Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/1/2007 11:14:06 PM   
Zap


Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline 		I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.

(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 31
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 1:11:09 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..




_____________________________



(in reply to Zap)
Post #: 32
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 1:57:45 AM   
Mau Fox


Posts: 113
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Matti Kuokkanen

If there are 10 groups of infantry with average number of 10 per group, only one of them will succeed by even damaging tank! And before said 10 infantry groups get even shot at it, tank has killed, suppressed and routed many other infantry groups. So one infantry company isn't going to take out tank company. Even with sufficient amount of infantry running towards tanks shouting URAA might not be good idea either, not without decent antitank weapons.

On the other hand, manual seems to be older than newest version of game and thus this information may be outdated. If this is case, what is % used right now?


Matti Kuokkanen, you could be very surprised and scared to learn how much damage a half platoon of bare infantry men can do to ANY tank BEFORE getting at close range assults ...

There are so MANY ways to play this game other than levelling the battlefield with dozens and dozens of iron toys. Believe me it is even funnier than that.

Of course no one with a healthy mind would face up a company of tanks with a company of infantry without adequate AT support.
But this is written in EVERY battle manuals. Even the real ones.

Mau Fox.

(in reply to Kuokkanen)
Post #: 33
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 3:19:12 AM   
tracer


Posts: 1865
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: New Smyrna Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

Hey...should I be considering myself part of the "Old Crowd"?

I know from previous conversations here a while back that I am considered part of the "Old Guard" which should not to be confused with the "Very Old Guard" but, in turn, is not be confused with the "Young Guard", who I guess don't have the same perks and priviledges as either of the "Older Guards"...ie their own private keys to the executive bathrooms.


...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard

_____________________________

Jim NSB

(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 34
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 3:35:33 AM   
FlashfyreSP


Posts: 1193
Joined: 7/6/2002
From: Combat Information Center
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

Hey...should I be considering myself part of the "Old Crowd"?

I know from previous conversations here a while back that I am considered part of the "Old Guard" which should not to be confused with the "Very Old Guard" but, in turn, is not be confused with the "Young Guard", who I guess don't have the same perks and priviledges as either of the "Older Guards"...ie their own private keys to the executive bathrooms.


...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard


Left Guard is a better position; fewer running plays to that side of the line.


_____________________________


(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 35
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 3:51:14 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.



It's really is very nice...except if you go in there behind Tracer after one of his lunch time visits to Taco-Bell!

_____________________________


(in reply to Zap)
Post #: 36
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 3:54:07 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard


I use Arrid...

An Orzel can, however, be considered Avant-Garde.

(notice cheap rip off of Goblin tag line method)


_____________________________


(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 37
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:27:40 AM   
tracer


Posts: 1865
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: New Smyrna Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).

_____________________________

Jim NSB

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 38
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:32:09 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline 		So that would make you guys part of the "Very Old Fart Guard"?

_____________________________


(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 39
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:35:58 AM   
tracer


Posts: 1865
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: New Smyrna Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.



It's really is very nice...except if you go in there behind Tracer after one of his lunch time visits to Taco-Bell!


So no one bought my "it was the dog" alibi?





_____________________________

Jim NSB

(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 40
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:51:32 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
So no one bought my "it was the dog" alibi?


Umm...there has to be a dog in the bathroom before you can blame it on one Tracer.

_____________________________


(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 41
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:54:10 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).

Well I came along in 4/2000 so....
I was an early one..


_____________________________



(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 42
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:55:06 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

So that would make you guys part of the "Very Old Fart Guard"?

THIS never gets old...





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Alby -- 1/2/2007 5:05:49 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 43
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 5:04:15 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline

You're right...it's timeless!

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 44
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 5:08:53 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline


_____________________________



(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 45
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:12:20 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline

_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 46
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:56:32 AM   
Bernie


Posts: 1779
Joined: 3/15/2002
From: Depot HQ - Virginia
Status: offline

_____________________________

What, me worry?

(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 47
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 7:22:51 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline

_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to Bernie)
Post #: 48
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:02:31 PM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).


This forum wasn't on the map until Bernie, me, Flash, and Ken got here. Loser.



Goblin - A Goblin says the '02 crew RuL3s


_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 49
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 4:39:09 PM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"


_____________________________



(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 50
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 5:03:27 PM   
robot


Posts: 1438
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Covington Ky USA
Status: offline 		Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.

_____________________________

Robots wear armor for skin.Grunts wear skin for armor.

(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 51
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 5:12:11 PM   
FlashfyreSP


Posts: 1193
Joined: 7/6/2002
From: Combat Information Center
Status: offline 		Actually, I joined up back in 2000 as well, but under a different name. In 2001 I had a "disagreement" with the management here, and I "retired". A year later, I came back under this nom-de-guerre. 

_____________________________


(in reply to robot)
Post #: 52
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:08:05 PM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: robot

Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.



The statement was offensive because there is a basis for offense, robot. I did not just log on and decide to be offended by the first post I read; I think you know that.

There is a very in-depth history behind some of our feelings, which most people are unaware of, and which is part of the reason I spoke up. It is not 'trivial' by any means. I do not want newer players thinking things that are inaccurate and based on false statement, and will speak up when I see it happen.

I do apologize if I appeared rude. I was attempting to be straightforward. My apologies to you, robot, but I will speak up when I feel I should.


Goblin



< Message edited by Goblin -- 1/2/2007 6:20:42 PM >

_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to robot)
Post #: 53
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:08:39 PM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FlashfyreSP

Actually, I joined up back in 2000 as well, but under a different name. In 2001 I had a "disagreement" with the management here, and I "retired". A year later, I came back under this nom-de-guerre. 


Loser.


_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to FlashfyreSP)
Post #: 54
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:09:49 PM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"






_____________________________

http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/index.php

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 55
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:46:08 PM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"





Ohhhhhhh...refs, can that be considered a shot below the belt?

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 56
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:48:53 PM   
Riun T

 

Posts: 1848
Joined: 7/31/2004
Status: offline 		Kick em in the junk!!

(in reply to Orzel Bialy)
Post #: 57
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/2/2007 6:56:17 PM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bernie




hmmm, perhaps this is true but then again....when is the last time you saw a thread with THIS much activity in it???


_____________________________


(in reply to Bernie)
Post #: 58
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/3/2007 5:21:24 AM   
Bernie


Posts: 1779
Joined: 3/15/2002
From: Depot HQ - Virginia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: robot

Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.


I'm sorry you feel that way Robot. My purpose here was to reply to a statement made by Gunny, regarding his opinion of why many of the members here no longer visit or post here. If you were party to past such episodes with Gunny perhaps you would understand why it was important to do so.

It's not a case of "taking offense". Glenn's statement, unchallenged, might have had newcomers here believing it to be fact, rather than opinion. As someone who is a member of, as he termed it, "the 'old' SPWaW crowd", I felt a rebuttal was in order. Who better to rebut such a statement then representatives of the very group he speaks of?

_____________________________

What, me worry?

(in reply to robot)
Post #: 59
RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry - 1/3/2007 5:49:30 AM   
Orzel Bialy


Posts: 2664
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Wisconsin USA
Status: offline 		Well I guess this thread turned out to be yet another example that should teach one and all to be aware of the watchword "Responsibility" while posting.

While fishing you can open a can of worms and at worst end up cleaning up a tangled mess of the slippery critters...on a forum you open up a can of worms and they may just eat you alive.

_____________________________


(in reply to Bernie)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.332