RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk!

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk!

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/16/2007 3:16:57 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

USS Wisconsin

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 31

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/16/2007 3:17:13 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

superior gunnery, fire control, damage control

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 32

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/16/2007 3:21:44 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

plus shes faster

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 33

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/16/2007 3:29:26 PM

Fishbed

Posts: 1822
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: Beijing, China - Paris, France
Status: offline

I think Tek was teasing...

by the way, congrats to the navy boys - looks like Tek will have to kick some asses at Truk to know why Kido Butai crews are flying while being drunk... the hit ratio of those last attacks is lightyears away from what the Hiryu's boys achieved at Midway against the Yorktown...

< Message edited by Fishbed -- 9/16/2007 3:30:51 PM >

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 34

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/16/2007 3:35:53 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishbed

I think Tek was teasing...

by the way, congrats to the navy boys - looks like Tek will have to kick some asses at Truk to know why Kido Butai crews are flying while being drunk... the hit ratio of those last attacks is lightyears away from what the Hiryu's boys achieved at Midway against the Yorktown...

quote:

by the way, congrats to the navy boys - looks like Tek will have to kick some asses at Truk to know why Kido Butai crews are flying while being drunk... the hit ratio of those last attacks is lightyears away from what the Hiryu's boys achieved at Midway against the Yorktown.

lol hes usually teazing in 1 form or another. makes him fun to play

agreed, no more Sake for IJN pilots

_____________________________

(in reply to Fishbed)

Post #: 35

RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk! - 9/17/2007 6:24:19 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishbed

I think Tek was teasing...

by the way, congrats to the navy boys - looks like Tek will have to kick some asses at Truk to know why Kido Butai crews are flying while being drunk... the hit ratio of those last attacks is lightyears away from what the Hiryu's boys achieved at Midway against the Yorktown...

quote:

by the way, congrats to the navy boys - looks like Tek will have to kick some asses at Truk to know why Kido Butai crews are flying while being drunk... the hit ratio of those last attacks is lightyears away from what the Hiryu's boys achieved at Midway against the Yorktown.

lol hes usually teazing in 1 form or another. makes him fun to play

agreed, no more Sake for IJN pilots

or their commanders....

you should have seen what i did in my game last night, unbelievable, im never playing witp drunk again, could have easily ruined my whole game haha but i fixed it before it was to late...

< Message edited by TeK -- 9/17/2007 6:25:39 AM >

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 36

Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:09:59 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/26/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Port Moresby , at 53,91

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 17

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk I x 23
Beaufighter VIC x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 6 destroyed, 2 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk I: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged
Beaufighter VIC: 1 destroyed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Rabaul at 61,88

Japanese Ships
DD Nokaze
DD Yunagi
DD Asanagi
DD Shiranuhi
DD Isokaze
DD Maikaze
DD Hayashio

Allied Ships
SS Sculpin, hits 3, on fire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Rabaul at 61,88

Japanese Ships
DD Shigure
DD Shiratsuyu
DD Kasumi

Allied Ships
SS Sculpin, hits 1, heavy damage

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 37

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:10:19 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

heh the way u play buddy i always think ur drunk anyway

LOL jk

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 38

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:47:40 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

heh the way u play buddy i always think ur drunk anyway

LOL jk

you mean doing something different and original each time unlike some people?

lol jk

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 39

Zeroes over PM again - 9/17/2007 8:48:00 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 40

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:48:17 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

dont worry, its all good, eventually youll just be easier and more predictable to me than the AI...haha jk

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 41

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:48:17 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeK

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

heh the way u play buddy i always think ur drunk anyway

LOL jk

you mean doing something different and original each time unlike some people?

lol jk

LOL

if it works!

