Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Par for the Course

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Guns of August 1914 - 1918 >> RE: Par for the Course Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 9:06:56 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LarryP

quote:

ORIGINAL: AU Tiger

"PITA" interface? So what if it is? WitP has the worst interface for a game I have seen since "Stellar Empires" on my old TRS-80, but is the best game I have played to date. If you want Bells and Whistles, go play Myst, SIMS: Frat Party, or whatever other RPG the rest of the world is playing now. If you want a solid wargame, stick with Matrix IMHO.

Relinquishing my soapbox now.....


I have Company Of Heroes and that has all the bells and whistles. However, like you said and I agree totally, WitP is much more fun than COH. I go back to WitP, WPO, and UV when I want to feel like I used my brain and not just my eyes.

I don't own this GoA game yet, but after a while I might. I'm reading the posts.



"Bells and whistles" != interface.

And imagine how good WitP could be without the horrendous interface? WitP does not need anymore bells and whistles - but it could be a much, much better gaming experience with a re-designed interface. One that, for example, did not require the Japanese player to spend 8 hours on his first move doing exciting things like loading transports. Oops! I just overloaded that one! Time to reload from a save and start over!

(in reply to LarryP)
Post #: 61
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 9:08:36 PM   
*Lava*


Posts: 1924
Joined: 2/9/2004
Status: offline 		Well sir..

I'm not the one who started a thread with sweeping generalizations in what I can only call an attempt to butcher the game.

Nice try though.

Ray (alias Lava)

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 62
RE: The interface - 7/25/2007 9:08:44 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrankHunter

Thanks for the criticism guys, I am going to give it a good go about doing something about the screen resolution issue at least.





Excellent!

This, IMO, is more important than the interface anyway - if the game is great (and it appears to be) the interface will be irrelevant once you play a few times. That small screen won't ever go away though...

(in reply to FrankHunter)
Post #: 63
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 9:09:39 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lava

Well sir..

I'm not the one who started a thread with sweeping generalizations in what I can only call an attempt to butcher the game.

Nice try though.

Ray (alias Lava)


Is this what passes for discussion around here?

(in reply to *Lava*)
Post #: 64
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 9:14:07 PM   
sol_invictus


Posts: 1961
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Kentucky
Status: offline 		OK, you guys have made your points. Nothing more to be said really. Lets not get in a pissing contest.

_____________________________

"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 65
RE: The interface - 7/25/2007 10:07:27 PM   
LarryP


Posts: 3783
Joined: 5/15/2005
From: Carson City, NV
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHellPatrol

HEY!!! Who you callin' a newbie CHUMP? You can call me names but leave LarryP alone


Thanks HellPatrol! However, my joined date and the true date are different. I was on these forums in around 2001 with a different name and when I changed profiles, they would not merge. So I knew I was not really a newbie but since he was from New Zealand, I figured I best not clutter his mind with hard details.

(in reply to TheHellPatrol)
Post #: 66
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 10:12:12 PM   
LarryP


Posts: 3783
Joined: 5/15/2005
From: Carson City, NV
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut

"Bells and whistles" != interface.

And imagine how good WitP could be without the horrendous interface? WitP does not need anymore bells and whistles - but it could be a much, much better gaming experience with a re-designed interface. One that, for example, did not require the Japanese player to spend 8 hours on his first move doing exciting things like loading transports. Oops! I just overloaded that one! Time to reload from a save and start over!


I for one would sure appreciate a better interface for WitP. We better be careful here, someone might get their little feelings hurt.

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 67
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 10:31:32 PM   
Hanal

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 11/1/2003
Status: offline 		All I will say regarding the interface is that once you play a turn or two, everything falls into place and it is no problem.  Sure, I admit to left clicking when I should have right clicked a few times at the outset but that didn't last long. This is not a game breaker  people and anyone who passes on this game because they are under the impression that the interface is difficult to deal with will be missing out....

(in reply to LarryP)
Post #: 68
RE: Par for the Course - 7/25/2007 11:30:02 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		Well I've just got it and whilst I admit the interface is a little quirky, I'd say it's just fine once you're used to it. I've been playing about an hour and whilst I'm no master at the game, the interface is taking no time at all from the actual game.

