Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 3:31:40 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IRONCROM

 Tom is working on a another version of "Age Of Napoleon" that will probable not be out for another week.

Star Drek is still going through testing. Going off of some of the comments on the forum I'm guessing bulldog may make some changes before there through.
Which leaves the "War for Eldorado"
I'll contact the designer and see if he is interested in doing some play testing with me. Is anyone interested in joining a game?(Bulldog, Rick)




Sure I can join in a game of El Dorado.

Rick

(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 31
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 4:49:01 AM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		 The designer has agreed to play test with us.

I just played out about 5 turns against AI and I don't think were going to find any problems with this one. There are no special graphics or action cards. (none of the usual bug causes)



(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 32
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 10:49:08 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline
After exchanging emails with TWebber, I put the zip for WaW_v32 together. One of you might want to double check to make sure I didn't make a mistake.

After that I'm fine with approving WaWv32. I've put it in the "waiting for approval" pool at the community site.

Rick

(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 33
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 1:00:39 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		I'm happy to approve it, Fogg has also posted to say it downloaded fine.

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 34
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 7:42:56 PM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline 		Vic,

I was going throught the sandbox list on the community site and realize that they're all marked as approved - YES.

I suspect that was done when you re-organized and I just hadn't noticed. Should we change that - actually the way you have it set up now, I'm not sure that column is even needed.

If you want I can go in and change entries to NO for the Sandbox.

Rick

< Message edited by Rick -- 3/21/2008 9:56:40 PM >

(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 35
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 7:45:03 PM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline 		Bulldog,

Go ahead and approve it then. IRONCROM was satisfied with it earlier.

Rick



(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 36
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 8:00:09 PM   
alaric318

 

Posts: 366
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline 		thanks for all the support on the scenarios in the sandbox, thanks for the time on it, thanks Vic for a clean and clear game system/engine and thanks Tom Weber for all, "worth-playing" scenarios that have make available,

best regards,

Murat30.

_____________________________

There is no plan of battle that survives the contact with the enemy.

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 37
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/21/2008 10:04:18 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		Okay, WAW v32 approved. My first approval .

(in reply to alaric318)
Post #: 38
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/24/2008 4:38:40 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline

Murat30,

I've just about got this taken care of. Got rid of the crash to desktop, but need to fix up the event card and the event. I'll have the event card add swedish navy to stockholm.

I'll also flag scenario as human only. And I'll edit the narrative to remove warning about the peace option.

I'll let you know before I upload the revised one. And I'll upload it to the sandbox for folks to test.

Rick

(in reply to alaric318)
Post #: 39
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/24/2008 2:16:27 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		Delyn needs some help with his Lords of the Realm scenario. I will check it out. Bulldog

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 40
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/25/2008 12:06:00 AM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		 Hi Guys.

I'm totally satisfied with Knight's scenario. They don't get more stable than that.

My vote is to approve...

Rick if your good with the scenario we don't need to continue. I know you got a lot of things going on.
I'm just playing for fun now.... Come to think of it I'm always just playing for fun.

How about you Bull? Have you had a chance to look at it yet?

_____________________________


(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 41
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/25/2008 1:17:48 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline

I agree I think it looks solid. Approve whenever youre confortable. I'm fine to continue the game unless you would rather not.

I'm hoping to finish up Murat30's Diplomacy Napolean sometime today. I'd like you guys to to take a look after I finish. (I'll change version number in sandbox). I'll let you know when I upload it.

Rick

(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 42
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/25/2008 7:17:51 AM   
alaric318

 

Posts: 366
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rick



Murat30,

I've just about got this taken care of. Got rid of the crash to desktop, but need to fix up the event card and the event. I'll have the event card add swedish navy to stockholm.

I'll also flag scenario as human only. And I'll edit the narrative to remove warning about the peace option.

I'll let you know before I upload the revised one. And I'll upload it to the sandbox for folks to test.

Rick



thanks for all support on the scenario, is for me a privilege to have people as you on board, think that can speak about all people around, hope that people like the scenario and play it and enjoy, last days i do not have get much time "free" and have been consuming time on other things, anyway i do not success or achieve to fix the error by myself, thanks both for update the info on the scenario and for fix it,

with best regards,

murat30.


_____________________________

There is no plan of battle that survives the contact with the enemy.

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 43
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/25/2008 4:35:46 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		The War for Eldorado by Iron Knight is a nicely balanced scenario and one which I may like to spend more time on in the future.

I have no objections to you approving as per your comments above.

Thanks.

Bulldog

(in reply to alaric318)
Post #: 44
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/27/2008 7:53:35 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline 		I've just uploaded the final version of the Salerno VI Corp (v12)to the Waiting for Approval Area on the community site. Made very minor changes, added and truck to American Divisional Artillery and made a few addtional notes in the briefing.

Bulldog and Ironcrom, I'll let you two check this one out and approve if you don't mind.

