BCtheQB
Posts: 174
Joined: 3/17/2005 From: BCtheQB Status: offline
|
weighted shifting 1 pt for te 1 pt for fb or other te a 2 pt shift either way causes a reaction ( I will create a proof/ diarama if anyone is interested) games Ive played at least a decade ago "Necessary Roughness" notated a strong side in the offensive formation which remained a reference for the defense when desired as a key to shift versus I real life my players had specific backfield keys (which are very easy to program) as opposed to blindly stuffing gaps, so my players were never screwed by doing what i told them, and were far less trap susceptible vs power offenses they bunched up we bunched up (impossible to expect if you tell your kids to man gaps vs scattershot offenses, fly, option, veer, toss, if they spread out , we spread out. as a result I never had to ask "who's got that guy?" but keying on formations, and more germaine here... programming to formations is too easily manipulated
_____________________________
Skagit Valley Lightning, HC, OC, DC, QB,Seattle Stallions 8-3,QB,West Sound Saints, NAFL CHamps, King County Jaguars 05 NAFL W.Conf Champz,#2inUS Eastside Hawks 03 #2 in US , 04 #1,#1 in PIFL.
|