HMSWarspite
Posts: 1401
Joined: 4/13/2002 From: Bristol, UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins The game does not focus on modeling the _system_ of each different nation, so much as modeling the differences in issues, constituent groups, economy, taxes, debt, etc. that make each nation a different challenge. It's not so much a game of elections, but a game of managing a country and staying in power by making more people happy than unhappy. With that said, there are differences. For instance, when playing the UK you'll have the House of Commons and may face dilemmas related to support for the Monarchy, immigration, religious extremists, etc. It's not generic, but this is not focused on each system of government as its prime focus. I do hope it isn't a stereotyped nationalities thing: the monarchy is not a mainstream political issue in UK and hasn't really been for years (if ever). Religion is not a factor in UK at all - to a degree that I think a lot of Americans would struggle to believe (noting that I differentiate 'religion' from the cultural/political and historically derived issues surrounding conflict between the west and the middle east). The make up of the House of Lords now is a different issue... Also I think a failure to differentiate between a Presidential republic and a parliamentary constitutional monarchy would be a killer for me. The leader (prime minister) of UK does not have to worry about personal election (he obviously has to get elected to the House of Commons but that is a sure thing given his/her party will make sure they have a safe seat), and can never have the Commons against him after an election (well maybe in theory but never in practice). This gives a very different feel to elections in UK to US I believe. The personal popularity of the PM (leader of the party) can be a very poor predictor of electoral success - look at Churchill in 1945. In effect the only way we can send a message to an unpopular PM away from a general election is in local elections which have no effect on national government and hence would be irrelevant in a game such as this. On the other hand, managing the party for a PM can be at least as important as keeping the people happy - look at Thatcher: lost control of the party (and the support of the electorate) so the party dumped her and Major survived another 6 years (including an election). Issues Britain should cover are (in no order) immigration (I'll give you that one!), Europe, the conflict(s) in the east, US relationship (to an extent as a flip side to Europe, but also asymmetric extradition issues and so on)), environment, security vs personal freedom, etc as well as all the usual economic things. Not trying to start a political flame war here, just advise what would maybe make me interested in the game...
_____________________________
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
|