: offline 		Those Allied LRB bombings are very annoying in the early stage of war...I didn't hear of such use by the Allies in the early war...are they historical?
Is there any house rule for these bombings?
I, as Japanese, am very depressed as no Jap fighter can stop them, a single air attack erases the airfiled and takes a high toll of planes
Post #: 1
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 9:25:28 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
quote:

Those Allied LRB bombings are very annoying in the early stage of war...I didn't hear of such use by the Allies in the early war...are they historical?
Is there any house rule for these bombings?
I, as Japanese, am very depressed as no Jap fighter can stop them, a single air attack erases the airfiled and takes a high toll of planes


Use NIK mod 5.0, flak has been increased and LBA capacity decreased.. Yesterday my PBEM opponent send 80 B-17 over rabaul at 25K. Flak killed 5 and damaged 40, scored 10 runway hits, and 3 planes on the ground....

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to Knaust)
Post #: 2
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 9:58:01 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 3
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 10:48:28 AM   
Knaust

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 3/5/2001
From: Rivoli ITALY
Status: offline 		where can I find NIK mods?....can I apply this mod to my current game?

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 4
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:10:51 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
quote:

where can I find NIK mods?....can I apply this mod to my current game?


Go to spooky's site

http://mathubert.free.fr/

and look for (CTRL + F) NIK mod 5.02

This is a SCENARIO, not a mod, so you need to restart your game...

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to Knaust)
Post #: 5
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:45:45 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

quote:

Those Allied LRB bombings are very annoying in the early stage of war...I didn't hear of such use by the Allies in the early war...are they historical?
Is there any house rule for these bombings?
I, as Japanese, am very depressed as no Jap fighter can stop them, a single air attack erases the airfiled and takes a high toll of planes


Use NIK mod 5.0, flak has been increased and LBA capacity decreased.. Yesterday my PBEM opponent send 80 B-17 over rabaul at 25K. Flak killed 5 and damaged 40, scored 10 runway hits, and 3 planes on the ground....


I´m playin Nik´s mod too, but this result seems too high to me.

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 6
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:49:03 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
quote:

´m playin Nik´s mod too, but this result seems too high to me.


Not with 8 FLAK units there

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 7
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:53:43 AM   
Knaust

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 3/5/2001
From: Rivoli ITALY
Status: offline 		so is there a lot of frustrated Jap players?

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 8
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 12:19:41 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

quote:

´m playin Nik´s mod too, but this result seems too high to me.


Not with 8 FLAK units there



okay, that explains it. I have to say I wouldn´t put 8 units in one base though and expect my opponents to do the same.

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 9
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 12:50:36 PM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
quote:

okay, that explains it. I have to say I wouldn´t put 8 units in one base though and expect my opponents to do the same.


Allies serverly lack AA units.....

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 10
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 1:53:51 PM   
dereck


Posts: 2800
Joined: 9/7/2004
From: Romulus, MI
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2
Allies serverly lack AA units.....


Oh? And why praytell?

_____________________________

PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 11
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 2:46:55 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dereck


quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2
Allies serverly lack AA units.....


Oh? And why praytell?


Uh-oh.

(in reply to dereck)
Post #: 12
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 3:03:46 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		So the AA morph is a result of Japanese players not being happy with the real life inability to deal with 4E bombers and the lack of any restrictions on stacking and 4E availability? Why not just ship with FedEx?

I am experiencing no massive 4e swarms or a flak gap (unless like in real life AA weapons have minimum and maximum ceilings) in CHS so simply reducing the availability of aircraft to nearer their historical numbers alleviates the base crushing air attacks the game so short sightedly allows now and removes any need to correct one wrong with another potential wrong, turning flak into Nike-Zeus missile sites.

Oh, and odn't use PDUs, or use it with some sense of control.

< Message edited by Ron Saueracker -- 2/27/2006 3:08:51 PM >

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to String)
Post #: 13
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 4:29:38 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

quote:

´m playin Nik´s mod too, but this result seems too high to me.


Not with 8 FLAK units there


that would do it. Japan has only so many heavy AA however, so the con of building up the flak that strongly in one spot is that other areas will be more vulnerable. Try probing attacks on other bases or stage a night attack.




_____________________________


(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 14
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 10:47:00 PM   
Przemcio231


Posts: 1901
Joined: 10/11/2005
From: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)
Status: offline 		Sorry to dissapoint you mate but non of my B-17's were destroyed only some 30 damaged... well night attack this sounds nice hehe

< Message edited by Przemcio231 -- 2/27/2006 10:48:59 PM >

_____________________________



Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 15
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 10:50:52 PM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline 		Me and my big mouth

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to Przemcio231)
Post #: 16
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 10:52:48 PM   
Przemcio231


Posts: 1901
Joined: 10/11/2005
From: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)
Status: offline 		Better send me the turn...

_____________________________



Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)

(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 17
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:04:01 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Those Allied LRB bombings are very annoying in the early stage of war...I didn't hear of such use by the Allies in the early war...are they historical?
Is there any house rule for these bombings?
I, as Japanese, am very depressed as no Jap fighter can stop them, a single air attack erases the airfiled and takes a high toll of planes


In the game the Japanese are blessed with torpedo bombers which routinely perform far, far better than historical records can support. Part of the reason is that the game allows the Japanese to have torpedo maintenance deports at any level 4 airbase and a supply of aerial torpedos only just barely exceeded by the number of 7.7 mm rounds in their inventory (torpedo attacks were actually pretty rare seemingly only occurring in the vicinity of major bases).
But sadly the other part is an overestimation of the effectiveness of IJN torpedo bombers. The G3s/G4s had a very few good days in 1941-42 sinking PoW/Repulse and DD Jarvis and ________ (in these threads folks have been having an extremely difficult time seemingly to fill in this blank). The number of torpedo hits scored by Kates in 1941-42 (excluding the PH attack) is under a dozen (which many IJN Players routinely score in 1 battle by the KB).

IMHO don't get depressed. Use your overpowered G3s/G4s to GET EVEN for the overpowering numbers of 4E bombers for as long as possible (the numbers are a bit much but the general ineffectiveness of Japan's weapons on them isn't that far off).


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 18
RE: House rules for LRB bombing - 2/27/2006 11:24:59 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		B-17's are very hard to bring down in the mod. So much so that getting even 1 is usually cause for gloating in an AAR. Ask Speedy.

_____________________________


(in reply to Przemcio231)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> House rules for LRB bombing Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.094