Rick


< Message edited by Rick -- 3/27/2008 7:56:17 AM >

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 45
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/27/2008 6:41:50 PM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		No problem Rick. I have been anxiously awaiting your new version.

_____________________________


(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 46
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/28/2008 4:11:34 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		I will check this out tonight...

(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 47
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/28/2008 10:37:17 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		I have been playing the Salerno scenario till I won as Germany against AI+1. I like the way the map has the valleys surrounded by hills to create the only corridors that the allies can come down. An unusual but effective thing I noticed was having lots of small German units. Usually I have units of around 40 rifles and accompanying support units but the small units usually of only 15 rifles and support was nice and it allowed a lot of flexibility in deploying the troops to stop the americans spreading out from the beach. Nice events to reinforce HQ and bring in more units. I did not notice any bugs in the game which went smoothly till the end. If I did have to gripe about something it was that it was a bit short, but perhaps the battle was short (don't know much about that particular battle), also the engineers numbered only 10 per unit and the turns were not long enough to get them to reach 150 points to build a fortification so I am not sure of their usefulness? I have no objections to approving this scenario, its a nice little game if you are short on time, quite enjoyed it.   

< Message edited by BULLDOGINTHEUK -- 3/28/2008 10:44:12 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 48
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/28/2008 10:43:13 PM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BULLDOGINTHEUK

I have been playing the Salerno scenario till I won as Germany against AI+1. I like the way the map has the valleys surrounded by hills to create the only corridors that the allies can come down. An unusual but effective thing I noticed was having lots of small German units. Usually I have units of around 40 rifles and accompanying support units but the small units usually of only 15 rifles and support was nice and it allowed a lot of flexibility in deploying the troops to stop the americans spreading out from the beach. Nice events to reinforce HQ and bring in more units. I did not notice any bugs in the game which went smoothly till the end. If I did have one thing to gripe about was that it was a bit short, but perhaps the battle was short (don't know much about that particular battle).  I have no objections to approving this scenario, its a nice little game if you are short on time.   



Bulldog, thanks for comments. And yes, the actual battle was short. In fact I might have tacked on a couple of extra days in my "interpretation" just to lengthen it out. I was actually looking to build a short quick battle that could be used to lure in some folks who wanted more "historical" scenarios. (And I was also learning the editor - so it worked for me)

Thnks,
Rick

(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 49
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/29/2008 7:22:53 AM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		 Alright, I had a chance to check out Salerno again and as before it looks good to go.

My vote is for approval.

P.S. thanx for adding the extra trucks to the latter round allied artillery Rick.

_____________________________


(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 50
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/29/2008 8:03:52 AM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		@Bulldog

How's your star drek testing going?

I haven't really given it a good look yet. I was waiting to give you some time in case you need to make some changes first.

_____________________________


(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 51
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/29/2008 12:56:46 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		I am going to put the Trek Mod in Sandbox for now as we have a problem with Womulan PP an supply on turn 1. It is not a game killer but needs fixing.

(in reply to IRONCROM)
Post #: 52
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 3/29/2008 6:15:02 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		Vic helped me with the problem I was having with the Trek Mod (as usual it was a simple error) and I have now posted version 1.3 on the AT community site.  It is ready for your critical eyes now for approval if you all feel its okay. Let me know.  Thanks

_____________________________


(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 53
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/1/2008 4:06:54 AM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline 		Bulldog,

I'll check this out later tonight.

Rick

(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 54
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/1/2008 10:36:56 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		Make sure you download the new 1.4 version as otherwise the research will not work. Thanks.

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 55
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/2/2008 3:59:33 PM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline 		Guys,

Can I suggest that you request/require people to put the version number of their mod in the filename AND in the scenario briefing. Makes it easier for all to know which version is being played.

My $0.02

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 56
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/2/2008 7:50:09 PM   
rickier65

 

Posts: 14231
Joined: 4/20/2000
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Barthheart

Guys,

Can I suggest that you request/require people to put the version number of their mod in the filename AND in the scenario briefing. Makes it easier for all to know which version is being played.

My $0.02


Thats a excellent idea!

Rick

(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 57
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/2/2008 10:02:59 PM   
BULLDOGINTHEUK


Posts: 505
Joined: 10/12/2007
From: Cardiff, UK
Status: offline 		Alreadt tried this. I tried calling the filename StarDrek1.20 etc but it would not upload for some strange reason. Could be the full stop? or perhaps it only accepts words, not numbers?

(in reply to rickier65)
Post #: 58
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/2/2008 10:04:35 PM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline 		It's the full stop. Use underscore ie StarDrek_v1_2.pt2 or whole numbers only ie StarDrek_v12.pt2.

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to BULLDOGINTHEUK)
Post #: 59
RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 - 4/2/2008 11:46:23 PM   
IRONCROM


Posts: 679
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline 		Learn something new everyday.

_____________________________


(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.984