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 42

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:48:47 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

it does...this is the only game where youve done decent against me

and weve only just started anyways....its barely played itself out yet

< Message edited by TeK -- 9/17/2007 8:50:58 AM >

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 43

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 8:55:58 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

lol ive done decent against u before

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 44

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 9:01:41 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

lol ive done decent against u before

haha when was that? when you sunk crappy shoho then i wasted you a week later near midway? or the time when i was bugged and my fighters set themselves to full escort at 20,000 feet?

oh congratulations on taking up my advice yet again and moving those subs away from rabaul

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 45

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 9:10:20 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

lol u got lucky at Midway

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 46

RE: Zeroes over PM - 9/17/2007 9:20:32 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeK

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

heh the way u play buddy i always think ur drunk anyway

LOL jk

you mean doing something different and original each time unlike some people?

lol jk

LOL

if it works!

thes the point of being original and trying something new!

you never know fully how itll work out....but just sitting there on a hex waiting the whole game is a different thing all together

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 47

Bombers over Rabaul - 9/17/2007 9:29:38 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/29/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 13

Allied aircraft
Hudson I x 13
B-17E Fortress x 29
B-24D Liberator x 64

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2-N Rufe: 2 destroyed, 5 damaged
L1N1 Thora: 3 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed
D3A Val: 6 destroyed
H6K2-L Mavis: 2 destroyed
H6K4 Mavis: 3 destroyed
E13A1 Jake: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Hudson I: 5 destroyed, 3 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 8 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
139 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 18
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 94

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
18 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
10 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
11 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 68,107

Japanese Ships
SS I-171

Allied Ships
DD Talbot
DD O'Brien
DD Russell
DD Hughes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 68,107

Japanese Ships
SS I-171, hits 12, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
DD McCall
DD Bagley
DD Blue
DD Ralph Talbot

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 48

Rabaul hit again - 9/17/2007 9:51:54 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/30/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 8
A6M3 Zero x 18

Allied aircraft
Hudson I x 6
Beaufighter VIC x 12
B-17E Fortress x 66
B-24D Liberator x 57

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2-N Rufe: 5 destroyed
A6M3 Zero: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
D3A Val: 3 destroyed
L2D2 Tabby: 5 destroyed
E13A1 Jake: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Hudson I: 2 destroyed
Beaufighter VIC: 3 destroyed, 1 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 2 destroyed, 21 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 2 destroyed, 8 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
210 casualties reported

Airbase hits 17
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 156

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
21 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
23 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
10 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
10 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 49

Rabaul hit again - 9/17/2007 12:02:54 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/31/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
Hudson I x 3
B-17E Fortress x 42
B-24D Liberator x 10

Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 1 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed
D3A Val: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
131 casualties reported

Airbase hits 8
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 44

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
11 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
5 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF, near Russell Islands at 66,96

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 10

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 5
F4F-4 Wildcat x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 6 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F4F-3 Wildcat: 3 damaged
F4F-4 Wildcat: 4 damaged

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 50

RE: Rabaul hit again - 9/17/2007 12:25:00 PM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

ive got a new plan, i was gonna take russell island just now but ive completely changed my plans and actually ive changed my entire doctrine and approach on the operation...

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 51

RE: Rabaul hit again - 9/17/2007 12:31:00 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

Russel is just an R&R area

nothin ta see there except sand and beach

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 52

Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/17/2007 12:56:54 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/01/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 67,104

Japanese Ships
SS I-174, hits 5

Allied Ships
DD McCall
DD Jarvis
DD Ralph Talbot
DD Blue
DD Bagley

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 67,104

Japanese Ships
SS I-174, hits 4, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
DD Talbot
DD O'Brien
DD Russell
DD Hughes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Allied aircraft
Hudson I x 6
B-17E Fortress x 60
B-24D Liberator x 37

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 2 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
AK Ryoka Maru, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Tama Maru #5, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nitiyo Maru, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
APD APD-39, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
AK Soyo Maru, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
AK Korei Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
APD APD-37, Bomb hits 7, on fire, heavy damage
APD APD-31, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
AS Jingei, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
AK Sanuki Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire
APD APD-46, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
AR Akashi, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
AV Kimikawa Maru, Bomb hits 8, on fire, heavy damage
APD APD-32, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Wales Maru, Bomb hits 1
AK Akashi Maru, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
APD APD-38, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
TK Hoyo Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire

