RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/27/2006 10:14:45 PM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Aye, AI stupidity says little about RHS EOS itself... One thing I've been very gratified to see is poorly escorted Betty Daitai managing to slip a few planes through CV TF CAP and get hits on Allied CVs. Admittedly this is in mid-42 when Allied CAP isn't that great but in stock games these same strikes would return no kills.

There certainly do seem to be a lot more "leakers" in RHS and from stopping the game every 6 months and reviewing outcomes things look to be progressing along quite historical lines.

Works for both sides too: I have had B-17s out of Pearl on Dec 7 actually score on Japanese carriers - although the attacks are small - if the CAP is not strong it isn't easy for a Zero CAP to get all the B-17s. I even saw a B-18/23 Bolo score a hit once.

(in reply to Nemo121)

Post #: 31

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/27/2006 10:20:24 PM

Nemo121

Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline

Nope, it surely doesn't. In my test-game. Now mid-43 the AI has not expanded a SINGLE engine factory... It is trying to build 75 Me-264s per month requiring 300 engines but is only building the December 7th 41 number of Mansyu engines. Dumb AS A POST!

Still, the air to air combat portion of RHS is holding up well into 1943. The Tojo is a real killer.... My top Sentai has over 300 kills gained in just 9 months flying the Me-109 and Tojo.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 32

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/27/2006 10:32:50 PM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Nope, it surely doesn't. In my test-game. Now mid-43 the AI has not expanded a SINGLE engine factory... It is trying to build 75 Me-264s per month requiring 300 engines but is only building the December 7th 41 number of Mansyu engines. Dumb AS A POST! �� Still, the air to air combat portion of RHS is holding up well into 1943. The Tojo is a real killer.... My top Sentai has over 300 kills gained in just 9 months flying the Me-109 and Tojo.

Only ONE engine factory expands in WITP - the one in the center of Japan - NW of Tokyo - Gumma Prefecture. ONLY the engine type set up for that location expands if AI is boss - and ONLY IF it is needed.

(in reply to Nemo121)

Post #: 33

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/27/2006 11:21:43 PM

Nemo121

Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline

Hmm, I should clarify... they haven't repaired damage either.... No expansion, no ( or at the very least imperceptible) repair of disabled factories.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 34

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/27/2006 11:47:47 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again

I just saw AI take Palembang ...

Nice improvement. What was the approximate date (month/year is good enough).

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 35

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/28/2006 12:15:57 AM

Nemo121

Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline

My AI took it in September/October 42

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 36

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS: Cured - 9/28/2006 6:36:21 AM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

Enterprise and Lexington got sunk in June 1942 - and neither respawned.

I did two things:

moved Essex class to a different slot

moved all six early US CVs to different slots.

one - or both - of these things - works.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 37

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS - 9/28/2006 6:38:19 AM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again

I just saw AI take Palembang ...

Nice improvement. What was the approximate date (month/year is good enough).

May 42 - from the south - by rail. The division then moved on to attack the coal fields on the West coast - but had not yet reached the site (trail movement is slow).

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 38

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS: Cured - 9/28/2006 3:50:58 PM

timtom

Posts: 2358
Joined: 1/29/2003
From: Aarhus, Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again

Enterprise and Lexington got sunk in June 1942 - and neither respawned.

I did two things:

moved Essex class to a different slot

moved all six early US CVs to different slots.

one - or both - of these things - works.

Ran a quick test that seems to confirm these findings. It seems to be enough to leave the class slot empty. Works for the cruisers too.

Great news, as far as I'm concerned.

_____________________________

Where's the Any key?

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 39

RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS: Cured - 9/28/2006 4:11:30 PM

Terminus

Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

Glad to hear the bit about the cruisers; that would cure the "US-Army-Cruiser" bug...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to timtom)

Post #: 40

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: Respawning of Carriers in RHS

Page: << < prev 1 [2]