Herode_2
Posts: 188
Joined: 10/30/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bismarck If you buy DB:BiI, you'll have an excellent game of the Italian campaign but that's all. No, that's not all. A lot of great scenarios have been designed for BiI : Russian campaigns, Pacific War, France campaigns and so on. BiI is really a nice game. I own both and after my opinion, the initial question is aporetic. The point is : do you want a grognard game (rigid and static set of rules, historicity not questionnable) ? BiI is for you. Do you want something more flexible ? AT is THE FLEXIBLE-UNIVERSAL GAME and displays an awesome quality for something so flexible. Really. As scenarios designers become more and more trained and acurate, we also have more and more historical scenarios which are not as historical as BiI's ones, nor any HPS Panzer Campaign's scenarios, of course, but which are very close in terms of credibility, flavour and gaming-depth. I like historicity but I do not define myself as a grognard. Were I to take my turn on the Desert Island, AT would me my choice without any question : more flavours, more things to do, more sizeable, more choices, and... more games : AT is really a X games for one (X >>>> 1 ) as optional rules and settings really bring new points of views on the theater of war : the North Africa scenario is not the same game than Tweber's Great War, nor is the WaW one. A random game and Russia 41 are two different experiences. And so on. My opinion is : no wargame player can avoid playing AT. That's all.
< Message edited by Herode2 -- 2/18/2008 11:04:29 PM >
|