Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Battlefront or Battles In Italy??

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Battlefront >> Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/11/2007 3:57:10 PM   
mashkis

 

Posts: 141
Joined: 1/29/2005
Status: offline 		Hi All,

I have been thinking about getting either Battlefront or BII and I am not sure which game is best overall? Battlefront has had mixed reviews and BII has lots of different senerios.

For those that have played both, what would you recommend if you could only get afford to get one of the games?
thanks.
Post #: 1
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/11/2007 5:17:45 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Battlefront is on a bit different scale than Battles in Italy, but if you think you'd like BII you'd also like Battlefront. Battlefront is also the future of the SSG land combat series, so you're likely to see more happening here than with BII in the future. Really you can't go wrong with either choice though and BII could be seen as a good way to step up to Battlefront - it does have quite a few bonus scenarios at Run5 too.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to mashkis)
Post #: 2
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/11/2007 10:21:16 PM   
Howard7x


Posts: 213
Joined: 8/19/2006
From: Derby, England
Status: offline 		Yeah in terms of right now at this moment, id go with BII. Although i love BF there are only currently a handfull of scenarios that may leave you wanting more. BII has been out for a couple of years and has enough scenarios to keep anyone busy for a good year or two.

BF will be the clear winner once there are some more scenarios available. So if you can, buy both

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 3
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/12/2007 1:21:32 AM   
Whytfyjrd

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 7/25/2005
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		I am facing the same dilemma as mashkis: I have Battles in Normandy and Korsun Pocket and liked them a fair bit --- tho' the gameplay seems pretty same-same by the time of BiN. I'm intrigued by Battlefront, and during its developmnent I was very attentive, as I am very interested in gaming at this more Operational scale. But I too have reservations based on issues raised in the Forum.

I'd be very grateful hear some more opinions or comments on BiI vs BF.

(in reply to Howard7x)
Post #: 4
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/13/2007 4:36:04 PM   
Gen Alexandra

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 3/2/2007
Status: offline 		If I can offer some advice:

I myself have played BiN, BiI and now BF. Whilst BiN is a great game, BiL has become my favorite game of the series release. It has an addictive twist to it, requiring a good knowledge of the game mecahnics to make it fullfilling in terms of a stratergy game. It has also a wealth of support through well established Customer Senarios, to keep the interest high as a purchase.

On the day of release, I purchased BF, downloaded the game, installed it, opened it and did a quick U turn!, this was something very different than BiI. Opening quickly the Manual which comes with the download, it was clear to see that this game was a more (I will use a saying from somone on the CoW Forum) "A Beer and Pretzels" game. You need to read the manual, read the AAR or reviews from gamers to understand what is in front of you. There is much to learn, new ways of supply, new direct action, defensive fire, front lines, recon units etc.

Once I understood the basics of game play and principals, BF became my most favorite of all SSG release's, although I still love playing BiI, BF gives me much more, much more scope to create a plan that works, or fails!.

IMHO, purchase BF, read the manual, play a bit against the AI, then start a PBEM game, this game will give you immense satisfaction once you understand it's mechanics.

Already there is 2 customer senarios 1. A tutorial by JSS 2. Operation Crusader by Brubaker, both brilliant ! and already enhancing the game. Many more customer senarios are in works also.

The downside (Sorry SSG) is the AI is not much of a challenge.

GEN







(in reply to Whytfyjrd)
Post #: 5
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/14/2007 3:30:23 AM   
BlackSunshine


Posts: 366
Joined: 11/22/2002
Status: offline 		One thing to keep in mind is that there are many, many more scenarios for BII. Plus the AI in BII is very, very hard.

(in reply to Gen Alexandra)
Post #: 6
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/14/2007 2:37:35 PM   
Gen Alexandra

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 3/2/2007
Status: offline 		Agreed.

2 small senarios and two long ones with your purchase is not ideal, but the scope for add ons is enourmous.....

(in reply to BlackSunshine)
Post #: 7
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/14/2007 5:32:37 PM   
Noakesy

 

Posts: 193
Joined: 5/26/2005
Status: offline 		I think personally I prefer BiI and the scenarios that come with it (or even KP and BiN). BF is good, but it's taking some getting used to.

(in reply to Gen Alexandra)
Post #: 8
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/14/2007 7:51:31 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Whytfyjrd

I am facing the same dilemma as mashkis: I have Battles in Normandy and Korsun Pocket and liked them a fair bit --- tho' the gameplay seems pretty same-same by the time of BiN. I'm intrigued by Battlefront, and during its developmnent I was very attentive, as I am very interested in gaming at this more Operational scale. But I too have reservations based on issues raised in the Forum.

I'd be very grateful hear some more opinions or comments on BiI vs BF.


If you liked Korsun pocket I highly recommend the expansion scenario Across the Dnepr. It covers almost the exact map area and time period as the classic board game Panzergruppe Guderian.

There are also a number of free scenarios for BII available on the SSG website, one of which, Typhoon, is a natural extension of the Across the Dnepr scenario.

(in reply to Whytfyjrd)
Post #: 9
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/15/2007 1:00:56 AM   
Whytfyjrd

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 7/25/2005
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		@ HansBolter: Thanks for the info. I actually have Dnepr, but I hadn't opened the box. I'll finally give it a go, based on the PGG comparison.

To the others: thanks for your thoughts too. In particular, Gen_Alexandra, your citing of the specfic aspects of what is different about BF were exactly what I'm looking for.
 
The Decisive Battles series (BiN, BiI, KP,AtD) is a fine game system. When I said the gameplay seemed "same-same," I meant that after playing BiN and KP the prospect of buying BiI made me think, "Do I want more pushing around of regiments, tracking Divisional integrity, figuring AT vs Armor bonuses, allocating Air/Aryty assets, assessing supply, and such?" And my first reaction was, "well, I know lots about the history of these battles, and there's a certain lack of 'novelty' in the situations due to knowledge of OOBs, etc."  Some people really like "historical verity", but I'd rather play with less foreknowledge of enemiy's OOB and intentions.
 
Thus my interest in BF: partly because the scale gives a player much greater scope for decision making with a wider variation of unit types and capabilities, and I presumed that there'd be lots of scenarios where players' (if they play scenarios "cold") tactical/operational choices are not so clear-cut. However, the similar "graphic look" of the two game systems gave me much pause at first: was the "template" of the DB series merely scaled down to the Battalion level, with some minor tweaks for the different asset capabilities?
 
I'll start reading and looking for those BF AARs and look for scenario releases.
 

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 10
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/15/2007 1:35:08 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Whytfyjrd
and I presumed that there'd be lots of scenarios where players' (if they play scenarios "cold") tactical/operational choices are not so clear-cut.  



This is the case. Read my mini review in a nearby thread.


_____________________________


(in reply to Whytfyjrd)
Post #: 11
RE: Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? - 6/24/2007 11:58:46 AM   
lefeld

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline 		I played A LOT of BiN and loved it...then played BiI and loved it a bit less (just personal reasons, I know Normandy very well..etc). Very excited about BF although destabilized at the begining by the new rules and all...I trust Matrix and the community of players will improve the game thru patches and new scenarios.
To answer your questions Battle in Italy is indeed a great game but has less future than BF. If you havent played either I would definitly get used to BF now because its life "expectancy" will be much longer. There are few battles now but give it a few weeks and they will start popping up like mushrooms (wishful thinking), I'm already reading salivating posts about Spanish Civil War battles for instance, the possibilities are endless.

(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Battlefront >> Battlefront or Battles In Italy?? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.828