Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: CleverDevils2 AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> After Action Reports >> RE: CleverDevils2 AAR Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 9:54:57 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Russia - having recently crowned a new tsar; enjoys the fruits of the
Sweden-for-Denmark deal his predecessor made with Britain...

How perfideous the Albion will be is yet to be determined...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 181
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:00:00 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Britain is meanwhile using his Swedish minions to attack French shipping and ports...





Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 182
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:10:46 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Britain is obvously waiting to try to attack defenseless French shipping...





Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 183
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:13:27 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Meanwhile; valient Frenchmen pledge to defend every inch of French soil (and water)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 184
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:17:30 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
France will garrison EVERY port or capitol to prevent any of the evil Brits from escaping
if they try to attack again.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 185
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:19:05 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Spain also appears to believe in a good defense






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 186
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 10:20:08 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Gibralter is also flying the wrong flag




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 187
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/25/2008 11:15:35 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline
Thanks for the update.

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 188
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/27/2008 3:44:04 AM   
Jimmer

 

Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
It is frequently incredible to see how biased some news sources can be.

Just consider the source, folks. Do you REALLY want your only source of information to be a "tin-plated over-bearing dictator with delusions of godhood"?

Back to tea and crumpets.

_____________________________

At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?

(in reply to anarchyintheuk)
Post #: 189
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 4/28/2008 11:33:57 PM   
AGT4533

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/24/2007
Status: offline
Austria shall not shirk from the responsibilities hoisted upon it by France's unjust declaration of war. The Empire has been preparing for this all last year by manipulating the economy to squeeze the maximum manpower and tax revenue out of the home provinces. Austria is fully mobilized to smartly counter any and all incurrsions.

Spain's DOW, while not completely unexpected, is perplexing. There is nothing that Spain can gain. I'll see to it, even if it is at the expense of French advancement. Austria ceded Papacy to Prussia during the Dec econ phase to keep it out of enemy hands, fully knowing that the requisiite PP loss would push me into Instability for the ensuing Diplo phase thereby causing my one conquered minor, in Italy no less, to go neutral so that it wouldn't be ripe for easy picking. Spain nor any other active ally of France shall not prosper from their aggression.

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 190
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/2/2008 6:20:57 PM   
Jimmer

 

Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
The French have been spreading their vile propoganda to many corners of the world. Rest assured that Great Britian shall assist you in your holy and righteous upholding of the traditions of Christian governorance (even if your nation does still show allegience to His Holiness in Rome).

By the way, I applaud the way you kept His Holiness' God-given territory out of the hands of the Corsican Usurper.

_____________________________

At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?

(in reply to AGT4533)
Post #: 191
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/4/2008 12:21:06 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Ok; here are the results of the first battles of the Austrian war :

Napoleon & 1 corp attack 1 Austrian corp in Linz.
Esc Assault vs (unsucessful) Withdraw
Result is 0 French losses; 1 Austrain I loss.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jimmer)
Post #: 192
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/4/2008 12:24:05 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
1 French corp (no leader) make successfull breakin in (Austrian controlled) Luxumbourg :
France loses 1 I; Luxembourg garrison breaks after losing 1 I :






1 French corp (no leader) makes unsucessful breakin attempt in Breisgau.


Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 193
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/11/2008 4:13:28 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
The French Army commanded personally by the Emperour Napoleon captures Vienna
4 French corp (65I, 20G, 12C) vs 1 Austrian corp (1M)
casulties 1 Austrian militia


Vienna city garrison surrenders after breach






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 194
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/11/2008 4:17:20 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
1 French corp makes successful breakin on (Austrain FS) Freiberg
Casulties 2 Freiberg I




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 195
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 2:32:36 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Austrian March 1806 turn:

Two Austrian corp from Mantua attack French controlled Lombardy corp + garrison in Milan and garrison in Turin:

Result :

MILAN:
MACK and I corp (13i,1c) ECHELON vs. Lombardy (4i) ESC CounterAttack.
Lombards eliminated second round; no Austrian casualites. Breach
attempts at Turin and Milan yielded SORTIE opportunities which the
defender declined to exercise.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 196
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 2:35:55 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Two French corp (no leader) attack 1 Austrian corp in Turin.
Chits were assault vs cordon.
Casulties : 6 Austrian I, 1 Austrian C; no French losses.
Austrian corp was eliminated.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 197
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 2:40:55 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Ok; ladies & gentlemen of the audience; we have the first "real" (exchange of battle-file files) battle to fight

Nappy was moving to attack Charles when the Austrian Insurrection corp appeared.

We are currently in the process of resolving this & I will post results when they are complete




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 198
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 7:55:42 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Ok; the battle in leopoldstadt is resolved:

1st round was 4 French corp (65I, 20G, 12C) commanded by Nappy vs
2 Austrian Insurrection corp (30I 6C) no commander




Result from round 1 - no casulties on either side; 0.2 Austrian mrl.

Note - there was an ... interresting... effect on the loss screen - the program
was appearently offering me (France) the choice of Artillery (non in THIS battle)
or SHIPS (in a land combat)

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by gwheelock -- 5/18/2008 7:57:51 PM >

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 199
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 8:00:11 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
In round 2; Charles reinforces in with 8 more Austrian corp.

Losses were 13 French I; 10 Austrian M :






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 200
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 8:09:56 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
In round 3; both sides commit guard (France loses 1 G due to commit).
Austria breaks

(Tutorial Note: You should always check the tables that you are on. This combat
was Echelon vs Cordon. This would normally be 4-1 vs 4-3. Because it was
a cross-river attack this becomes 3-1 vs 4-3. Because the area is "Forrest"
both sides are reduced 1 casulty table to 2-1 vs 3-3. French guard can commit
for +2 Morale tables bringing it to a 2-3 vs 3-3. Due to Nappy's +1; the lowest
roll is a 2. The mrls for a 2 on the 2-3 table is 0.8 which is greater than the
morale remaining to the Austrian forces at the end of round 2 [0.73] & thus
GUARENTEEING an Austrian break.)

Casulties 12 French I; 7 Austrian I, 1 Austrian C
Because of the high French mrls (>4) & 3 rounds of combat there is no persuit.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 201
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 9:16:08 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Ok; at the end of the March 1806 turn; the PS standings are :






Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 202
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/18/2008 9:17:02 PM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
And the VP standings are :





Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 203
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 1:25:48 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Ok; here are the results for France's April 1806 turn :

Davout & 4 French corp attack Mack & 1 Austrian corp in Milan/Lombardy.

Chits were Esc. Assault vs CounterAttack.
Casulties were 2 French M vs 13 Austrian I, 1 Austrian C.
Austria was eliminated & Mack was captured.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 204
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 1:34:41 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
Napoleon & 5 French corp attacked Salzberg; breakin was successful & 1 Austrian M surrendered.

Massena, 1 French corp & the Holland corp attacked Bagration & 2 Russian corp in
Hamberg.

Chits were Probe vs Esc. CounterAttack.
Casulties were 5 Holland I vs 8 Russian I, 1 Russian M.
(City breakin was also succussful; casulties were 2 more Holland I vs 7 Russian M)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 205
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 1:38:34 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
As part of the 1st battle of Hamberg; 1 brave Saxon I attacked Kutuzov & 2 Russian corp
in Keil to prevent him from reinforcing into the battle in Hamberg

Chits were Esc Assault vs Esc CounterAttack.
casulties were 1 Saxon I - no Russian losses were ever possible...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 206
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 1:47:55 AM   
gwheelock

 

Posts: 563
Joined: 12/27/2007
From: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Status: offline
On the Russian land turn there was a 2nd battle of Hamberg.
Kutuzov, Bagration & 4 Russian corp (which should have 33I 2M since they
were the 4 corp that were shown in the previous 2 combats) vs Massena,
1 French corp and 1 Holland corp (20 French I, 2 French C, 2 Holland I, 2 Holland C)

Chits were ??? vs a SUCCESSFULE Withdrawl (attacker chit was either
Assault or Esc Assault because withdrawl was on the "normal" roll not with
a +1 or an automatic)

no combat details to report

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 207
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 8:13:24 AM   
Jimmer

 

Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
In the interests of allowing more than one viewpoint to be presented, His Majesty King James III has graciously allowed the early dissemination of military action about to occur. If you will look at the enclosed map, you will see that a significant portion of His Majesty's Royal Navy is poised to unload large quantities of the best fighting men in the world right into the lap of the Usurper's territory. In an incidental note, it is clear that any of France's three remaining heavy Fleets could be put at risk.

The PM believes nothing can be done to prevent this action, and so also extends his benificence to allowing onlookers some thoughts on the upcoming struggle(s):

First, it is obvious that there are three primary targets available to the British regulars: Brest, La Rochelle, and the prize, Lorient. Brest and La Rochelle each contain a single heavy fleet containing 6 ships, and Lorient contains the last heavy fleet, including 15 ships of the line. La Rochelle also contains the French Transport Fleet with all 20 of her merchant ships. Despite their poorly-trained crews and misguided loyalties, these are obviously excellent practice ranges for the British Army.

