Slitherine

quote:

ORIGINAL: donnie_1974_texas

Curious why this isn't done? Certainly there is a programming reason I am missing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: donnie_1974_texas

Perhaps there is a reason this is not done, but, why could we not increase the PBEM turnaround speed by effectively allowing each player to do an execution. IE. Something as follows:

1. Japanese player e-mails combat replay & turn orders to Allied player.
2. Allied player watches combat replay.
3. Allied player enters turn orders.
4. Allied player executes.
5. Allied player enters turn orders.
6. Allied player e-mails combat replay & turn orders to Japanese player.
7. Japanese player watches combat replay.
8. Japanese player enters turn orders.
9. Japanese player executes turn.
10. Japanese player enters turn orders.
11. Japanese player e-mails ...repeat...

Thus you get one turn execution per e-mail (or a player sees two turns of activity per sit down session for him) as opposed to two e-mails per turn execution right now.

This would also help with things like air balance numbers and the free recon and react the Allied player has to a/c/base symbols etc.

Curious why this isn't done? Certainly there is a programming reason I am missing.

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE