cdbeck
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8/16/2005 From: Indiana Status: offline
|
I'm not sure this debate has any merit. Atrocities were done in all instances, as they were with Chinese immigrants who worked out west building railroads and mining gold. The Mormons were persecuted and driven to Utah (a pretty heinous act even if you do not agree with their religion, particularly in a country that prides its freedom of religion). Native Americans died in droves, partly due to their state of war with the US. Entire islands worth of indigenous peoples died in the Caribbean, to be replaced with African slaves. Rebelling black slaves in Haiti responded to their slavery with bloody massacres of Europeans. Africans helped enslave other Africans. Face it, history is bloody, messy, and full of human loss. The Irish had it bad, nearly 500K-1.5 million died in the potato famine, only to escape to the US and be forced into wage slavery, poverty, ghettos, and second class status (indentured servitude aside). Sure, more Africans died due to slavery, but the questions then become - how do you rank human suffering and is it useful to place one event against another and say "we had it worse?" Arguments like this are typically politically or nationalistically motivated, often with the ulterior motive of claiming some privilege, right, territory, or reparation. Suffice to say that many people of many ethnicities paid the price to make the United States what it is. Some willingly, some unwillingly, but all are to credit for America's greatness, just as all are to blame for its atrocities. SoM
< Message edited by Son_of_Montfort -- 1/16/2008 6:07:38 AM >
_____________________________
"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!" (Kill them all. God will know his own.) -- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade
|