But, there are a series of questions arising out of this. The PM was overheard musing about these possibilities with Lord Nelson prior to battle. Both now agree that discusion cannot compromise the integrity of the war effort, so these issues are posed here, mainly as food-for-thought.

First, take note that the cowardly Frenchies have retreated inland. This is, presumably, so that they can strike back in May at whatever positions the British army decides to attempt taking in April. Clearly, the French have the ability to strike at any or all of the ports (the three corps between Lorient and Orleans were each in the three respective ports before they turned tail and ran away). With Davout and Massena both busy in their unjust war against the peaceful Austrians, along with the Usurper himself, this leaves their best available leader as Soult. Soult is a seasoned commander, but, of course, no match for the Duke of Wellington!

There are really three options available to the British right now:

1) Attack all three ports with enough force to guarantee a victory in the siege combat, should they successfully breach the walls. Since all three ports have only a single factor guarding them, this would seem to be a very tasty possibility indeed. Two of the cities have fletches, and so present a 50/50 chance of breaking in to them (due to the lack of troop strength). The third (Lorient) has no fortifications to speak of, and thus offers a 2/3 chance of breaking in.

2) Attack the two northern cities. The intention here would be to either win and spank the French back to their vineyards, or, on the extremely unlikely chance they lose, they would retreat along the coast, towards Lille and eventually go back to London via the Channel.

3) Attack one city in force. The intent here would be twofold: Preserve the army to fight yet again on French soil, and leave two naval targets that essentially force France to continue committing corps and troops far away from the other enemies of the Usurper's regime. The PM is actively considering this possibility, as the British army was left to languish under the previous government, and is not considered an army that can continue fighting against the hordes of French rabble Bonaparte is certain to send against them. So, even landing them was an all-volunteer mission, holding out no hope of ever returning home. But, these heroic soldiers are all willing to pay whatever price must be paid in order to end the tyrannical reign in Paris.

You, like the PM, may now muse over these thoughts. Actual battle results should become available within a few days.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?

(in reply to gwheelock)
Post #: 208
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/30/2008 8:38:08 AM   
Jimmer

 

Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
It is not known what came over the commander of His Majesty's troop transport fleet. She loaded up her troops as commanded, but then mysteriously seems to have forgotten to set sail. The admiral in charge has been summoned to London, and the matter WILL be thoroughly investigated.

It is not know which corps she picked up. However, it IS known that there were six corps present in Portsmouth prior to movement. Additionally, it is known that the III, V, and Swedish (on loan from the King of Sweden, and is training under Lord Nelson's personal tutelage) heavy fleets DID set sail. Their strengths at the beginning of April were known to be 20h, 9h, 10h, respectively. It is also known that a small, swift fleet of four frigates also set sail, and even this fleet was carrying a corp.

Finally, it is known that one of the corps present in Portsmouth at the beginning of April was the Swedish I corps showing their loyalty to their good friends in London. It is NOT known, however, what the strength of this unit was. However, just a few weeks back, it released 4000 men into the garrison of Portsmouth. It can be speculated that the corps itself would not have wanted to weaken itself, and is therefore full (or, possibly missing its vaunted cavalry battalions). It IS known, however, that the Swedish I corps set sail with the III British heavy fleet, which contained 20 ships of the line. Furthermore, another British corps joined their Swedish colleagues on that fleet.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?

(in reply to Jimmer)
Post #: 209
RE: CleverDevils2 AAR - 5/31/2008 10:29:40 PM   
Jimmer

 

Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
Well, I finished off land. I also finished off all of the French heavy fleets.
 
I wasn’t going to do it this way. I had decided on putting my whole force into one place, and fight on French soil for a few turns. However, do you recall when I did my naval move that I complained that the game had left my transport fleet in Portsmouth?
 
Well, it just so happens Wellington was with that corps. So, I didn’t have an army; I had a collection of individual corps. I figured, why bother piling them up without a leader? So, I spread them out (to all three ports).
 
They all made their break-in rolls.
 
For reference, Brest has two corps with 9 and 1 factors in them. La Rochelle has one corps with 10 factors. And, Lorient has a Swedish corps (full) and a British corps (6 factors). No casualties occurred in the British forces. Three French infantry (I think they were infantry – I didn’t really check that) were killed, one in each port.
 
So, the mighty British army is reduced to three piles of factors (more or less), while the not-so-mighty French navy has been reduced to firewood for the aforementioned factors. :)

_____________________________

At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?

(in reply to Jimmer)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> After Action Reports >> RE: CleverDevils2 AAR Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.406