Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Player rating question

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> Player rating question Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Player rating question - 6/19/2006 10:27:57 PM   
Nth Power

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline 		Is there any way to tell :

1) how well a player can bunt?

2) how susceptible to injury they are?

I couldn't find it anywhere, but I think it's useful information to have.
Post #: 1
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 2:17:54 AM   
henry296

 

Posts: 418
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		1.  Not sure if that is a hidden rating or not.
2.  There is a hidden durability rating.

(in reply to Nth Power)
Post #: 2
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 2:47:20 PM   
Nth Power

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks for the reply.  I suppose the transaction history could be used as an indicator for being injury prone, so that's not really a problem.

Bunting would be nice to be able to see, as it would help me from making all those bad bunts! :)  It seems I'm only successful about half the time.
Perhaps the Contact rating has something to do with it?

(in reply to henry296)
Post #: 3
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 7:40:35 PM   
Amaroq

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/3/2005
From: San Diego, California
Status: offline 		Nth - I've been using 'contact + speed' as a metric for 'should a guy bunt'. Just remember, even a good bunt-for-a-hit guys is still going to fail 70% of the time, so if you've had 3 successes in 20 attempts (.150) that's not statistically significant...

(in reply to Nth Power)
Post #: 4
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 7:54:40 PM   
Claymore Cut


Posts: 270
Joined: 5/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Amaroq

Nth - I've been using 'contact + speed' as a metric for 'should a guy bunt'. Just remember, even a good bunt-for-a-hit guys is still going to fail 70% of the time, so if you've had 3 successes in 20 attempts (.150) that's not statistically significant...



What about just sacrifice Bunting? I have been noticing quite a few fielder's Choices when trying to have my pitcher move the guy to second. If the rating in contact for Sac Bunting, then Pitchers are going to be pretty bad at Bunting, no?

(in reply to Amaroq)
Post #: 5
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 8:55:14 PM   
Amaroq

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/3/2005
From: San Diego, California
Status: offline

Not sure - I've typically been sac bunting *because* its my pitcher at the plate, I rarely SAC with a hitter at the plate.

(in reply to Claymore Cut)
Post #: 6
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 8:57:22 PM   
Claymore Cut


Posts: 270
Joined: 5/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Amaroq



Not sure - I've typically been sac bunting *because* its my pitcher at the plate, I rarely SAC with a hitter at the plate.


Have you noticed the Sacrifice completion as kind if low (for pitchers)?

(in reply to Amaroq)
Post #: 7
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 10:07:06 PM   
Nth Power

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Claymore Cut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Amaroq

Nth - I've been using 'contact + speed' as a metric for 'should a guy bunt'. Just remember, even a good bunt-for-a-hit guys is still going to fail 70% of the time, so if you've had 3 successes in 20 attempts (.150) that's not statistically significant...



What about just sacrifice Bunting? I have been noticing quite a few fielder's Choices when trying to have my pitcher move the guy to second. If the rating in contact for Sac Bunting, then Pitchers are going to be pretty bad at Bunting, no?

Actually I meant sacrifice bunts, sorry for not clarifying...
I've even seen a couple of bunt double plays which shouldn't happen that often.

Using the contact+speed method sounds good. I'll give it a try and see if I see any improvement. Thanks Amaroq!

(in reply to Claymore Cut)
Post #: 8
RE: Player rating question - 6/20/2006 10:35:56 PM   
Claymore Cut


Posts: 270
Joined: 5/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nth Power


quote:

ORIGINAL: Claymore Cut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Amaroq

Nth - I've been using 'contact + speed' as a metric for 'should a guy bunt'. Just remember, even a good bunt-for-a-hit guys is still going to fail 70% of the time, so if you've had 3 successes in 20 attempts (.150) that's not statistically significant...



What about just sacrifice Bunting? I have been noticing quite a few fielder's Choices when trying to have my pitcher move the guy to second. If the rating in contact for Sac Bunting, then Pitchers are going to be pretty bad at Bunting, no?

Actually I meant sacrifice bunts, sorry for not clarifying...
I've even seen a couple of bunt double plays which shouldn't happen that often.

Using the contact+speed method sounds good. I'll give it a try and see if I see any improvement. Thanks Amaroq!


But if you increase Pitchers contact, won't they become better overall batters (making them even less likely to Sac Bunt in the first place)?

(in reply to Nth Power)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> Player rating question Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.641