Second nature now.

I think somone mentioned another zoom out level would be good and I agree.


_____________________________

Alba gu' brath

(in reply to Hanal)
Post #: 69
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 3:26:06 AM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrankHunter

Thanks for the criticism guys, I am going to give it a good go about doing something about the screen resolution issue at least.




Excellent Sir........When you do you just made another sale

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to FrankHunter)
Post #: 70
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 3:32:28 AM   
Bossy573


Posts: 363
Joined: 3/25/2005
From: Buffalo, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrankHunter

Thanks for the criticism guys, I am going to give it a good go about doing something about the screen resolution issue at least.






IMHO, the windowed aspect doesn't concern me. But when I try to play the game on my desktop monitor, the map doesn't scale to the game window so I'm left with a bunch of blank screen where game map should be.
I hope this made sense. You friendly, company IT guy I'm not.

_____________________________


(in reply to FrankHunter)
Post #: 71
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 4:42:22 AM   
marklv

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline 		This game is a piece of crap.  Incredibly bad interface.  Just a small window in the screen, much too small, no scrolling.  WTF is this guy thinking??

The game itself is also crap.  What the hell does one have to do to attack?  All these phases are boring and waste time - I want to play the goddamn game, not tinker with it!  Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game.

GET THOSE PATCHES IN! THE GAME IS UNPLAYABLE NOW!

< Message edited by marklv -- 7/26/2007 4:43:34 AM >

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 72
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 5:02:38 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		lots of people posting how much they enjoy it, how the UI is fine, how the game is really cool, but no...this guy knows it all.....and all those other folks are jsut plain wrong I guess!!

I reckon ADHD....not enough ritalin...

At least we won't have to see him back here tho

< Message edited by SMK-at-work -- 7/26/2007 5:04:00 AM >

(in reply to marklv)
Post #: 73
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 5:10:54 AM   
sol_invictus


Posts: 1961
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Kentucky
Status: offline 		YIKES! Take a stiff drink.

_____________________________

"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 74
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 5:14:55 AM   
typhoon

 

Posts: 387
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline 		If you don't like the phases then I fear you will never like this game no matter how many patches. For me they are the clever bit and a very refreshing idea. As for Commander yes it's a very good game one I'm also enjoying but hardly anything new Panzer General refreshed  refined and made strategic and the PBEM in that leaves much to the imagination this PBEM's the same as it does against the A.I. The more of this I play the more confident I am that the feel is right that might not mean much to many but I play alot of Panzer Campaigns and I believe the success of that system is all down to the feel of the game each battle feels right for what it tries to portray. With Guns of August you have a game that feels like World War One and plays like World War One perhaps it was just not something you really wanted.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 75
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 5:24:23 AM   
Bossy573


Posts: 363
Joined: 3/25/2005
From: Buffalo, NY
Status: offline 		The game lacks polish in some areas (the game would be awesome full screen at 1600x1200 and I would love to be able to zoom in and out of the main map, etc.) but the mechanics are rock solid. It "feels" like a WWI game should, IMHO of course.

_____________________________


(in reply to typhoon)
Post #: 76
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 5:35:20 AM   
Tophat1815

 

Posts: 1824
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marklv

This game is a piece of crap. Incredibly bad interface. Just a small window in the screen, much too small, no scrolling. WTF is this guy thinking??

The game itself is also crap. What the hell does one have to do to attack? All these phases are boring and waste time - I want to play the goddamn game, not tinker with it! Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game.

GET THOSE PATCHES IN! THE GAME IS UNPLAYABLE NOW!



Who pissed in your Wheaties? It's a WWI strategic wargame that requires more than a wee-tad bit of contemplation. If you think this is too slow for you better stay clear of Witp or you'll be reduced to tears.

(in reply to marklv)
Post #: 77
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 6:34:11 AM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marklv

This game is a piece of crap. Incredibly bad interface. Just a small window in the screen, much too small, no scrolling. WTF is this guy thinking??

The game itself is also crap. What the hell does one have to do to attack? All these phases are boring and waste time - I want to play the goddamn game, not tinker with it! Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game.

GET THOSE PATCHES IN! THE GAME IS UNPLAYABLE NOW!


See now, THIS is someone butchering the game!

And someone who does not understand the seperation between the gameplay and the interface - on the other hand, that is a common trait amongst software users, and why it is worth the trouble to get the interface right.

Excuse me while I go play for a while. I finally have time to dedicate an hour or so to playing...

(in reply to marklv)
Post #: 78
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 6:35:10 AM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bossy573

The game lacks polish in some areas (the game would be awesome full screen at 1600x1200 and I would love to be able to zoom in and out of the main map, etc.) but the mechanics are rock solid. It "feels" like a WWI game should, IMHO of course.


Just imagine this thing at 1600x1200, seeing ALL of any given front on the screen at the same time...drool.

(in reply to Bossy573)
Post #: 79
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 8:33:18 AM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

This game is a piece of crap. Incredibly bad interface. Just a small window in the screen, much too small, no scrolling. WTF is this guy thinking??

The game itself is also crap. What the hell does one have to do to attack? All these phases are boring and waste time - I want to play the goddamn game, not tinker with it! Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game.

GET THOSE PATCHES IN! THE GAME IS UNPLAYABLE NOW!


Someone call the troll patrol!

How can you tell if this game is unplayable and crap? It was released ONE day ago!

Someone should stick to playing checkers.

OK...serious point time. Putting this interface thing into context...I don´t own the game BUT

Almost all these ¨war¨, ¨strategy games¨....whatever you want to call them are really VERY complex. One that comes to mind is TOAW, a true classic game trashed for it`s interface.

I love the game and have played it for years. Was the interface ¨intuitive¨ to where I could pick up the game and be playing in 10 minutes?

Are you kidding...No Way. The games too deep and complex. For that game, and I`m thinking this game too it`s like this. Once you figure it out though and get used to using it's interface you find a great game.

For a game like TOAW and I suspect this game too I don´t see how it's possible to build a ¨intuitive interface¨

The screen resolution thing...yeah, there should be options, all the way from 800x640 and up.

BTW Frank...loved your American Civil War game. I`ll get this one too eventually.

< Message edited by Ike99 -- 7/26/2007 8:37:02 AM >

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 80
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 10:58:47 AM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marklv

This game is a piece of crap. Incredibly bad interface. Just a small window in the screen, much too small, no scrolling. WTF is this guy thinking??

The game itself is also crap. What the hell does one have to do to attack? All these phases are boring and waste time - I want to play the goddamn game, not tinker with it! Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game.

GET THOSE PATCHES IN! THE GAME IS UNPLAYABLE NOW!

BoIIocks...does this
quote:

Commander Europe at War is a much better designed game
mean he's going to be hanging around the Commander Europe at War forum? If so, it almost makes me wish I hadn't bought it.

Seriously, though, people have different opinions and most people are fine with it. But I think some people have communication skill problems.

I mean, seriously, if this guy is working, has no-one smacked him? And if he isn't has his mummy or daddy not smacked him?

_____________________________

Alba gu' brath

(in reply to marklv)
Post #: 81
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 11:11:21 AM   
Adam Parker


Posts: 1848
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: Melbourne Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrankHunter

On the subject of my interfaces, I would agree they aren't that cute.  Its what I'm used to so that's how I tend to do it.  I'm also not interested in programming interfaces...  I can see how that would be frustrating though if a player's interests don't coincide with my own.


Well Frank let me applaud you for the most honest statement I've ever read from a designer.

IMO though, that's where the developer (in this case Matrix) I feel should step in.

However, I can also see the sense in Matrix stepping back from these issues and releasing games as designers intend them, if this is Matrix's intent.

I don't agree with it but it does cement a definite market positioning for Matrix - ie: a company offering "games of all types for all people". IOW a total opposite to the Avalon Hill philosophy of the "AH Way". I'm just a fan of the latter.

