Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:34:40 AM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline
A lil destroyer that hasn't grown up yet or a gun boat or steroids? You decide.

As a Japanese noob I'm wondering what use this class of destoyer is. It has short legs, no depth charges and little AA ability (12), how is this ship not a gun boat? More to the point, what good is it?

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
Post #: 1
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:38:14 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Not much good as is, but it does get a little bit of a refit in 3/42. Then it can be used as a convoy escort.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 2
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:38:29 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline
it will get DCs later - you have never enough escort vessels -especially with aggressive allied sub command

_____________________________


(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 3
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:40:12 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
The Minekazes were the oldest destroyers in fleet service by 12/41, having been commisioned from 1920-22.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 4
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:52:53 AM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline
So stick them away in some port until they upgrade? Im considering using them in my DEI campaign to chase down the ships trying to run away.

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 5
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/4/2006 1:59:11 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
You can do that; just remember that they don't have Long Lances...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 6
Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 2:02:42 AM   
Ursa MAior

 

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline
Good point. I have another one.

Why are the infamous Tomozuru class torpedo boats classed as DDs?

_____________________________


Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 7
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 2:05:36 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Good question... They're certainly not big enough...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Ursa MAior)
Post #: 8
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 2:09:58 AM   
Ursa MAior

 

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline
Good speed 30+ 3×4,7" and a coupl of longlances are still only a beefed up, but handicapped (no DCs) PG for me. How is it in CHS?

_____________________________


Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 9
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 2:21:24 AM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

Good speed 30+ 3×4,7" and a coupl of longlances are still only a beefed up, but handicapped (no DCs) PG for me. How is it in CHS?


About the same as the Minekaze then. With my very spotty knowledge of navy history and tactics I had forgotten that one of the main reasons destroyers were designed was to deliver torps in combat situations that were not suitable for motor patrol boats, i.e. naval engagements in far away places.

I believe the reason both of these were classed as DDs was for that very reason. Might be good to use in small surface combat fleets.

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie

(in reply to Ursa MAior)
Post #: 10
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 2:39:53 AM   
Monter_Trismegistos

 

Posts: 1359
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
They are as old and as small as flush-deckers, use them as escorts against PT boats, they are also very handy (and expendable) in Fast Transport mission.

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 11
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 3:21:08 AM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline
Even if they can't DC a sub, they can keep it from surfacing and gunning your ships...

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 12
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 3:27:32 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

Good speed 30+ 3×4,7" and a coupl of longlances are still only a beefed up, but handicapped (no DCs) PG for me. How is it in CHS?


About the same as the Minekaze then. With my very spotty knowledge of navy history and tactics I had forgotten that one of the main reasons destroyers were designed was to deliver torps in combat situations that were not suitable for motor patrol boats, i.e. naval engagements in far away places.

I believe the reason both of these were classed as DDs was for that very reason. Might be good to use in small surface combat fleets.


Plus, the class "Torpedo Boat" doesn't exist in WitP...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 13
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/4/2006 3:33:00 AM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Convoy escort. As Japan there is areal need for escorts later in the war. Just my 2 cents worth.

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 14
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/5/2006 10:44:08 AM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline
You are asking (first) about very old (WWI era design) destroyers and (later) about a second class destroyer designed in the 1930s which had to have armament reduced for stability reasons - after a dreadful storm made it plain. Both classes were eventually made into something very similar to a DE and, in that form, become useful. The other use of the old DDs was to convert them to APDs, and you have some of those in the game.

Historically, "torpedo boats" were big - not "motor torpedo boats" in the WWII sense - and they remained popular in the small seas of Europe - and also in Thailand! where range was not a big problem. Originally "destroyers" were called "torpedoboat destroyers" - meaning they were supposed to "destroy" those pesky "torpedo boats!" Japan pioneered the very big "cruiser destroyer" for ocean use - but the USN also built remarkably similar big destroyers in the pre war period - and these came to dominate our thinking - so we have forgotten that originally the destroyer was an "anti-torpedoboat" ship! Changing the name - for simplicity - also means we have generally forgotten they are properly called "torpedoboat destroyers" (if the original name is the proper one).

Gun boats are entirely different.  They are generally not intended for use on the open sea - and lack the keel depth or range to do so safely - and they only have one or two guns.  There is little room to make them into effective escorts either. Gun boats are supposed to outclass the unarmed (or tiny) vessels they face - they are supposed to hide from 'real' warships - even destroyers.  And for that reason they are always slow - just fast enough to catch a merchant or small craft.  But there are some gigantic gunboats - and some are ocean going as well - with six inch guns no less!  There also are armored gunboats.  The biggest of all are in Thailand - with 8 inch guns - and one of these is in RHS (the other was sunk in 1940 in a brief war with France - well both were sunk but the one we have appears in Japan after the repairs are completed  - almost at the start of our campaign game). 

< Message edited by el cid again -- 6/5/2006 10:47:53 AM >

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 15
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/5/2006 11:03:28 AM   
Oznoyng

 

Posts: 818
Joined: 4/16/2004
From: Mars
Status: offline
I use them for fast transport primarily until early February 1942. I then send them home to Japan where they repair (2 months of fast transport missions takes its toll on them) and refit. By about mid-march they are escorting transports.

_____________________________

"There is no Black or White, only shades of Grey."
"If you aren't a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem."

(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 16
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/5/2006 11:51:56 AM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Monter_Trismegistos

They are as old and as small as flush-deckers, use them as escorts against PT boats, they are also very handy (and expendable) in Fast Transport mission.


IR, they were commonly used as fast transports.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 17
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/5/2006 2:13:52 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
Yup after their refit they are pretty handy ships as convoy escort/ASW TF ships at 147 AA and 4 ASW rating IIRC

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 18
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/5/2006 6:28:50 PM   
niceguy2005


Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline
el cid, first off thank you to you and the others for answering my questions. Your statement in particular generated a question and a thought.

First, if destroyers were intended as anti-torpedo boat weapons then why did some of them carry so many torpedos themselves? For, surely a high rate of fire deck gun would be far more effective against lightly armored fast moving targets. I do seem to recall hearing about how destroyers were used in that capacity, but the placement of so many torpedo tubes on destroyers would suggest that they had another purpose.

As for gun boats, I have noticed that with several exceptions, navies around the world tended to stick guns on just about anything that was big enough and call them a gun boat. I think this was more common among smaller countries, but even the USN teneded to convert yachts, or whatever was handy at the time into a PG. I wouldn't seriously consider the Minekaze just a gun boat, but certainly did appear to be a ship without a function at the start of the war with the US.

_____________________________


Artwork graciously provided by Dixie

(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 19
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/5/2006 6:41:24 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Destroyers were indeed intended as anti-torpedo boat weapons, but they ended up supplanting them in their role. Think of them as skirmishers in the armies of the ancient world, their job to attrit the enemy main force and kill off their opposite numbers on the other side.



_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 20
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/5/2006 6:54:39 PM   
rtrapasso


Posts: 22653
Joined: 9/3/2002
Status: offline
quote:

First, if destroyers were intended as anti-torpedo boat weapons then why did some of them carry so many torpedos themselves


Evolution! There was a niche for torpedo attack craft, and the little torpedo boats could not cut the mustard (too small, fragile, short range, too slow for that matter - most of the DDs in WW1 were faster than the torpedo boats they were designed to destroy, iirc). The bigger, faster and tougher DDs got torpedo tubes to carry the weapon instead. Torpedoes were just too important and devastating a weapon to discard.

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 21
RE: Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide - 6/6/2006 12:09:55 AM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

First, if destroyers were intended as anti-torpedo boat weapons then why did some of them carry so many torpedos themselves? For, surely a high rate of fire deck gun would be far more effective against lightly armored fast moving targets. I do seem to recall hearing about how destroyers were used in that capacity, but the placement of so many torpedo tubes on destroyers would suggest that they had another purpose.

It is quite simple. It was recognized early on that in carrying out their mission of destroying torpedo boats before they could reach torpedo launch positions (somewhere in between opposing battle lines), they would themselves have attained good positions to carry out torpedo attacks of their own. Because of this, "pure" torpedo boats (fast, fragile craft with scarcely any guns) became obsolete, and the two types merged together into the destroyer.

Actually the torpedo boat did not become obsolete; rather it became smaller and faster, cheaper to build, harder to hit. It became the MTB/PT boat.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to niceguy2005)
Post #: 22
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 12:17:51 AM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Yup after their refit they are pretty handy ships as convoy escort/ASW TF ships at 147 AA and 4 ASW rating IIRC

Following their refit they are the best DDs available to serve as CVTF escorts. The other old DDs (Wakatakes, Kamikazes) also have similar upgrades. Even the Momis get depth charges. By 7/42 there are scads of excellent escorts, leaving the Fubukis/Akatsukis/Asashios/Kageros/Yugumos (with their superb torpedo batteries) for SCTF duty.

The only downside to using these old DDs with KB is their short legs. All the IJN DDs have more or less lousy endurance, but using the older DDs really ties you to your train. Not an insurmountable obstacle, but it is a constraint. IMO it is worth it.

< Message edited by irrelevant -- 6/6/2006 12:23:48 AM >


_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 23
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 12:23:30 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
The only upgrade that disappointed me was the Yugumo's first upgrade. They gained no AA, but they do get a couple of radars. Not sure if the air radar works though. Anyone know? All of the rest of the upgrades (at least through Jul 42) are pretty decent, compared to what the Japanese player starts with.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 24
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 12:37:58 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Unfortunately, unless you run the fix for it, Yugumo's Type 13 radar is useless...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 25
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 1:16:33 AM   
irishman


Posts: 256
Joined: 6/13/2004
From: Emerald Isle
Status: offline
Does the fix work with current games or is a restart needed?

_____________________________

The greater the difficulty, the greater the glory - Cicero

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 26
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 3:10:35 PM   
Arkady


Posts: 1262
Joined: 5/31/2002
From: 27th Penal Battalion
Status: offline
it works only for new games

_____________________________


(in reply to irishman)
Post #: 27
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 6:01:28 PM   
irishman


Posts: 256
Joined: 6/13/2004
From: Emerald Isle
Status: offline
Does this mean that for current games, ALL japanese radars present and future are useless?

_____________________________

The greater the difficulty, the greater the glory - Cicero

(in reply to Arkady)
Post #: 28
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 6:40:52 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Well no, just the Type 13. Unfortunately, that's the only air search radar the Japs get, so they're pretty much screwed...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to irishman)
Post #: 29
RE: Tomozuru a torpedoboat why DD? - 6/6/2006 8:44:35 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Thanks, T. You're just full of good news today.

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Minekaze class DD - YOU Decide Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

7.078