Japanese ground losses:
163 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Port hits 17
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 5

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
5 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
16 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
5 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
13 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 65,92

Allied aircraft
TBF Avenger x 12
Beaufighter VIC x 11

Allied aircraft losses
TBF Avenger: 6 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Nagato, Bomb hits 1
BB Mutsu, Bomb hits 3
CA Chikuma, Bomb hits 2

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x TBF Avenger bombing at 10000 feet
2 x TBF Avenger bombing at 10000 feet
4 x TBF Avenger bombing at 10000 feet
4 x TBF Avenger bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 65,92

Allied aircraft
TBF Avenger x 4
Beaufighter VIC x 9

Allied aircraft losses
TBF Avenger: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Kinugasa

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x TBF Avenger bombing at 10000 feet

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 53

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/17/2007 1:17:43 PM

wild_Willie2

Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline

Stock games are boring, allied heavy's come in at 6000 feet and blast everything in their sight. IRL flak would have killed them comming in that low.....

NIK mod RULES!!!

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 54

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/17/2007 1:19:21 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

non sense!!!

get a hundred bombers dropping 10 or more bombs each and waddya get?

fireworks

_____________________________

(in reply to wild_Willie2)

Post #: 55

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/17/2007 1:21:52 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

especially on stationary targets!!

ya NOOB

_____________________________

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 56

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/17/2007 1:23:05 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Stock games are boring, allied heavy's come in at 6000 feet and blast everything in their sight. IRL flak would have killed them comming in that low.....

NIK mod RULES!!!

and Flak didnt get Doolittle and all his boys either!!!

or the B29s!

or all the thousands of bombers in Europe!!!

Flak is overrated!!!

long live the bomberzzz!!!!

_____________________________

(in reply to wild_Willie2)

Post #: 57

RE: Rabaul hit again - 9/19/2007 5:02:42 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

Russel is just an R&R area

nothin ta see there except sand and beach

yea but it can be a potential second airbase for you in the area, since we have the ac rule where you can only put so many ac on any airfield

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 58

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/19/2007 5:06:21 AM

TeK

Posts: 81
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marky

quote:

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Stock games are boring, allied heavy's come in at 6000 feet and blast everything in their sight. IRL flak would have killed them comming in that low.....

NIK mod RULES!!!

and Flak didnt get Doolittle and all his boys either!!!

or the B29s!

or all the thousands of bombers in Europe!!!

Flak is overrated!!!

long live the bomberzzz!!!!

flak was insufficient in all the raids you were refering to..."what about the b-29's?" give me a break lol...by that time japan's capacity for resisting the americans in the air was all but diminished...the only time the allies really flew that low was near the end of each conflict, because thats when they could get away with it, any time they flew that low in the early stages of the war they were slaughtered...and as for the doolittle raid...are you kidding again? would you have expected 16 medium bombers land based bombers to start bombing japan that early in the war?...and they got pretty lucky anyways, it was to much of a surprise to be threatened by flak, but they got lucky in getting away from japanese fighters, but again, surprise was on their side

if you were to pull off 6000 foot bombing like this in real life on a major base, yes your bombers would take much more slaughter than they have at that altitude, its not even argueable, lol you just know how unrealistic this all is but cant admit it...really, if you were to bomb rabaul in 1942, filling the sky that concentrated with huge lumbering bombers at 6000 feet and little or no escort, i guarantee you at least 50% of those bombers would be downed or have to turn back before they could even fully go through with the mission

i dont care, im having fun and still wanna play but im just saying...

< Message edited by TeK -- 9/19/2007 5:10:11 AM >

(in reply to marky)

Post #: 59

RE: Simpson Harbor hit HARD - 9/19/2007 5:34:02 AM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

lol

_____________________________

(in reply to TeK)

Post #: 60

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Carrier Battle! Unyo sunk!