Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Allied DC

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Allied DC Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Allied DC - 2/12/2008 11:36:35 AM   
Ursa MAior

 

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline
I remember in one of my first really detailed book of US CVs (Squadron/Signal US aircraft carriers in acion Part I), there was something like a page devoted to the loss of Lady Lex. Basically she (and Wasp) have sunk the same way as many japanese carriers did. Hit by submarine torps while refueling craft. The book cited a DC specialist who advised the filling of the refueling pipes with CO2 while under attack. It was stated there too that the adoptation of this method took some time use (even if it was used at Midway on the Yorktown). Other methods (like training the whole crew in DC) were also used only from summer of 42 extensively.

This or that way allied DC started to be superior due to the evaluation of the early war accidents (something the IJN was never really capable of).

Based on the above (not 100% researched) opinion my question would be whether a different allied DC superirity would be included.

1. like Zero bonus getting better with time to a maximum (current level) at say 01/06/1942
2. affecting all allied (french, aussie, british, dutch, US merchant) ships

THX in advance.

Edited for spelling

< Message edited by Ursa MAior -- 2/12/2008 11:38:13 AM >


_____________________________


Art by the amazing Dixie
Post #: 1
RE: Allied DC - 2/12/2008 12:13:00 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline
This was a national and service difference--a willingness to look at the evidence and act on it. Sometimes, it didn't happen--e.g. American torpedoes--for a while or at all. In the IJN, DC was a low-status speciality, and so wasn't emphasised in training/exercises. The same thing still happens.

Treat it as a crew characteristic influenced (strongly) by leadership and culture.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Ursa MAior)
Post #: 2
RE: Allied DC - 2/12/2008 2:08:46 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline
Another good question is about engineering of the ships. As allied ship construction got better did the durability of those ships also increase? And if so, could that have had a direct effect on the effectiveness of US DC?

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 3
RE: Allied DC - 2/12/2008 2:54:11 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shark7

Another good question is about engineering of the ships. As allied ship construction got better did the durability of those ships also increase? And if so, could that have had a direct effect on the effectiveness of US DC?


It actually got worse in the RN. I'm not sure how many of the lessons learnt got back to the American naval shipyards in time for 1945. American DC was effective because commanders took it seriously. It was not as important to IJN commanders--a defensive rather than offensive concern.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Shark7)
Post #: 4
RE: Allied DC - 2/12/2008 8:44:49 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
Some US Navy Damage reports: they give an example of the US Navy mindset concerning the importance of damage control.
http://www.dcfp.navy.mil/cgi-bin/WarSummary.cgi

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 5
RE: Allied DC - 2/12/2008 9:53:33 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termite2

Some US Navy Damage reports: they give an example of the US Navy mindset concerning the importance of damage control.
http://www.dcfp.navy.mil/cgi-bin/WarSummary.cgi


Declassified in 1994? By that time, how long had the Soviet Union had copies? I seem to recall we had copies of the Soviet copies... 8)

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 6
RE: Allied DC - 2/17/2008 8:33:07 PM   
Ursa MAior

 

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline
I found it. Ronald H Spector: At war, at sea.

In 1942 there was only 9 DC schools running which was supported by another 12 in 1943. Acording to Spector allied DC got in highest speed in 1944 bringing examples of kamis hitting DDs which survives against serious dmg.


_____________________________


Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Allied DC Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.750