(in reply to FrankHunter)
Post #: 82
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 12:20:51 PM   
David Heath


Posts: 3274
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Staten Island NY
Status: offline 		Hi Adam

Matrix has always had the policy of being a publisher and not the final say in what gets done.  We are here to aid our developers and not force them into choices they don't want.  We do give our advice and let our developers know what we will and will not allow but we do that up front.  We have all heard to many horror stories of publishers telling developers how its going to be and destroying what could have been a great game.

David



_____________________________


(in reply to Adam Parker)
Post #: 83
RE: The interface - 7/26/2007 2:08:39 PM   
Adam Parker


Posts: 1848
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: Melbourne Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Heath

Matrix has always had the policy of being a publisher and not the final say in what gets done....


I really didn't know that David. And you do provide for uniformity in the front screens and installers at least and Marc's art touch is always apparent on the "outside".

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Heath

We have all heard to many horror stories of publishers telling developers how its going to be and destroying what could have been a great game.


I'm thinking of one company at least, now gone.



(in reply to David Heath)
Post #: 84
RE: Par for the Course - 7/26/2007 2:32:37 PM   
Noakesy

 

Posts: 193
Joined: 5/26/2005
Status: offline 		I think the subject matter and scale looks good, but all I see about this game is complaints about the interface. Are there screen shots or something that show the interface so I can make my own call as to whether it's something I would tolerate or not?

Thanks

< Message edited by Noakesy -- 7/26/2007 2:33:10 PM >

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 85
RE: Par for the Course - 7/26/2007 2:46:01 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Noakesy,

Take a look at the pinned tutorial thread and the gameplay impressions thread.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Noakesy)
Post #: 86
RE: Par for the Course - 7/26/2007 3:13:56 PM   
Noakesy

 

Posts: 193
Joined: 5/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
Noakesy,
Take a look at the pinned tutorial thread and the gameplay impressions thread.
Regards,
- Erik


Ok, got it thanks - I can see what people mean, but might still give it a thrash. Any screen shots that show me what the resolution problems are?

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 87
RE: Par for the Course - 7/26/2007 6:45:00 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Noakesy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
Noakesy,
Take a look at the pinned tutorial thread and the gameplay impressions thread.
Regards,
- Erik


Ok, got it thanks - I can see what people mean, but might still give it a thrash. Any screen shots that show me what the resolution problems are?


Well, the extent of the "problem" is going to be based on what your native resolution runs at. If you are running 1024x768, there is no problem at all.

Less than that, and the window will take up less screen, and the window is not resizeable, unfortunately.

And don't let the complaints about the interface dissuade you too much. I still think it is pretty poor, but the thing with interface problems is that

A) You get used to it pretty quickly, and
B) The extent that a poor interface is a problem is a function of the complexity of the interface. A complex, poorly implemented interfact is a nightmare. This is a relatively simply interface though.

The impression I have gotten so far is that the complexity of this game is relatively low, in that the number of differnt types of interaction you do is limited in any given screen. Compared to something like WitP or even TOAW, where you can do LOTS of things, and the poor interface in WitP really makes it a struggle. In GoA, there are a lot of differnt commands, but they are divided into phases, so in any given phase, the set of things you can do is relatively limited. That means that the interface, while clunky, doesn't get in the way as much you might expect.

(in reply to Noakesy)
Post #: 88
RE: The interface - 7/27/2007 2:25:05 AM   
Bossy573


Posts: 363
Joined: 3/25/2005
From: Buffalo, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut

Just imagine this thing at 1600x1200, seeing ALL of any given front on the screen at the same time...drool.


The game is just that close to being an all time classic. Gameplay is king, but having the ability to enhance the experience in that way would make it all that much better.

_____________________________


(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 89
RE: The interface - 7/27/2007 2:32:30 AM   
TheHellPatrol


Posts: 1588
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Just my 2 cents, the interface does not detract at all from the gameplay or playability. It is very easy to get used to and once this puppy gets polished up it will be a real keeper. A very clever design...i look forward to delving deeper.

_____________________________

A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.
Henry David Thoreau

(in reply to Bossy573)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Guns of August 1914 - 1918 >> RE: Par for the Course Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.578