RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/3/2008 11:19:18 PM

Tankerace

Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline

Sorry, didn't see the thread move up. I have replied by email to all those who were accepted, as well as to all those who weren't. If you didn't get an email from me, it probably means I never got an email from you.

However, if you wish send me an email. If we have testers drop out over the coming months I will contact those that weren't accepted and that I have emails from privately to see if they would like to join the team.

_____________________________

Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.

(in reply to E)

Post #: 31

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/4/2008 2:24:54 AM

Grotius

Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline

One more thought about Carrier Force and WITP: I agree that if all of WITP used the CF routines, the game would be unplayable. But do the CF folks think it could be implemented only for carrier actions in WITP? Maybe just for CV vs CV actions? After all, carrier battles hardly happen every day in WITP.

Or is not possible to confine the CF system to just one setting?

(in reply to Tankerace)

Post #: 32

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/4/2008 3:17:01 PM

Ursa MAior

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline

Dang here at the fringe of civilization we have some terrible net providers cuz I have failed to recieve your answer too even though I got the note that my msg has been delivered to the address. Backwater places s#ck.

_____________________________

Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Grotius)

Post #: 33

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/4/2008 4:44:29 PM

Akos Gergely

Posts: 733
Joined: 4/8/2004
From: Hungary, Bp.
Status: offline

Same here....

_____________________________

My blog: https://warshipprojects.com/

(in reply to Ursa MAior)

Post #: 34

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/6/2008 10:08:57 AM

Tankerace

Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline

Really? Send me another message then. I will save the addresses and keep them in the file. That is odd, every message says it was replied to and saved, and I didn't delete any of the tester emails.

_____________________________

(in reply to Akos Gergely)

Post #: 35

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/6/2008 10:12:01 AM

Tankerace

Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

One more thought about Carrier Force and WITP: I agree that if all of WITP used the CF routines, the game would be unplayable. But do the CF folks think it could be implemented only for carrier actions in WITP? Maybe just for CV vs CV actions? After all, carrier battles hardly happen every day in WITP.

Or is not possible to confine the CF system to just one setting?

Actually it wouldn't be because the CF system allows for intimate control of LBA, CVs, and even regular shipborne scouting. And that doesn't even factor in naval combat improvements.

I will say such a project would be conterproductive, if we retrofitted that to WitP or WitP:AE then why would most of the customer market want to buy CF? But that's just my IMO. Before I worry about another project I want CF out the door. Then I'll go beg for another job from Joel. Have to keep making games to pay for grad school. And/or women. Both are expensive and teach you a lesson.

_____________________________

(in reply to Grotius)

Post #: 36

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/6/2008 4:18:50 PM

Akos Gergely

Posts: 733
Joined: 4/8/2004
From: Hungary, Bp.
Status: offline

E-mail sent just a second ago, please confirm :).

Cheers

_____________________________

My blog: https://warshipprojects.com/

(in reply to Tankerace)

Post #: 37

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/6/2008 4:57:30 PM

Ursa MAior

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline

Mail also sent. Pls check your spam filter cuz even though my mail provider is the hungarian company of the big german T-kom group I have had problems with it from time to time.

THX

_____________________________

Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Akos Gergely)

Post #: 38

RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers - 2/6/2008 10:44:22 PM

TSCofield

Posts: 223
Joined: 5/12/2001
From: Ft. Lewis Washington
Status: offline

Got the message that he has enough testers.

Oh well.

_____________________________

Thomas S. Cofield
Feature Editor, SimHQ.com
t.co0field@comcast.net (stopped the SimHq mail since I get nothing but spam)

(in reply to Ursa MAior)

Post #: 39

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Second call for Carrier Force beta testers

Page: << < prev 1 [2]